Nygren v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

Per Curiam.

This ease is controlled by the views expressed in the case of Webster v. Freeholders, at the present term, ante p. 256.

For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the present judgment will'be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Rone.