Case law

McKinley v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

849 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2012

Brown v. DOJ, 742 F. Supp. 2d 126, 129 (D.D.C. 2010), quoting SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. SEC, 926 F.2d 1197, 1200 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). … However, it is McKinley’s and not the Board’s burden to establish that predecisional records have been adopted as policy. See, e.g., Mayer, Brown, Rowe and Maw, LLP v. IRS, 537 F.

Allen v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

560 A.2d 492 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1989

See Wells v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighter’s Retirement & Relief Board, 459 A.2d 136, 138-39 (D.C.1983) (en banc); Price v. … See Seabolt v.

Audrea Jones v. District of Columbia Armory Board

438 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1970

In Adderley v. … Women Strike for Peace v. Hickel, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 29 , 420 F.2d 597, 603 (1970).

James L. Cherry and Mildred F. Cherry v. Brown-Frazier-Whitney, Partnership

548 F.2d 965 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 11, 1976

Murrah v. Fire Ins. Exchange, 480 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1973) (15 months); Salmon v. City of Stuart, 194 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1952) (15 months); United States v. … Bush v. United States Postal Serv., 496 F.2d 42, 44-45 (4th Cir. 1974); Stanley v. Alcock, 310 F.2d 17, 20 (5th Cir. 1962). 42 . Peterson v. Moore, 267 F.2d 496 , (3d Cir. 1959); Council of Federated Orgs. v.

Lay v. United States

831 A.2d 1015 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2003

Murray v. … Finally, the record contains sufficient independent evidence of Brown’s guilt. See Sams v.

North Carolina State Board of Elections v. United States

208 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2002

Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 559 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969). As this Court explained in Beer v. … They rely in particular on Busbee v.

International Transportation Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

449 F.3d 160 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 2006

ITS pressed the Board to abandon Vila-Barr in light of a Seventh Circuit case that questioned its correctness, see Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. … Cleveland Constr., Inc. v. NLRB, 44 F.3d 1010, 1014 (D.C.Cir.1995). The Board must provide “a reasoned explanation” for its decisions. Petroleum Comm. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 1164 , 1172 (D.C.Cir.1994).

Inland Empire District Council v. National Labor Relations Board

62 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1943

This cause came on for hearing on the complaint seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, and the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order to restrain a proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter … The court being of the opinion that administrative remedies have not been exhausted and that it does not have jurisdiction, under the allegations of the complaint, to enjoin the Board or the members of the Board from conducting

Willamette Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

253 F.3d 720 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2001

Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 367 (1998). … Ctr. v. NLRB, 871 F.2d 137, 146-47 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

855 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 2017

Wayneview Care Ctr. v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Pirlott v. NLRB, 522 F.3d 423, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2008). … Edison Co. of N.Y. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 217 (1938); see also Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951).

Charles Nasem v. Honorable Harold Brown, Secretary of the Department of Defense

595 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 10, 1979

This time the Army appointed a Board of Inquiry (Board) to investigate the reprisal charge. … The Board re-examined the allegations of reprisal reviewed in the April 10, 1975 OFEEO decision, as well as additional allegations made in the two May letters. The Board found that there had been no reprisal.

E.N. Bisso & Son, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

84 F.3d 1443 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1996

.”); Boire v. … Clothing Workers of America v.

Rail-Term Corp. v. Surface Transportation Board

654 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2015

Petitioner has not shown that the Surface Transportation Board reopened proceedings and issued a new and final order. See Am. Ass’n of Paging Carriers v. FCC, 442 F.3d 751, 756 (D.C. … See ICC v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270, 278 , 107 S.Ct. 2360 , 96 L.Ed.2d 222 (1987).

Can-Am Plumbing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.3d 145 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 2003

Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 244 (1959). In such instances, ‘‘due regard for the federal enactment requires that state jurisdiction must yield.’’ Id.; see also Brown v. Hotel & Rest. … NLRB v.

New England Air Express, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

194 F.2d 894 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1952

The Board allowed petitioner to file affidavits, documentary evidence, and written argument, and also to “present orally its reasons why its registration should not be suspended * * *." Standard Airlines, Inc., v. … Moreover petitioner’s objection to the Board’s hearing was not presented to the *895 Board and therefore comes*too late. Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 78 , 183 F.2d 975 .

National Labor Relations Board v. Sagamore Shirt Company

401 F.2d 925 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968

Wkrs., etc. v. N.L.R.B. … Such activities furnished a permissible basis for a Board inference adverse to the Company's good faith in refusing to recognize the Union. Joy Silk Mills v.

Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

996 F.2d 1271 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1993

United States v. Nunzio

430 A.2d 1372 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1981

We long have adhered to that view. 4 Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 411 A.2d 631, 633 (1980); McDaniels v. United States, D.C.App., 385 A.2d 180, 182 (1978); see Franklin v. … United States v. Addonizio, supra, 442 U.S. at 188-89 , 99 S.Ct. at 2242 ; Brown v. United States, supra, 411 A.2d at 632 ; Walden v. United States, D.C.App., 366 A.2d 1075, 1077 (1976); Burrell v.

Cook Cleland Catalina Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

195 F.2d 206 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1952

In Eastern Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board 5 we discussed the applicability of the hearing provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. 5. … Compare Standard Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1949, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 29 , 177 F.2d 18 .

Waterbury Hotel Management, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

314 F.3d 645 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 2003

Labor Relations Board Scott V. … See Saks & Co. v.