Opinion

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Court
District Court, D. Oregon
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.8%

The opinion

1 CHAD HATFIELD

Attorney at Law

2 Hatfield Law Office

8131 W Klamath Ct, Ste D

3

Kennewick, WA 99336

4 Telephone: (509) 378-3696

Attorney for Plaintiff

5

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

7 MEDFORD DIVISION

8

ALESHA BROWN,

9

10 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:23-cv-00160-HL

11 vs.

12

MARTIN O’MALLEY,

13 Commissioner of the Social Security ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Administration, PETITION FOR EAJA FEES

14

Defendant.

15

16

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff’s motion for an award of attorney fees pursuant to the

17

18 Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412. (Ct. Rec. 24.) Attorney CHAD

19 HATFIELD represents Plaintiff, United Stated Attorney for the District of Oregon, Natalie

20

Wight, Civil Division Chief, Kevin Danielson and Special Assistant United States Attorney

21

David Burdett, represent the Defendant. We have been in communication with the opposing

22

counsel and have made some changes per his request.

23

24 On December 5,2023, this Court issued its PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

25 JUDGMENT/ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

26 (Ct. Rec. 22/23). Plaintiff now moves for an award of attorney fees pursuant to EAJA (Ct. Rec.

27

24.)

28

1 The EAJA provides for an award of attorney fees to private litigants who both prevail in

2 civil actions (other than tort) against the United States and timely file a petition for fees. 28

3

U.S.C. §2412(d)(2)(A). Under the EAJA, the court shall award attorney fees to the prevailing

4

party unless it finds the government’s position was “substantially justified or that special

5

circumstances make such an award unjust.” 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(A).

6

7 Plaintiff seeks attorney fees of $6,022.77 based on an attorney fee rate of $234.95 per

8 hour for 2.0 hours in 2022, $244.62 per hour for 21.5 hours worked in 2023, and 1.2 hours

9

worked in 2024. Accordingly, after review,

10

IT IS ORDERED:

11

(1) The Plaintiff’s Motion (Ct. Rec. 24.) is GRANTED. The Commissioner is

12

13 directed to pay Plaintiff EAJA fees of $6,022.77.

14 (2) The award to plaintiff shall be delivered or otherwise transmitted to plaintiff’s

15 attorney of record. Address for the attorney for the Plaintiff:

16

Chad Hatfield

17 8131 W Klamath Ct, Ste D

Kennewick, WA 99336

18

(3) EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets allowed under the

19

20 Treasury Offset Program (TOP), as discussed recently in Astrue v. Ratliff, U.S.

21 (2010), 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2522 (2010). No costs or expenses are awarded.

22

(4) The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order, provide a copy to

23

plaintiff as the prevailing party, plaintiff’s counsel, and defendant’s counsel, and CLOSE the

24

file.

25

26 IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 DATED this 23rd day of A _p_r_i_l______ , 2024.

28

2 ANDREW D. HALLMAN

3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4

5

6

;

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

193

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR EAJA FEES 3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.