Opinion

Traders Compress Co. v. Board of Review, Oklahoma Employment SEC. Com.

  • 203 Okla. 564
  • 224 P.2d 268
  • 1950 OK 274
  • 1950 Okla. LEXIS 685
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Oct 31, 1950
Status
Published
Author
Welch
On the bench
Welch, Arnold, Corn, Halley, Johnson, O'Neal, Gibson, Luttrell
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 65.7%

The opinion

WELCH, J.

This is an appeal by Traders Compress Company from an administrative order made by Board of Review of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the questions presented by the appeal are moot. A response has been filed in which it is shown that by reason of the lapse of time the relief sought by the plaintiff in error can no longer be obtained.

We have held that the Supreme Court will not attempt to determine abstract, hypothetical, or moot questions, but, where it is made to appear that the qúestíons brought up for review have become moot, the proceedings will be

*565

dismissed. Glass et al. v. Banfield Bros. Packing Co., 168 Okla. 217 , 32 P. 2d 713 ; Douglas v. Baker, 167 Okla. 348 , 29 P. 2d 619 ; Campbell v. Reynolds, 167 Okla. 365 , 29 P. 2d 941 ; State ex rel. Rives v. Halley, 167 Okla. 504 , 30 P. 2d 915 ; Hudson v. Moore, 169 Okla. 12 , 35 P. 2d 886 .

Appeal dismissed.

ARNOLD, V. C. J., and CORN, HALLEY, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur. GIBSON and LUTTRELL, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.