Case law

State v. Brown

51 Kan. App. 2d 876 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Sep 4, 2015

See United States v. Segal, 549 F.2d 1293, 1298-1300 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 431 U.S. 919 (1977); United States v. Williams, 321 Fed. Appx. 486, 489-90 (6th Cir. 2009); Finney v. … See State v. Billings, 30 Kan.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Brown v. Brown

254 Pa. Super. 410 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1978

Halderman v. Halderman, 230 Pa.Super. 125 , 326 A.2d 908 (1974); Shuster v. Shuster, 226 Pa.Super. 542 , 323 A.2d 760 (1974); Commonwealth v. Testa, 226 Pa.Super. 585 , 323 A.2d 199 (1974).” Commonwealth ex rel. Hall v. … See Jack v. Jack, 253 Pa.Super. 538 , 385 A.2d 469 (1978); Wiegand v. Wiegand, 242 Pa.Super. 170 , 363 A.2d 1215 (1976); Kayaian v. Kayaian, 223 Pa.Super. 103 , 297 A.2d 136 (1972).

State v. Brown

236 N.J. 497 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 2019

The panel, citing Giglio v. … State v. Hegel , 113 N.J. Super. 193 , 202, 273 A.2d 383 (App. Div. 1971) (quoting State v.

Levesque v. Hudson

106 N.H. 470 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Oct 29, 1965

Bouley v. Nashua, 106 N. H. 79; Fortuna v. Zoning Board of Manchester, 95 N. H. 211. … Bouley v. Nashua, supra. See Suprenant v. Nashua, 101 N. H. 43.

Ames 2304, LLC v. City of Ames, Zoning Board of Adjustment

924 N.W.2d 863 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 8, 2019

See State v. … See Brakke v. Iowa Dep’t of Nat.

Brown v. Brown

704 S.W.2d 524 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 1986

Appellant Dawn Marie Richards Brown appeals from a judgment granting appellee Horace Brown a divorce, on grounds of cruelty, and voiding two post-marital agreements. … Gentry v. Gentry, supra; McDonald v. McDonald, 316 S.W.2d 780 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1958, no writ); Daughtry v. Daughtry, 312 S.W.2d 957 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1958, no writ).

Katherine Richards Brewer, derivatively on behalf of Regions Financial Corporation and Regions Bank v. Josh M. Turner, Jr.

Court of Chancery of Delaware · Sep 29, 2025

The Senators’ Letters In April 2020, Regions received letters from Senators Cory Booker and Sherrod Brown encouraging Regions to stop charging overdraft fees during the COVID-19 pandemic. … BioScrip, Inc. v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown

217 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1970

Brown, appellant, filed a petition for support in Cumberland County, the county of her residence, in accordance with the Civil Procedural Support Act, Act of July 13, 1953, P. L. 431, 62 P.S. §2043.31 et seq. … Brown, to pay $20 per week for the support of their son Edward, and denying support for her. Appellant appeals from that part of the order of August 16, 1969, which denied support for her.

Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. Francois

832 F. Supp. 2d 1364 · District Court, N.D. Florida · May 27, 2011

A physician who violates the Florida referral statute is subject to disciplinary action by the medical board. § 456.053(5)(f), Fla. Stat. … Browning, 522 F.3d 1153, 1167 (11th Cir.2008). *1367 Sometimes, a federal law contains an express statement that it is displacing state law, making the federal law the sole governing standard. Id.

Brown v. Brown

74 Va. Cir. 260 · Chesapeake County Circuit Court · Oct 11, 2007

Butler v. Butler, 221 Va. 1035, 1037-38 , 277 S.E.2d 180, 181-82 (1981); see Diaz v. Diaz, 568 F.2d 1061, 1063 (4th Cir. 1977). This exception to sovereign immunity is implemented in the Commonwealth by Va. … Jur. 2d, Divorce and Separation, § 869 (1998); see, e.g., Joe v. Joe, 891 So. 2d 879 (Ala. Civ.

People v. Brown

243 N.E.3d 249 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 27, 2023

People v. Taylor, 2023 IL 128316, ¶ 45; People v. Vingara, 2023 IL App (5th) 230698, ¶ 14; People v. Rios, 2023 IL App (5th) 230724, ¶ 8. … Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners, 2012 IL 111928, ¶ 48. The best indication of the legislature’s intent is the plain language of the statute. Id. We must evaluate the statute as a whole.

Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellan

521 F.2d 1024 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1975

Tenney v. … Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). . Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 308 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). . McSurely v.

Brown v. Brown

800 S.W.2d 801 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1990

Brown, appellant, filed his pro se brief with this court. … Roden v. Tofle, 779 S.W.2d 290 (Mo.App.1989), In Re marriage of Sowers, 733 S.W.2d 19 (Mo.App.1987). Mr. Brown’s brief fails to comply with the requirements *802 of Rule 84.04 Missouri Supreme Court Rule.

Martin v. Brown

123 N.E.3d 712 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2019

Polaris Sales, Inc. v. HERITAGE IMPORTS

879 So. 2d 1129 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 3, 2003

Cherry, Bekaert Holland v. Brown , 582 So.2d 502 , 506 (Ala. 1991). … SEE, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

In Re the Personal Restraint of Myers

105 Wash. 2d 257 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1986

Accordingly, we hold that Parole Board Rule 2.081 is invalid. See RCW 9.95.150; Baker v. Morris, supra. … V Because the Board has paroled Myers, a remand to the Board to recompute his sentence would serve no purpose.

People v. Brown

122 A.D.3d 133 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 10, 2014

People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d at 265-266 ; People v Salgado, 111 AD3d 859 [2013]; People v Crawford, 110 AD3d 916 [2013]; People v Nugent, 109 AD3d at 625-626 ; People v Bouton, 107 AD3d 1035 [2013]; People v Oquendo, 105 AD3d … at 448 ; People v Vasquez, 101 AD3d at 1054; People v Nicholson, 101 AD3d at 905; People v Keiser, 100 AD3d at 928; People v Grant, 83 AD3d at 863 ; People v Gheradi, 68 AD3d at 893 ; People v Boustani, 300 AD2d at 314 )

State v. Brown

170 Idaho 439 · Idaho Supreme Court · Jan 6, 2022

State v. McIntosh, 160 Idaho 1, 6, 368 P.3d 621, 626 (2016). Generally, once a defendant is placed into actual physical custody of the Board of Corrections, the district court’s jurisdiction is extinguished. State v. … Next, if the district court orders a rider under section 19-2601(4), the district court retains jurisdiction of the defendant, which in essence means it shares “concurrent” jurisdiction with the Board. State v.

In re D.S.

364 N.C. 184 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2010

Shelton v. Morehead Mem’l Hosp., 318 N.C. 76, 81-82 , 347 S.E.2d 824, 828 (1986) (citations omitted). Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law and are reviewed de novo. E.g., Brown v.

V. . Brown

2 N.C. 227 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1795

That the indisposition or death of the witness is to be proven by others is strongly implied in the words used in Fry v.