Case law

Donald R. Schmidt, Inc. v. Planning Board

117 N.J. 167 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1989

Caruso v. New Jersey State Parole Board

117 N.J. 87 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 1989

Ryan v. New Jersey State Parole Board

117 N.J. 91 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 30, 1989

Steinberg v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 597 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1928

Burg v. Ackerman, 5 Id. 96. There is also a presumption that the action of the board of adjustment was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801. … This court will not disturb the action of the board of adjustment unless its action is shown by evidence to be wrong. Oxford Construction Co. v. Orange, 137 Atl. Rep. 545 .

Gauer v. Bloomfield Zoning Board of Adjustment

115 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 21, 1989

Cleveland v. Essex Public Road Board

31 N.J. Eq. 473 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1879

Lewis v. City of Elizabeth, 10 C. E. Gr. 298; Dusenberry v. Newark, Id. 295. Nor will the fact that the defendants threaten and intend to sell his property for non-payment of the assessment. … Jersey City v. Lembeck, 4 Stew. 255 , 270. The bill will be dismissed, with costs.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Henry

41 N.J. Eq. 388 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 15, 1886

See, especially, Lippincott v. Evens, 8 Stew. Eq. 553, and Halstead v. Westervelt, 14 Stew. Eq. 100. The demurrer will be allowed.

Bolger v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

81 N.J. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1979

Gilbert v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

6 N.J. Misc. 405 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Jul 1, 1928

Brown, and testimony having been taken, I do find and determine as follows: Petitioner, Ovid Gilbert, was employed as a porter and handy man at the Bergen Pines Isolation Hospital of Bergen county, located at Oradell, New

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

74 N.J. 266 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 7, 1977

Mullin v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

44 N.J. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1965

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J.L. 340 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

The act of April 21st, 1876, respecting county physicians (Rev., p. 817), authorized, in the first section thereof, any board of chosen freeholders of any county of this state, whenever said board should deem it best to do … Haines v. Freeholders of Camden, 18 Vroom 454 ; Simon v. Hoboken, 23 Id. 367; Roberson v. Bayonne, ante p. 325. The writ of certiorari must be dismissed, with costs.

McGarvey v. Board of Pension Commissioners

119 N.J.L. 390 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

Harrington v. Jersey City, *392 78 N. J. L. 610.” Board of Education v. Tait, 81 N. J. Eq. 162. In the present case, prosecutor had been demoted for a violation of the rules and regulations of the department. … Justice Case in Bader v. Crone, 116 N. J.

Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken

114 N.J.L. 273 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

Onka v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

125 N.J.L. 5 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 27, 1940

Fischer v. Nutley, 120 N. J. L. 290; Hammond v. Monmouth County, 117 Id. 11; Allas v. Rumson, 115 Id. 593.

Heaviland v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

64 N.J.L. 176 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1899

under the control of the board as to appointment and term. … Peterson v. Freeholders of Salem, 34 Vroom 57 .

Reimer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

96 N.J.L. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1921

on charges preferred by the board. … That a superior officer who has expressed dissatisfaction with the conduct of an inferior may sit as his judge on the trial of charges against him, there being na statutory prohibition, was held in Crane v.

Reimer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

97 N.J.L. 575 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1922

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Bugbee

98 N.J.L. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1923

In 1918 the legislature passed the act entitled “An act concerning charitable, correctional, reformatory and penal institutions, boards and commissioners, located and conducted in this state, which are supported in whole … Corp. v. Stafford, 70 N. J. L. 528. The act of 1918 was a reorganization of that department of the state government dealing with matters of a charitable, penal and correctional nature.

Nygren v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

86 N.J.L. 364 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1914

This ease is controlled by the views expressed in the case of Webster v. Freeholders, at the present term, ante p. 256. For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the present judgment will'be affirmed.