Case law

Jones

District Court, E.D. Michigan · Dec 29, 2025

Qualified Immunity Defendants also assert that the claims against Sheriff King must be dismissed under qualified immunity. … Nor is Sheriff King entitled to qualified immunity under the Elrod/Branti defense.

Moody v. Ungerer

18 Brief Times Rptr. 1019 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Jun 13, 1994

In evaluating a police officer’s claim of qualified immunity, a reviewing court must determine whether the right allegedly violated was “clearly established,” i.e., whether the contours of the right were sufficiently clear … Accordingly, we hold that Trooper Moody is entitled to qualified immunity.

Bordelon v. Franklin Township, Unpublished Decision (12-13-2001)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 2001

of clearly established law and the information that he possessed. … defendant's conduct did indeed violate clearly established rights).

Bishop v. Szuba

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jul 12, 2018

Clearly Established Law An official is entitled to qualified immunity so long as his or her actions don’t “violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known … (holding that defendant was entitled to qualified immunity because plaintiff “failed to satisfy her burden on the clearly-established-law prong of the qualified-immunity standard”).

JACOBS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 4, 2019

Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 (2009) (“The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … Insomuch as the CO Defendants would like to invoke the doctrine of qualified immunity because their purported after-the-fact conspiratorial actions did not violate a then-clearly established constitutional right, that attempt

Keil v. TRIVELINE

720 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 24, 2010

However, subsequent United States Supreme Court cases reveal that limited discovery on the qualified immunity issue is allowed, so long as the plaintiffs allegations state a violation of clearly established law. … In Mitchell, the Court opined, Unless the plaintiffs allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery

Smith v. BRT

363 Ark. 126 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 2005

Under that analysis, a motion for summary judgment based upon qualified immunity is precluded only when the plaintiff has asserted a constitutional violation, demonstrated the constitutional right is clearly established, … qualified immunity under Ark.

Emmanuel Mervilus v. Union County

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 13, 2023

Kaminskas Does Not Have Qualified Immunity. After holding Mervilus’s claim against Kaminskas failed, the District Court did not address qualified immunity. … Whetzel, 256 F.3d 120, 126 n.1 (3d Cir. 2001) (reaching qualified immunity on appeal from a decision that did not reach the issue); Est. of Smith v.

Pueblo of Pojoaque v. New Mexico

214 F. Supp. 3d 1028 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Sep 30, 2016

Qualified Immunity Motion Reply at 9. With respect to the clearly established prong, the Individual Defendants argue that the Plaintiffs still fail to establish a violation of a clearly established right. … Clearly Established Rights in the Qualified Immunity Analysis.

Lucero v. Mathews

901 P.2d 1115 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1995

Clearly Established Law Qualified immunity generally shields government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when their conduct “ ‘does not violate clearly established statutory or … “In order to find qualified immunity, the objective legal reasonableness of a government official’s conduct is assessed in the light of the clearly established statutory or constitutional rights at the time of the action.

In Re Iacono

120 B.R. 691 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Nov 2, 1990

IRAs were originally established to ease the tax burden of employees that were not covered by a qualified pension plan as well as to encourage savings for retirement. … 10), retirement or other plan established by a corporation, which is qualified under section 401 of the U.S.

City of Hialeah v. Fernandez

661 So. 2d 335 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 27, 1995

[FN3] Once the qualified immunity defense is raised, plaintiffs bear the burden of showing that the federal "rights" allegedly violated were "clearly established." … [The officer] is entitled to qualified immunity because it was not clearly established that the amount of force used outside the restaurant was unlawful. Post, 7 F.3d at 1559-60 (citations omitted).

Petsche v. Hruby

District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 26, 2025

The Individual Defendants assert qualified immunity on the § 1983 claims and statutory immunity under Chapter 2744 on the state law claim. … was clearly established at the time of the defendant’s alleged misconduct.”).

Jared Armstrong v. Gerard Asselin

734 F.3d 984 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 1, 2013

Defendants moved for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. … as a whole,” was obscene, and therefore the officers were not entitled to qualified immunity.

Amore v. Novarro

624 F.3d 522 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 12, 2010

(3) was clearly 8 established at the time that he was arrested." … Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192, 207-08 (1973) that petitioners are entitled to qualified immunity on the ground that it was not clearly established at the time of the search that their conduct was unconstitutional

McKie v. Van Buren, County of

District Court, W.D. Michigan · Sep 27, 2019

Plaintiff argues that the Magistrate Judge properly held that the individual Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity where any reasonable officer in the same position would have taken reasonable measures for … Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19(1982) (“If the law was clearly established, the immunity defense ordinarily should fail, since a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.”).

Vickey Horton Tapley v. Darrell Collins

211 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 5, 2000

Under this common-law defense, public officials sued in their individual capacities are entitled to qualified immunity when their actions do not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.” … established and deny them qualified immunity when they violate statutory rights that similarly are not clearly established.”

Rzeszewski

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2026

Garcia, and because no clearly established rights are at issue, Officer Rzeszewski is entitled to qualified immunity. Doc. 26 at 21—28. In opposition, Dr. … Garcia had a clearly established right to be free from arrest and prosecution absent probable cause, qualified immunity does not protect Officer Rzeszewski. Doc. 33 at 16-17.

Ballard v. Cope

District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Feb 1, 2023

Qualified Immunity and Qualified Official Immunity Defendants also argue that Cope is protected from Ballard’s federal claims by qualified immunity and from Ballard’s state law claims by … Kentucky’s qualified official immunity doctrine.

KARA B. v. Dane County

205 Wis. 2d 140 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1996

Qualified immunity does not protect public officials who have allegedly violated someone's clearly established constitutional right. Anderson v. … established law' in the qualified immunity determination.