Case law

State v. Jacobson

348 Mo. 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1941

In Bean v. State (Okla. Crim.), 208 Pac. 834 , Foster v. State (Okla. Crim.), 252 Pac. 450 , Stout v. State (Okla. Crim.), *261 258 Pac. 1054 , and Nicholson v. State (Okla. … Brown, and that he lived on the “Gray” farm near that place, and needed a small sum of money for funeral expenses for his son who had died suddenly. Hpon being identified as “W. E.

Rousey v. Wood

47 Mo. App. 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1892

Robinson v. James, 71 Mo. 582 ; State v. Hays, 78 Mo. 600 ; City of Hopkins v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 100 ; Spurlock v. Dougherty, 81 Mo. 171 . … Walker v. Likens, 24 Mo. 298 ; Wyatt v. Thomas, 29 Mo. 23 ; Howard v. Clark, 43 Mo. 348 ; Dunbar v. Wightman, 51 Mo. 432; Brown v. Harris, 52 Mo. 306; Melcher v. Scruggs, 72 Mo. 406 .

Bailey v. Trustees of Mineral School District

14 Mo. 498 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1851

Afterwards, about the 29th of March, 1840, one Brown, who was largely indebted to the school fund, handed over to one or both of these trustees (which, it does not appear) the sum of two hundred dollars, which, as appears … Both parties, however, admitted in their subsequent oral *500 statements to the treasurer of the board, when called upon concerning it, that they were jointly liable for the money.

Hill v. Montgomery

352 Mo. 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1943

So, if Brown said to Raab "Go on," Raab truthfully did not have any talk with Brown. The rule relied on by appellants was stated in Adelsberger v. … Kleinschmidt v. Globe-Democrat Pub. Co., 350 Mo. 250 , 165 S.W.2d 620 ; Aulgur v. Strodtman, 329 Mo. 738 , 46 S.W.2d 172 , l.c. 173 [3]; Pfotenhauer v.

Thompson v. Southwest School District

483 F. Supp. 1170 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 18, 1980

In Drake v. Covington Board of Education, 371 F.Supp. 974 (M.D.Ala.1974), plaintiff was terminated by a school board for “immorality”. … Further, the school board president indicated that plaintiff’s teaching ability had never been an issue and was not disputed. The factual situation here differs from the circumstances of Brown v.

Mary Beth Fryman v. The Board of Regents of Southeast Missouri State University

Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2024

In support, the Board relies on Dale By and Through Dale v. Edmonds, 819 S.W.2d 388 (Mo. App. 1991) and Patterson v. Meramec Valley R-III School District, 864 S.W.2d 14 (Mo. App. 1993). … Hensley v. Jackson Cnty., 227 S.W.3d 491, 496 (Mo. banc 2007) (quoting Oldaker v. Peters, 869 S.W.2d 94, 100 (Mo. App. 1993)).

Glasgow School District No. 60, Howard County v. Marshall

333 S.W.2d 547 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1960

R-3 v. … Browning v. Juden, Mo.App., 264 S.W. 101 , 102-103.

Anslinger v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

54 S.W.3d 703 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2001

David Anslinger, M.D., (hereinafter, “Doctor”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the discipline imposed by the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (hereinafter, “the Board”) after the … We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find there was substantial and competent evidence in the record to support the Board’s decision. Larocca v.

Suarez v. Thompson

283 S.W.2d 584 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1955

Wilbur Johnson Brown testified in behalf of plaintiff. He is a telephone clerk in the employ of defendant, tie boarded train No. 7 at Tower Grove Station in St. Louis *586 en route to Texarkana on the night Mrs. … The law is clear that any such presumption disappeared from the case when Williams and Brown testified to the contrary. 31 C.J.S., Evidence, § 124, p. 738; Michler v.

Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Missouri Real Estate Commission

712 S.W.2d 666 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1986

In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), the Supreme Court of the United States outlawed racial segregation in the public schools of the states. In Cooper v. … The statute in question was substantially the same as the statute held unconstitutional in Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

Wolven v. Springfield Traction Co.

143 Mo. App. 643 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1910

[State v. Norman and David, 159 Mo. 531 , 60 S. W. 1036 ; State v. Scott, 214 Mo. 257 , 113 S. W. 1069 ; State v. Brown, 168 Mo. l. c. 474, 68 S. … The Supreme Court in State v. Wilson or Collier v. Coal Co., do not refer to State v. Brown or State v.

Shelton v. Annuity Board of the Southern Baptist Convention

915 F. Supp. 124 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 20, 1996

Co. v. Null, 554 F.2d 896, 901 (8th Cir.1977). … Most of materials related to the Plan were forwarded from defendant Annuity Board in Texas to the plaintiff. It is not clear, but it appears that premiums were paid to defendant Annuity Board (in Texas).

Roth v. Tiedeman

53 Mo. 489 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1873

Tiedeman and the Board of Education of the City of Capé Girardeau, to enforce a mechanic’s lien against certain property in that city. … Brown, 11 Mo., 139 , as showing that the same words, when-used by the statute defining the jurisdiction of the St. Louis Court of Common Pleas, have received a widely different construction by this court.

United States v. Sedovic

500 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 6, 1980

United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 364, 373 (8th Cir. 1976). 7. Such fraud is actionable where there is, as in this case, a loss to the citizens of the state or municipality. E. g., United States v. … United States v. Brown, supra at 376. 11.

Jones v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

115 Mo. App. 232 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1905

[Sloan & Co. v. Railroad, 58 Mo. 220 ; Potts v. Railway, 17 Mo. App. 394 ; Brown v. Railway, 18 Mo. App. 568 ; Popham v. Barnard, 77 Mo. App. 626 .] A case squarely in point is Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Ry. … Co. v.

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TIMOTHY GREEN, JR.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2024

State v. Clay, 533 S.W.3d 710, 714 (Mo. banc 2017) (quoting State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 284 (Mo. banc 1995), and Rule 30.20). . . . … The State argues that the evidence adduced at trial supported a reasonable inference that Defendant struck Victim with the board or, at a minimum, acted in concert with others who struck Victim with the board.

Billy J. Reynolds and Jody Miller v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

468 S.W.3d 413 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2015

See State v. … In Rentschler v.

State Ex Rel. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Elliott

387 S.W.2d 489 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1965

The facts appearing in the pleadings; exhibits, and stipulation are as follows: On December 26, 1963, the Relator Board *490 initiatéd proceeding's against Virgil A. Bit-tiker, D. O. … State Tax Commission v. Walsh, Mo.Sup., 315 S.W.2d 830 , State ex rel. Toberman v. Cook, 365 Mo. 274 , 281 S.W.2d 777 , and State ex rel. Dalton v. Oldham, Mo.Sup., 336 S.W.2d 519 .

Charlesworth v. Jacob

224 Mo. App. 1014 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1930

Charlesworth, plaintiff, v. Blanch E. Jacob and F. E. Jacob, defendants, Hattie Morris Brown, interpleader. … [See Kortjohn v. Seimers, 29 Mo. App. 271, 276 ; Browning v. Hilig, 69 Mo. App. 594, 596 ; Addison v. Dent Co. Savs. Bank, 205 Mo. App. 622 ; State ex rel. v. Ry. Co., 193 S. W. 932 ; Skinner v. Slater, 159 Mo.

Gossin v. Huskey

348 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 31, 1972

Board of Education of Chidester School District No. 59, Chidester, Ark., 8 Cir., 448 F.2d 709 and Sparks v. … Griffin, 5 Cir., 460 F.2d 433 . 2 There is not a scintilla of credible evidence that the Special School District has racially discriminatory hiring practices. 3 At all times, at least since Brown I, (Brown v.