Case law

State v. Sutton

253 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1969

Hall v. Brown, 102 Or 389, 393 , 202 P 719 (1921); Manchester Assur. Co. v. Ore. R. R. Co., 46 Or 162, 166-167 , 79 P 60 , 69 LRA 475 (1905); Friendly v. Lee, 20 Or 202, 205 , 25 P 396 (1890). … Mason, Ehrman & Co. v. Lewis Est., 131 Or 242, 258 , 276 P 281 , 281 P 123 , 282 P 772 (1929); Fitzpatrick v. Sletten, 117 Or 173, 176, 242 P 1114 (1926); Hall v. Brown, supra; Manchester Assur. Co. v. Ore. R. R.

Kopacin v. Crown-Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.

62 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1912

Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 608 ( 101 Pac. 671 ) ; Geldard v. Marshall, 43 Or. 438 ( 73 Pac. 330 ). 4. … Clarke v. Holmes, 7 Hurl. & N. Rep. 937. 5.

Schuening v. J.R. Simplot & Co.

84 Or. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 8, 1987

See, e.g., Brown v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., 52 Or App 191 , 627 P2d 1291 (1981). 2 The referee stated that Graham’s report supported *626 the finding that claimant was medically stationary at the time of closure. … Mazama Plywood Co. v. Beattie, 62 Or App 355 , 661 P2d 109 (1983). 2 But see Martin v.

Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Board of County Com'rs of Clatsop County

351 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 2012

273 P.3d 135 (2012) 351 Or. 541 OREGON SHORES CONSERVATION COALITION v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF CLATSOP COUNTY. No. (S059579). Supreme Court of Oregon. January 12, 2012. Petition for Review Allowed. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Friends of Yamhill v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or. 219 , 264 P.3d 1265 (2011).

Palmer v. Willamette Val. S. Ry. Co.

88 Or. 322 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1918

"While waiting at the depot a standing train serves as an invitation to all intending passengers to board it, and the invitation carries with it an assurance that the passenger may board the train in safety: Jones v. … Rep. 462 ); Carr v. Eel River & E. R. Co., 98 Cal. 366 ( 33 Pac. 213 , 21 L. R. A. 354); Browne v. Raleigh & G. R. Co., 108 N. C. 34 ( 12 S. E. 958 ); Gannon v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., Co., 141 Iowa, 37 ( 117 N.

Lake County Board of Equalization v. Department of Revenue

257 Or. 244 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1970

was filed in the Tax Court to reverse and modify an order by the Department of Revenue under which the assessed value of the ZX Ranch for the tax year 1968-69 was reduced from $3,405,730, as established by the Lake County Board

Cook v. Zenon

107 Or. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1991

Plaintiff does not allege facts that show a “further imprisonment or restraint” under the first category in Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). Jones v. … See Miller v. Maass, 95 Or App 445, 447 , 769 P2d 788 (1989). *29 As to the other category of Penrod/Brown , plaintiff does not allege facts that, if true, require immediate judicial scrutiny.

Labor Force v. Frierson

169 Or. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 2000

Roseburg Forest Products v. … Brown, 159 Or App 440, 445-46 , 978 P2d 407 (1999); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).

State Ex Rel. Swalko v. Elliott

113 Or. 632 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1925

BROWN, J. … The defendants’ motion for judgment of non-suit, for the purposes of the motion, conceded the truthfulness of the testimony received into the record for plaintiff: Brown v. Sheedy, 90 Or. 74 ( 175 Pac. 613 ).

Astoria Marine Iron Works v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

270 F. 635 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1921

The motion to remand will be denied on the authority of Rosenberg Iron & Metal Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (recently decided by this court) 271 Fed. 956 . … Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. U. S. Shipping Board (D. C.) 268 Fed. 624 . Neither United States v. Strang et al., 254 U. S. -, 41 Sup. Ct. 165, 65 L. Ed. -; nor Salas v. United States, 234 Fed. 842 , 148 C. C.

Jones v. Thompson

156 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1998

Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978); see also Payton v. … Also, our decision in Meriweather v. Board of Parole, 140 Or App 415 , 915 P2d 467 (1996), is instructive on the issue of mootness.

South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of Commissioners

31 Or. App. 235 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 1977

That plan change decision was reversed in Sunnyside Neighborhood v. Clackamas Co. Comm., 280 Or 3 , 569 P2d 1063 (1977), thus also invalidating the zone change at issue here. Reversed and remanded.

Bald-Eagle v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2025

Reversed and remanded. 452 Bald-Eagle v. Board of Parole EGAN, J. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Union High School District No. 1 v. Linn County District Boundary Board

244 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1966

Oregon Constitution, Article VIII, § 3; Padberg, West et al v. Martin et al, 225 Or 135 , 357 P2d 255 (1960); School District No. 68 v. Hoskins et al, 194 Or 301 , 240 P2d 949 (1952); Campbell v. … “(d) Is not likely to adversely affect any contemplated reorganization under ORS 330.505 to 330.780.” *217 We held in School Dist. 7 v.

Butte Creek School District No. 67J v. Clackamas County District Boundary Board

88 Or. App. 89 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1987

Here, Clackamas Board’s order became final on September 9, when Marion Board concurred. See Central School (Beaman I) v. Marion District (A42081), 88 Or App 85 , 744 P2d 284 (1987). … In this case, the letter of State Board, in conjunction with the documents attached to the petition for judicial review, might constitute a final order of State Board. See Standard Ins. Co. v.

Hopkins v. Board of Parole

334 Or. App. 652 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 2024

Petitioner seeks judicial review from a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board). Petitioner’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. … See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.

Edwards v. Cavenham Forest Industries

312 Or. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 2021

The parties do not contest the board’s findings of historical fact. “We therefore take the facts from the board’s order, supplementing them with consistent facts from the record as necessary.” SAIF v. … See Brown v.

Nottage v. City of Portland

35 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1899

See, also, Donley v. City of Pittsburg, 147 Pa. St. 348 ( 30 Am. St. Rep. 738 , 23 Atl. 394 ); May v. Holdridge, 23 Wis. 93 ; Dill v. Roberts, 30 Wis. 178 ; In re Van Antwerp, 56 N. Y. 261 ; Brown v. … S. 687 ; Campbell v. City of Kenosha, 72 U. S. (5 Wall.) 194 ; Brown v. Mayor, etc., 63 N. Y. 239 ; The Clinton Bridge, 77 U. S. (10 Wall.) 454 .

Anderson v. Board of Parole

331 Or. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 2024

ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … State v. Hubbard, 290 Or App 640, 417 P3d 498, rev den, 363 Or 283 (2018); State v. Haynes, 168 Or App 565, 7 P3d 623, rev den, 331 Or 283 (2000).

Liston v. Board of Parole

332 Or. App. 274 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 24, 2024

We review the board’s order for legal error. Delavega v. Board of Parole, 222 Or App 161, 163, 194 P3d 159 (2008). … Board of Parole, 327 Or App 196, 532 P3d 1264, rev allowed, 371 Or 535 (2023), and Kragt v.