Case law

Portland Public School District No. 1J v. Portland Custodian Civil Service Board

198 Or. App. 11 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2005

Civil Service Board (board) from investigating plaintiffs implementation of that proposal. … See Skeen v.

State v. Kay

74 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1915

Brown, clerk of the *272 board, the securities mentioned. It was unanimously instructed by tbe board that the district attorney bring proceedings to enforce tbe order. … L.; Ball v. Lappius, 3 Or. 56 ; Mackin v. Portland Gas Co., 38 Or. 120 ( 61 Pac. 134 , 62 Pac. 20 , 49 L. R. A. 596); McGee v. Beckley, 54 Or. 253 ( 102 Pac. 303 , 103 Pac. 61 ); First Nat. Bank of Topeka v.

Smith v. Patterson

130 Or. 73 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1929

Carson v. … Brown, J., absent.

Colby v. Thompson

183 Or. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2002

v. … See Shelby v. Board of Parole, 140 Or App 102, 112 , 915 P2d 414 , rev den 324 Or 18 (1996).

Alder Slope Ditch Co. v. Moonshine Ditch Co.

90 Or. 385 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1918

corporation, even if considered as the act of a promoter, was ratified by the corporation by following up said notice by the construction of an irrigation system and user of water therein, and their claim before the water board … S.) 825); Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 233 ( 91 Pac. 453 ); Brown v. Webb, 60 Or. 526 ( 120 Pac. 387 ).

Hill v. Hill

323 Or. App. 458 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2022

Public Employees Retirement Board, 338 Or 145, 160-61, 108 P3d 1058 (2005) (detailing the benefit formulas). 2 Williams’s letter to Brown and Johnson stated: “Specifically, $172,516 of [husband’s] account as … See Spady v.

Wiggett v. Oregon State Penitentiary

85 Or. App. 635 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 1987

The only authority on which he relies is State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 445 .

Dabritz v. Board of Directors of Baker County School District No. 5J

13 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1973

Appellant does not question the board’s authority to deny him a contract renewal. Accordingly, we therefore assume the board had the right to deny appellant any contract. … George v. School Dist. No. 8R, 7 Or App 183 , 490 P2d 1009, 1015 (1971). ORS 342.805-342.960. Minutes of Senate Education Committee, Wednesday, March 20, 1957, regarding Senate Bill 365: “Mr. Tom Powers, Lane Co.

Hibbs v. Sedwick CMS (A180289)

340 Or. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 2025

State v. Browning, 282 Or App 1, 3, 386 P3d 192 (2016), rev den, 361 Or 311 (2017) (inter- nal quotation marks omitted). … See McClusky v.

Beamon v. SAIF

350 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2026

We review the board’s legal conclusions for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a); Curry Educational Service Dist. v. … Pedro v. SAIF, 313 Or App 34, 39, 495 P3d 183 (2021) (citing ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B)). The “otherwise compensable injury” refers to a medical con- dition, not a work event or accident. Id. (citing Brown v.

Columbia River-Longview Bridge Co. v. Wellington

140 Or. 413 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1932

From Swensen v. … J., Brown, Band, Belt, Campbell and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Coe v. McElligott

86 Or. App. 272 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1987

See Sappington v. Brown, 68 Or App 72 , 75 n 1, 682 P2d 775 , rev den 298 Or 238 (1984); Angus v. Joseph, 60 Or App 546 , 655 P2d 208 (1982), rev den 294 Or 569 , cert den 464 US 830 (1983). … But see McKinstry Co. v. Smith, 85 Or App 607 , 738 P2d 203 (1987).

State v. Oneill

256 Or. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 2013

We have since expressly relied upon Brown in the context of ORS 161.200. In State v. … Presumably, defendant’s contention is that the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown has somehow written language into OES 161.200. See Mastriano v.

T.D.F. v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

363 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 2018

Brown v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 21, 2023

Plaintiff, however, argues that the phrase "purports to show that Brown and the Company agree to arbitrate claims against each other." Pl.'s Opp. to PTRC's Mot. for Joinder ("Pl.' … PTRC cites to Franklin v.

Davidson v. Employment Division

63 Or. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

The Supreme Court granted review and reversed, sub nom Brown v. Adult and Family Services, 293 Or 6 , 643 P2d 1266 (1982). … This is a case of the latter type, with the remand being based upon the lack of evidentiary findings to support the Board’s legal conclusion. In Van Gordon v. Ore.

Nero v. City of Tualatin

142 Or. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1996

On review, the Board reinstated the Director’s award but did not grant a penalty. We reversed the Board’s holding as to the penalty. Nero v. … Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588 , 763 P2d 408 (1988). The correct legal inquiry is whether the employer had a legitimate doubt as to its liability.

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 12, 2023

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PETER DAVID BROWN, 3:23-cv-00398-AA Plaintiff … Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v.

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · May 6, 2024

Orn v. Astrue, 495 F.3d 625, 639 (9th Cir. 2007). … Id.; see also Woods v.

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 23, 2024

DISTRICT OF OREGON 7 MEDFORD DIVISION 8 ALESHA BROWN … EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets allowed under the 19 20 Treasury Offset Program (TOP), as discussed recently in Astrue v.