Case law

Davis v. Board of Medical Examiners

497 F. Supp. 525 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 23, 1980

State Board of Optometrists, 5 N.J. 412 , 75 A.2d 867 (1950); Head v. New Mexico Board, 374 U.S. 424 , 83 S.Ct. 1759 , 10 L.Ed.2d 983 (1963). Rather, the issues are much narrower. … These are Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

Leang v. Jersey City Board of Education

196 N.J. 85 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 2008

951 A.2d 1040 (2008) 196 N.J. 85 LEANG v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION. NO. C-1104 September Term 2007, 62,622 Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 26, 2008. Petition for certification. Granted.

Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Newark

121 N.J.L. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1938

SAUNDERS v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 16, 2023

Pa. 2013) (noting that although this standard typically applies to municipal entities, it “applies with equal force to supervisory liability claims premised on a ‘policy, practice, or custom’ theory” (citing Brown v. … Hoag v. Brown, 935 A.2d 1218, 1230 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007). Consequently, Count II is dismissed as to the NJDOC.

Nusser v. Board of Adjustment of Newark

134 N.J.L. 174 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 22, 1946

This writ of certiorari brings up for review the action of the Board of Adjustment of Yewark in denying to prosecutor a permit for the alteration of a store property located at 587 Springfield Avenue, in that city. … Considering all the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the action of the zoning board was unreasonable and should be set aside.

Lourdes Medical Center v. Board of Review

394 N.J. Super. 446 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 2007

Admin, v. … Dep’t of Employment & Training, 147 Vt. 525 , 520 A.2d 602, 604 (1986); Browning-Ferris, Inc., supra, 438 A.2d at 1364-65 ; Hertz Corp. v.

Fay v. BELMAR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

957 N.J. 461 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 5, 2008

957 A.2d 1170 (2008) 957 N.J. 461 FAY v. BELMAR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. C-12 September Term 2008 62,760 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 5, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

Hammond v. Board of Aldermen of Paterson

123 N.J.L. 553 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1940

State v. Kievman, 116 Conn. 458 ; 165 Atl. Rep. 601 ; 88 A. L. R. 962. Such was the purpose of the present ordinance. … On May 2d, 1938, when his first application for a junk yard license was considered by the board, the application was denied after full hearing.

Lettieri v. State Board of Medical Examiners

24 N.J. 199 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1957

Pellet v. Board of Com’rs of Mayor and Council of City of Hoboken, 4 N. J. Super 259 (App. Div. 1949), certification denied 3 N. J. 368 (1949). … Fischer v. Township of Bedminster, 11 N. J. 194 (1952); Roberts Electric, Inc., v. Foundations & Excavations, Inc., 5 N. J. 426 (1950); State ex rel. Wm. Eckelmann, Inc., v. Jones, 4 N. J. 374 (1950).

Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARK

9 N.J. 405 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 5, 1952

Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. J. 200 (1949); Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton, 133 N. J. L. 230 (Sup. Ct. 1945). … Vide Brandon v. Montclair, cited supra; Lynch v. Borough of Hillsdale, cited supra; Verniero v. Board of Commissioners of City of Passaic, 134 N. J. L. 71 (Sup. Ct. 1946).

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Livesey

6 N.J. Misc. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 8, 1928

The state board sued out this writ to review that judgment. *178 At the trial it appeared that the defendant was a licensed chiropractor; that his place of business was in Arlington; that he had a reception room, a treating … See State Board of Medical Examiners v. Lezenby, 1 N. J. Mis.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Baudendistel

6 N.J. Misc. 249 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1928

to him to practice chiropractics, by the state board of chiropractor examiners, on November 22d, 1920. … See State v. Herring, 70 N. J. L. 34. Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Board Education of Lawnside v. Haddon Farms

128 N.J.L. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 23, 1942

The case falls clearly within the rule of Smith v. Applegate, 23 N. J. L. 352. … See Kean v. Elizabeth, 35 N. J. L. 351; Montclair Military Academy v. North Jersey Street Railway Co., 70 Id. 229; Arotzky v. Kropnitzky, 98 Id. 344; Polkowitz v. Ewing, 115 Id. 93.

BROWN v. MCDONOUGH

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 29, 2025

Brown Kevin J. Maggio, Esq. … Department of Veterans Affairs, No. 1:21-cv-02732-KMW-AMD (D.N.J.). 2 See Brown v. Department of Veterans Affairs, No. 2:22-cv-00007-AB (E.D. Pa.). A.

Board of Education v. Richmond Construction Co.

92 N.J.L. 496 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1918

With this, apparently, the learned trial judge agreed, hut he was, we think, misled by what was said by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in American Bonding Co. v. Gibson, 145 Fed. … The language of this clause V of the uniform building contract is peculiar.

Board of Commissioners v. Civil Service Commission

137 N.J.L. 728 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 3, 1948

Burlington v. Dennison, 42 N. J. L. 165; Levy v. North Bergen Township, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 850; 161 Atl. Rep. 45 . On May 21st, 1935, following a municipal election, the Board by resolution appointed Otmar J. … On December 31st, 1946, the Board of Commissioners passed a general salary ordinance.

Board of Education v. Bloomfield Education Ass'n

126 N.J. 300 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 8, 1991

La Fronz v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION

164 N.J. Super. 5 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1978

Super. 5 (1978) 395 A.2d 538 THOMAS LA FRONZ AND WEEHAWKEN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WEEHAWKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Crifasi v. Oakland Governing Body, 156 N.J. Super. 182 (App. Div. 1978).

State Board of Medical Examiners v. DeBaun

7 N.J. Misc. 1040 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1929

State Board v. Lezenby, 1 N. J. Mis. R. 20; State Board v. Livesey, 6 Id. 177; State Board v. Baudendistel, Ibid. 14; State Board v. Blechschmidt, Ibid. 682.

Suruda v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION

167 N.J. Super. 331 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 1979

Super. 331 (1979) 400 A.2d 860 WILLIAM SURUDA, BEATRICE BAILEY AND DOMINICK PUGLIESE, PLAINTIFFS, v. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided March 9, 1979. *332 Mr. … It is established that legal fees in connection with the defense of a challenge to board membership are within the *334 ambit of N.J.S.A. 18A:12-20. Jones v. Kolbeck, 119 N.J. Super. 299 (App.