Case law

Jackson v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.

64 O.B.A.J. 3587 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 30, 1993

The Hospital was clearly within the Act’s protection when its personnel escorted the visitor out of the surgery area, seated him on the bed in the hallway, and then redirected their attention to the wife. … The Hospital was clearly responding to an apparent emergency that called for immediate action. THE COURT OF APPEALS’ OPINION IS VACATED AND THE TRIAL COURT’S JUDGMENT REINSTATED AND AFFIRMED.

Bonner v. Outlaw

552 F.3d 673 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jan 9, 2009

The district court denied Outlaw qualified immunity, concluding Bonner alleged the violation of a clearly established constitutional right. … B Bonner’s right to receive notice his packages were rejected was clearly established. This Court “has taken a broad view of what constitutes ‘clearly established lav/ for the purposes of a qualified immunity inquiry.”

Aurea E. Vazquez Rios v. Rafael Hernandez Colon, Etc.

819 F.2d 319 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 20, 1987

Certainly, the law was not in any sense “clearly established” to the contrary. … , have granted the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment on the basis of their qualified immunity.

David King v. Timothy Riley

76 F.4th 259 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 4, 2023

The prison guards on duty failed to violate a clearly established right so are entitled to qualified immunity. … And qualified immunity cares about violations of clearly established constitutional law, not clearly established prison policy.

Nosek v. Saipan Sea Ventures, Inc.

District Court, Northern Mariana Islands · Oct 10, 2017

Plaintiff, as the party 10 seeking to invoke jurisdiction, has the burden of establishing that jurisdiction exists. See Kokkonen 11 v. Guardian Life Ins. … of official immunity . . . may be resolved by Rule 12(b)(6) if clearly established by the 16 allegations within the complaint”).

Grigorescu v. Board of Trustees of the San Mateo County Community College District

District Court, N.D. California · May 24, 2024

“When the defendants are public officials asserting a qualified immunity 18 defense and the appealed issue is whether a given set of facts establishes that defendants violated 19 clearly established law,” the order … The 9 Ninth Circuit denied the principal qualified immunity, stating that the plaintiff’s “right to express 10 political views, even as a public school teacher, is clearly established.

Watson v. Cook

District Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 4, 2025

Once an officer pleads qualified immunity, the plaintiffhas the burden to establish that the officer violated the plaintiff s clearly established federal rights. Jd. at 1088. “This is a demanding standard.” … City of Palestine, 333 F.3d 621, 623 (Sth Cir. 2003) (“Qualified immunity protects officers from suit unless their conduct violates a clearly established constitutional right.”’).

Kompare v. Stein

801 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 4, 1986

The question on appeal is whether the defendants' qualified immunity protects them from suit, or more specifically, whether the defendants violated clearly established constitutional rights by allegedly violating a county … Qualified immunity shields government officials "from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known

Lees v. CDCR/SVSP-LVN Singsong

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2022

To determine whether an 1 violated a constitutional right, and (2) that right was clearly established at the time of the incident. 2 Pearson, 555 U.S. at 232. … City of Anaheim, 11 343 F.3d 1052, 1061 (9th Cir. 2003) (denying qualified immunity because it is clearly established 12 that crushing an arrestee on ground despite his repeated cries for air and despite fact that his

J.T.H. v. Spring Cook

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 1, 2022

Qualified immunity is another story. … Here, the complaint falls short of establishing that Cook violated a clearly established right. See id.

Morris v. Chatham County C.N.T Division

District Court, S.D. Georgia · Jul 14, 2020

Plaintiff contends that Defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity because the manner in which he conducted the search violated clearly-established law.7 (Id.) … was clearly established at the time of the incident.

Anne Marie Gennusa v. Brian Canova

748 F.3d 1103 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 8, 2014

Canova were not protected by qualified immunity. Det. Marmo and Sgt. … The district court also denied qualified immunity to Det. Marmo and Sgt. Canova.

Veeder v. Nutting

588 F. App'x 18 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 2014

Our jurisdiction, however, is “limited to circumstances where the qualified immunity defense may be established as a matter of law.” Escalera v. … The District Court also erred in not granting qualified immunity to defendants Hogan and Port for opening the suicide notes because they did not violate clearly established law. See Pearson v.

McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services

District Court, D. Kansas · Feb 16, 2024

This right likely does not exist, and certainly is not clearly estab- lished, so qualified immunity requires dismissal. See Pearson v. … Coats and Zmuda are therefore enti- tled to qualified immunity. See, e.g., Stewart v.

Boysen v. Peacehealth

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 19, 2024

Defendants in a Section 1983 action are entitled to qualified immunity from damages for civil liability if their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person … For purposes of qualified immunity, “[a] right is clearly established when it is sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right.” Rivas-Villegas v.

Pitts v. United States

228 F. Supp. 3d 412 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2017

Jones, 225 F.3d 468, 470 (4th Cir. 2000) (“Rule 41(e) does not contain a waiver of sovereign immunity.”); Pena v. … established Fourth Amendment rights”); Crawford v.

Texas Department of Public Safety and Steven McCraw in His Official Capacity as Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety v. Maria Luisa Mejia Sunuc, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Marcos Antonio Castro Estrada, and as Next Friend to L.M. and H.M., Minors

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Feb 3, 2022

Alternatively, DPS argued that it could conclusively establish that its troopers were entitled to official immunity, thereby cloaking DPS in derivative immunity. See DeWitt v. … Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 378–81 (2007) (holding that video evidence can conclusively establish that an officer is entitled to qualified immunity from an excessive force claim). 5 DPS’s primary argument on appeal is that

Brown v. Tromba

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 2026

City of Tulare, 107 F.4th 894, 898 (9th Cir. 2024) (“Qualified immunity protects government officials from liability under § 1983 unless (1) they violated a federal statutory or constitutional right, and (2) the unlawfulness … of their conduct was clearly established at the time.”

Christopher Bates v. Thomas Hadden

576 F. App'x 636 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 19, 2014

Because Bates did not establish that Officer Hadden violated his constitutional or statutory rights, Officer Hadden was entitled to qualified immunity. … City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (citation omitted).3 "Officials being sued under § 1983 are entitled to qualified immunity for actions that did not violate a clearly established constitutional

Katrina Reeves v. Howard Meddings

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 14, 2025

Reeves’s clearly established rights. … Reeves’ clearly established rights.