Case law

Cousins v. Lockyer

568 F.3d 1063 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 15, 2009

qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity protects government officials from civil liability if “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v.

Ryan v. Bell

District Court, N.D. New York · Jan 3, 2024

“Qualified immunity shields government officials from civil damages liability unless the official violated a statutory or constitutional right that was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.” … July 2, 2020) (finding corrections officer entitled to qualified immunity because he held an objectively reasonable belief his actions were lawful, particularly in light of that fact that “there is no clearly established

Laura Skop v. City of Atlanta, Georgia

485 F.3d 1130 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 3, 2007

Was the Violation Clearly Established? … The second qualified immunity inquiry is, in the context of this case, straightforward: our binding precedent clearly established, at the time of Skop’s arrest, that an arrest made without arguable probable cause violates

KIRBY v. BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE

District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 20, 2024

To overcome qualified immunity Plaintiff must establish “(1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct.” … Because there are no material facts in dispute that support that Plaintiff’s clearly established rights were violated, Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

Skehan v. Village of Mamaroneck

465 F.3d 96 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 26, 2006

If those facts would constitute a deprivation, the court should grant qualified immunity if (1) the legal right said to be violated was not clearly established at the time of the defendant’s conduct; or (2) the defendant’ … The individual defendants’ qualified immunity turns on whether they violated clearly established federal law; the county commission’s liability turns on the allocation of law enforcement power in Alabama.

Kirby v. City of Elizabeth City

388 F.3d 440 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 3, 2004

First, Chief Hampton and Lieutenant Koch are entitled to qualified immunity. … Government officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity from liability for civil damages to the extent that "their conduct does not violate clearly established stat- utory or constitutional

Charles v. Grief

522 F.3d 508 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 28, 2007

qualified immunity in which the trial court has determined that the factual dispute is “genuine”; only when denial of qualified immunity turns on whether a genuinely disputed fact is “material” are we authorized to review … unwarranted appeal of an interlocutory denial of qualified immunity.

Woodward Harbor LLC v. City of Mandeville

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 27, 2025

Sucette fails to plead facts sufficient to overcome the “clearly established” prong of Zuckerman’s qualified-immunity defense. “The ‘clearly established’ prong is difficult to satisfy.” Id. at 191 (citing Morrow v. … of clearly established law for qualified immunity analysis.”

CHANLEY v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Mar 30, 2023

The Officers argue that they're entitled to qualified immunity on that claim because "an arrestee's Fourth Amendment right to medical care . . . was not a clearly established right on October 28, 2019." … Qualified immunity "protects government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have

Brian Ballentine v. Christopher Tucker

28 F.4th 54 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 8, 2022

The district court concluded that Detective Tucker is entitled to qualified immunity because Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights were not clearly established at the time of their arrests. … A government officer is nevertheless entitled to qualified immunity if the plaintiff’s rights were not clearly established at the time of the alleged misconduct. See Pearson, 555 U.S. at 231–32.

Manna v. Cribari

District Court, D. Colorado · Jan 27, 2020

Early last year, the Supreme Court issued an opinion addressing the “clearly established” prong of a qualified immunity defense for a Fourth Amendment claim, in which the Court re- emphasized that “the clearly established … district court to rebut qualified immunity” and “[b]ecause Plaintiffs did not proffer clearly established authority that Ms.

Silverman v. Lane

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 30, 2020

No. 75 at 17. 25 The defense of qualified immunity protects “government officials . . . from liability 26 for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established … Furthermore, Ninth Circuit 15 precedent regarding the use of tasers indicates that qualified immunity protects officers 16 who were reasonably mistaken in their use based on the lack of a clearly established right.

Hemostemix, Inc. v. Accudata Solutions, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware · Feb 28, 2022

The facts pled by Aspire, considered in light of the contracts themselves, establish that Hemostemix took the actions a party normally takes when faced with what it feels is a breach of contract. … Lapina, 258 F.3d 156, 161 (3d Cir. 2001) (noting that the affirmative defense of qualified immunity “will be upheld on a 12(b)(6) motion only when the immunity is established on the face of the complaint.”

Nosek v. Saipan Sea Ventures, Inc.

District Court, Northern Mariana Islands · Oct 10, 2017

Plaintiff, as the party 10 seeking to invoke jurisdiction, has the burden of establishing that jurisdiction exists. See Kokkonen 11 v. Guardian Life Ins. … of official immunity . . . may be resolved by Rule 12(b)(6) if clearly established by the 16 allegations within the complaint”).

Kompare v. Stein

801 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 4, 1986

The question on appeal is whether the defendants' qualified immunity protects them from suit, or more specifically, whether the defendants violated clearly established constitutional rights by allegedly violating a county … Qualified immunity shields government officials "from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known

Lees v. CDCR/SVSP-LVN Singsong

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2022

To determine whether an 1 violated a constitutional right, and (2) that right was clearly established at the time of the incident. 2 Pearson, 555 U.S. at 232. … City of Anaheim, 11 343 F.3d 1052, 1061 (9th Cir. 2003) (denying qualified immunity because it is clearly established 12 that crushing an arrestee on ground despite his repeated cries for air and despite fact that his

J.T.H. v. Spring Cook

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 1, 2022

Qualified immunity is another story. … Here, the complaint falls short of establishing that Cook violated a clearly established right. See id.

Bonner v. Outlaw

552 F.3d 673 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jan 9, 2009

The district court denied Outlaw qualified immunity, concluding Bonner alleged the violation of a clearly established constitutional right. … B Bonner’s right to receive notice his packages were rejected was clearly established. This Court “has taken a broad view of what constitutes ‘clearly established lav/ for the purposes of a qualified immunity inquiry.”

Sherry Lintz Keith Lintz, Sr. Richele Nicole Jacobs Brian Allen Jacobs and Keith Lintz, Jr., by Next Friend Sherry Lintz v. Linda K. Skipski

25 F.3d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 25, 1994

The district court found defendant entitled to qualified immunity because the children’s federal constitutional due process right to be free from unnecessary harm in foster homes was not clearly established until late in … but under the facts of the case held that two years was more than enough time to satisfy the “clearly established” threshold.

Morris v. Chatham County C.N.T Division

District Court, S.D. Georgia · Jul 14, 2020

Plaintiff contends that Defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity because the manner in which he conducted the search violated clearly-established law.7 (Id.) … was clearly established at the time of the incident.