Opinion

Inland Empire District Council v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 62 F. Supp. 207
  • 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1650
Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Dec 21, 1943
Status
Published
Author
Donoghue
On the bench
Donoghue
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

O’DONOGHUE, Judge.

This cause came on for hearing on the complaint seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, and the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order to restrain a proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called the Board), pursuant to Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 159 , hereinafter called the Act, for the investigation and certification of representatives, and on a motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint on the grounds, inter alia, that this Court was without jurisdiction of the subject matter of the complaint and that plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. The Court has read and considered the papers and pleadings filed in this case, and has heard oral argument of counsel.

The court being of the opinion that administrative remedies have not been exhausted and that it does not have jurisdiction, under the allegations of the complaint, to enjoin the Board or the members of the Board from conducting the proceedings before it, it is hereby;

Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion for temporary restraining order be, and the same is hereby, denied, and it is further;

Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the complaint be, and the same is hereby, dismissed without costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.