Case law

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Dussinger

9 N.J. Misc. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1931

Seaside Home v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 110 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1922

The assessment was canceled by the Cape May county board of taxation. On appeal to the state board of taxes and assessment, the order of the county board, in canceling the assessment, was reversed. … The case is clearly distinguished from the cases of the Borough of Longport v. Bamberger, 91 N. J. L. 330, and Institute of Holy Angels v. Borough of Fort Lee, 80 Id. 545.

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board

165 N.J. 523 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 6, 2000

Borough of Princeton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

333 N.J. Super. 310 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 2000

Ironbound Comm. *324 v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 230 N.J.Super. 133 , 553 A.2d 30 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 117 N.J. 64 , 563 A.2d 828 (1989). A similar analysis should apply here. … Ibid; Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island Heights, 138 N.J. 307, 313 , 650 A.2d 748 (1994); Fereday & Meyer Co. v. Board of Public Works, 27 N.J. 218 , 142 A.2d 99 (1958).

Reppucci v. Board Chosen Freeholders, Hudson Co.

130 N.J.L. 22 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1943

The answer, in the negative, is to be found in a decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in the recent case of Kobylarz v. Mercer, 130 N. J.

Pennyton Homes, Inc. v. Planning Board of Stanhope

41 N.J. 578 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1964

This land subdivision approval case involves a question not specifically passed upon in Levin v. Township of Livingston, 35 N. J. 500 (1961), and Hilton Acres v. Klein, 35 N. … A. 40:55-1.18: “The governing body or the planning board, as the case may be, may tentatively approve a plat showing new streets or roads or the resubdivision of land along a mapped street.

Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Twp.

120 N.J.L. 463 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1938

Mitchell, v. Tolan, 33 N. J. L. 195; Jersey City v. Erwin, 59 Id. 282; reversed, sub nom. Erwin v. Jersey City, 60 Id. 141; Oliver v. Jersey City, 63 Id. 634; Lang v. Bayonne, 74 Id. 455; Harrison v. … Atlantic City v. Abbott, 73 N. J. L. 281; Wogish v. Board of Health of Moonachie, 114 Id. 261. See, also, 15 A. L. R. 301. The writ is accordingly dismissed, with costs.

Township of Bridgewater v. Local Government Board

137 N.J.L. 416 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 19, 1948

Justice Perskie speaking for the Supreme Court in Crisci v. Board of Commissioners of Raritan, 119 N. J. L. 103; 194 Atl. Rep. 445 . … Hermann v. Guttenberg, 63 N. J. L. 616; 44 Atl. Rep. 758 (Court of Errors and Appeals); Bellis v. Fleming ton, 69 N. J. L. 349, 352; 55 Atl. Rep. 300 (Court of Errors and Appeals), Peck v. New Barbadoes, 12 N. J. Mis.

Penna. R.R. v. Board Public Utility Commrs.

116 N.J.L. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936

Rivkin v. Dover Township Rent Leveling Board

277 N.J. Super. 559 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1994

Plaintiffs contended, and the trial court agreed, that Baltarzuk’s performance as a Board member deprived them of procedural due process. See Marshall v. … In Daniels v.

179 Duncan Avenue Corp. v. Board of Adjustment

122 N.J.L. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 29, 1939

Subsequently, upon the protests of neighboring business people, a hearing was had *293 before the Board of Adjustment, as a result of which the board voided the permit issued to the prosecutor. … This legal principle is supported by a line of cases of which Gabrielson v. Glen Ridge, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 142, is typical. See, also, State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389; Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 Id. 183.

Holscher v. Board of Commissioners of Camden

7 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 1950

The only distinction between the facts of this case and those in our decision in the case of Ostroff et al. v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Camden, 7 N. J. … Our decision in Ostroff et al. v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Camden is controlling here. The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed, with costs.

Wyndham Construction Co. v. Board of Adjustment

1 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1949

An appeal to the Board of Adjustment was denied. Plaintiff first attacks the ordinance as prohibiting it from making lawful use of its property. … Next it is said that the Board of Adjustment had no jurisdiction to deny a variance. This argument is wholly without merit as a reading of R.S. 40:55-39 clearly indicates.

Clayton v. Freehold Township Board of Education

67 N.J. 72 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 1975

Macaluso v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

6 N.J. Misc. 739 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1928

After consideration of the facts in this case as presented by the petition, and the argument of counsel, we cannot say that the action of the board of public utility commissioners was either unreasonable or an abuse of power

Johnson v. Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

8 N.J. Misc. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 13, 1930

L. 1927, was revoked by the respondent board after a complaint and hearing.

State v. Board of Health & Vital Statistics

85 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 26, 1913

The argument is that as the act of 1887 is a general law, providing not only for a state board of health and bureau of vital statistics, but a local board in each of the municipalities of the state, and conferring upon such … boards created by the later enactment.

General Omnibus Co. v. Board of Commissioners

97 N.J.L. 332 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 9, 1922

Butt Realty Co. v. Board of Adjustment

134 N.J.L. 619 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 1946

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Maza

4 N.J. Misc. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

v. … This is controlled by State Board v. Buettel, 3 N. J. Adv. R. 1860.