Opinion

Penna. R.R. v. Board Public Utility Commrs.

  • 116 N.J.L. 415
  • 184 A. 841
  • 1936 N.J. LEXIS 280
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
May 14, 1936
Status
Published
On the bench
PER CURIAM.
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 50.1%

The opinion

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None. *Page 416

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.