Case law

Brown v. Blackstone Consulting Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 17, 2021

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). … Finnell v. Seismic, 67 P.3d 339, 344 (Okla. 2003). In Embry v.

Brown v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2022

Williams v. … Wilson v. Astrue, 602 F.3d 1136, 1145 (10th Cir. 2010) (quoting Hargis v.

Wood v. Lydick

523 P.2d 1082 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1974

Lydick v. Brown, 516 P.2d 239 (1973). Recount is therefore a creature of the statutory law and is provided only for candidates for elective office and this by virtue of 26 O. S.1971 §§ 391 and 392. … Lydick v.

City of Picher v. Board of Com'rs of Ottawa County

166 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1933

Briefs were filed before the decision of this court in Brown, County Treas., v. Board of Ed. of City of Duncan, 148 Okla. 97 , 298 P. 249 ; and Board of Co. Com’rs v. City of Marlow, 148 Okla. 126 , 298 P. 255 . … CULLISON, V. O. X, and S WIND ALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, XL, concur. BAYLESS and WELCH, XL, absent.

First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

530 P.2d 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1974

See also Jones v. Blaine, 149 Okl. 153 , 300 P. 369, 370 (1931). … The Board should compute the levy and advertise the estimate as set forth in 68 O.S.1971, § 2487(3) which states that the Board shall: “Examine the content of the estimate of needs, and if the governing board has failed to

Freeman v. Board of Medical Examiners for Southern District of Indian Territory

20 Okla. 610 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1908

such board. … The reason for it is well stated in Kidd v. Morrison, 62 N. C. 38 . This case involved the title to a slave, which at the time it was commenced was a proper subject of barter and trade.

Green v. Tulsa County, Excise Board

187 Okla. 377 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. … Co. v. Cowden, Co. Treas., 184 Okla. 260 , 86 P. 2d 776 , that the Court of Tax Review did not have jurisdiction of the controversy. See, also, Protest of First National Bank of Guthrie, 136 Okla. 141 , 276 P. 766 .

State Ex Rel. State Board of Official Shorthand Reporters v. Isbell

62 O.B.A.J. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1990

SIMMS, Justice: Ken Pierce, Chairman of the State Board of Examiners of Official Shorthand Reporters (Board) filed a formal complaint against Respondent, Kenneth Isbell, a Certified Shorthand Reporter, seeking revocation … he was a member of the Board, in the following manner: I.

BOARD OF EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST NO. 1, TULSA v. Wright

460 P.2d 422 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1969

Parlor v. John Mongold Drive-In Cafe, 204 Okl. 458 , 230 P.2d 887 ; Rolen v. Callicutt et al., 204 Okl. 250 , 228 P.2d 1010 ; Plaza Grill v. Webster, 182 Okl. 533 , 78 P.2d 818 ; Melton v. … See Woods v. Perryman, Okl., 452 P.2d 588 .

Lund v. Nichols

177 Okla. 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1936

Woodworth, 89 Okla. 192 , 214 P. 1077 ; Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co., 72 Okla. 308 . 182 P. 247 ; Lee, Treas., v. Roberts, 3 Okla. 106 , 41 P. 595 ; Brown v. … Co., 137 Okla. 186 , 279 P. 319 ; Oklahoma Coal Co. v. Atkinson, 121 Okla. 59 , 247 P. 366 ; Schaffer v. Board of Com’rs of Muskogee County, 33 Okla. 288 , 124 P. 1069 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v.

Brown v. Blackstone Consulting Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 5, 2021

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). … Brown and Blackstone were jointly represented. See Cantu v. Worley et al., Case No. CIV-12-129- R at Doc. No. 110 (W.D. Okla.

Brown v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 6, 2021

Brown found a job, that she could hold the job because of the effects of her combined impairments. . . . … Brown’s medical condition. The magistrate also suggests that the reduced RFC sufficiently captured the effects of Ms. Brown’s obesity . . . .

Bodine v. McDaniel. Auto Co.

69 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1918

Friend, County Atty., v. Cummings et al., 47 Okla. 44 , 147 Pac. 161 , this court, speaking through ihe late M¡r. Justice Brown, says in the syllabus: “Where the return to.' … In Hopley v. Benton, 38 Okla. 223 , 132 Pac 808 , an analogous question was determined by this court in an opinion by Mr.

Traders Compress Co. v. Board of Review, Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com.

203 Okla. 564 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1950

This is an appeal by Traders Compress Company from an administrative order made by Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission. … Glass et al. v. Banfield Bros. Packing Co., 168 Okla. 217 , 32 P. 2d 713 ; Douglas v. Baker, 167 Okla. 348 , 29 P. 2d 619 ; Campbell v. Reynolds, 167 Okla. 365 , 29 P. 2d 941 ; State ex rel. Rives v.

State Ex Rel. Fent v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

74 O.B.A.J. 963 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2003

Brown v. Nicholson, 1997 OK 32, ¶5 , 935 P.2d 319, 321 . See also Kluver v. Weatherford Hosp. … York v.

Opinion No. 74-141 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1975

In the case of Brown v. … Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corporation v.

Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Foss Reservoir Master Conservancy District

527 P.2d 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1974

This claim was denied by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board (Board). On August 12, 1969, the Board issued an order which determined the vested service rights in the Washita River System. … See Kasner v. Stamire, 195 Okl. 80 , 155 P.2d 230, 232 (1945). Affirmed. All Justices concur. . Powers and duties transferred to Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board.’

American Southwest Properties, Inc. v. Tulsa County Board of Equalization

338 P.3d 647 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 2014

T4 Appeal to the district court of an order of a county equalization board fixing the assessed valuation of property for ad valorem tax purposes is de novo. 68 O.S. 2011 2880.1(A); Jackson v. … Co. v.

Lowden v. Texas County, Excise Board

187 Okla. 365 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1940

Co. v. Cowden, County Treas., supra, brought its action under section 12665, O. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, HURST, and DANNER, JJ., concur. CORN and GIBSON, JJ., absent.

State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Pate

555 P.2d 1040 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 19, 1976

Delfeld v. City of Tulsa, 191 Okl. 541 , 131 P.2d 754 ; Morse v. Board of County Comm’rs, 169 Okl. 600 , 38 P.2d 945 . See also Swatek v. Board of Regents, Okl., 535 P.2d 295 . … Brown v. Neustadt, supra. We conclude trial court had no jurisdiction to grant jury trial. Jurisdiction assumed, writ of prohibition granted. All Justices concur.