Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

7.19s

  • Restaurant Corporation of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    801 F.2d 1390 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1986

    The Board must carry its “affirmative burden,” Midwest Stock Exchange v. … See, e.g., Midwest Regional Joint Board v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    364 A.2d 610 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1976

    Ibid.; Cassidy v. Baltimore County Board of Appeals, 218 Md. 418 , 146 A.2d 896 ; 2 Merrill, Notice, 384, 444. [Emphasis in original.] II. We turn now to a consideration of B.Z. A. … The Maryland Court of Appeals in Sullivan v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Foster v. United States

    615 A.2d 213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1992

    But see Rose v. … Co. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • International Union of Electrical v. National Labor Relations Board

    352 F.2d 361 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1965

    But the Board has now rejected that rule, and, we think, it was within its statutory' authority in so doing. See Bernel Foam Products Co., 146 N.L.R.B. No. 161 (1964); National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Co., 344 U.S. 344, 349 , 73 S.Ct. 287 , 97 L.Ed. 377 (1953); Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. U.S. Parole Commission

    236 F. Supp. 3d 168 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2017

    Brown v. United States Parole Comm’n, 190 F.Supp.3d 186, 189 (D.D.C. 2016) (citing D.C. Code § 24-131(a), (c)); see also Frcmklin v. District of Columbia, 163 F.3d 625, 632 (D.C. … Brown, 190 F.Supp.3d at 190 (quoting Collins v. Youngblooa’, 497 U.S. 37, 43 (1990)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • North Lincoln Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    727 A.2d 872 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1999

    The mere existence of evidence to the contrary, even if substantial, “does not allow this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board.” Spevak v. … While the Board must give great weight to the concerns raised by the Association, “it is *878 not obliged to follow [the Association’s] recommendations or adopt its views.” 5 Upper Georgia Ave. Planning Comm. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trans-Pacific Freight Conference Of Japan v. Federal Maritime Board

    302 F.2d 875 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1962

    In fact, the Board on several occasions expressly disclaimed such authority. See Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 81 F.Supp. 544, 547 (S.D.N.Y.1948), appeal dismissed sub nom. A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. … See, e.g., Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, 367 U.S. 316, 322 , 81 S.Ct. 1611 , 6 L.Ed.2d 869 (1961); United States v. Seatrain Lines, 329 U.S. 424 , 67 S.Ct. 435 , 91 L.Ed. 396 (1947); Alaska Airlines v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Local Union No. 47 v. National Labor Relations Board

    927 F.2d 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1991

    See UMW, Dist. 31 v. NLRB, 879 F.2d 939, 944 (D.C.Cir.1989); IBEW, Local U66 v. NLRB, 795 F.2d 150 , 155 (D.C.Cir.1986). … NLRB v. United Techs. Corp., 884 F.2d 1569 , 1575 (2d Cir.1989); see Local 1395, IBEW v. NLRB, 797 F.2d 1027 , 1029 (D.C.Cir.1986).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Woodley Park Community Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    490 A.2d 628 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1985

    Goto v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, 423 A.2d at 923 ; see also State ex rel. Housing Authority v. Wind, 337 S.W.2d 554, 558 (Mo.App.1960); Cave v. … E.g., Arkae Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 312 N.W.2d 574, 577 (Iowa 1981); State ex rel. Green’s Bottom Sportsmen, Inc. v. St.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • International Brotherhood Of Boilermakers v. National Labor Relations Board

    316 F.2d 373 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1963

    See National Labor Relations Board v. Coca-Cola Bot. Co., 350 U.S. 264 , 76 S.Ct. 383 , 100 L.Ed. 285 (1956); National Labor Relations Board v. … Goodman Manufacturing Co., 352 U.S. 872 , 77 S.Ct. 94 , 1 L.Ed.2d 77 (1956); National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jarvis v. Parker

    13 F. Supp. 3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 2014

    See also Spears v. … See Brown Opp’n at 3-4.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • National Capital Girl Scout Council v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    231 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 1964

    District of Columbia v. Friendship House Ass’n, Inc., 91 U.S.App.D.C. 137 , 198 F.2d 530 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Towles v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    578 A.2d 1128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1990

    Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 293 A.2d 470, 473 (D.C.1972). … Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 407 A.2d 1091, 1101 (D.C.1980) (citing Stewart v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center v. National Labor Relations Board

    81 F.3d 209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 19, 1996

    See NLRB v. … .); NLRB v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Kansas Refined Helium Co., Intervenor

    547 F.2d 598 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1977

    Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board, 313 U.S. 177, 200 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1941). … App.D.C. 355, 365 F.2d 888, 891 (1966); NLRB v. Brown and Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 452 (8th Cir. 1963). 6 .

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Bragg v. Army Board for Correction of Military Records

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2020

    Case No. 1:19-cv-02286 (TNM) ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS, et al., Defendants. … (quoting Morris v. Sullivan, 897 F.2d 553, 558 (D.C. Cir. 1990)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baylor University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

    662 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 20, 1981

    NLRB v. Baylor University *58 Medical Center, 439 U.S. 9, 10 , 99 S.Ct. 299 , 58 L.Ed.2d 202 (1978) (per curiam). In 1979 the Court had another opportunity to consider the Board’s application of its presumption. NLRB v. … Beth Israel Hospital v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bramley v. Hampton

    403 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 17, 1975

    See Brown v. General Services Administration, 507 F.2d 1300, 1306-07 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. granted, 421 U.S. 987 , 95 S.Ct. 1989 , 44 L.Ed.2d 476 (1975). See also Hackley v. … See, e.g., Clark v. Goode, supra, at 133-34; Kurylas v. Department of Agriculture, supra, aff’d, 514 F.2d 894 (D.C.Cir.1975) ; Roney v. Saxbe, 380 F.Supp. 1191 (D.D.C. 1974). . Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Humbles v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

    484 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1984

    Sisto v. CAB, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 31, 35 , 179 F.2d 47, 51 (1949) (footnote omitted). … This court’s review is “upon the exclusive record for decision” before the Board. D.C. Code § 1-1510 (a) (1981); see Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 320 A.2d 282, 287 (D.C.1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    389 F.2d 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1967

    Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. [National] Labor [Relations] Board, 319 U.S. 533, 540 , [ 63 S.Ct. 1214 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 ].” Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R. … See, e.g., N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.