Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

9.53s

  • Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa County

    173 Okla. 375 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

    Faught v. City of Sapulpa, supra. It is contended by the protestee that the holding in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County v. … Wood et al. v. Kimbrell et al., 152 Okla. 239 , 5 P. (2d) 366 ; Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. First Nat. Bank of Berwyn et al., 159 Okla. 283 , 15 P. (2d) 6 .

    Overruled in part by Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise Board, 183 Okla. 295 (1938)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. CoreCivic Cimarron Corrections

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 31, 2024

    at 556; see also Ashcroft v. … See Peoples v. CCA Det.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vickers v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement Board

    120 P.3d 862 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 2005

    The Board's 1994 enhancement of retirement credits was retroactive to 1988 and done pursuant to a settlement agreement reached in a case filed in 1991 by three police officers against the Board. Swindler v. … In Kinzy v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Police Pension & Retirement System v. Kern

    366 P.2d 415 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1961

    See the discussions in Police Pension and Relief Board of City and County of Denver v. McPhail, 139 Colo. 330 , 338 P.2d 694 ; Robinson v. … Police Pension Board, 85 Ariz. 384 , 339 P.2d 739 ; Police Pension Board for City of Tucson v. Denney, 84 Ariz. 394 , 330 P.2d 1 ; Terry v. City Of Berkeley, 41 Cal.2d 698 , 263 P.2d 833, 836 ; State ex rel. Stringer v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. CoreCivic Cimarron Corrections

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2024

    Brown brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking relief for alleged constitutional violations during his incarceration at the Cimarron Correctional Facility. On October 31, 2024, U.S. … Cassanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #48], GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Skouby v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 60

    143 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1930

    Doctors Oil Co. v. Adair, 83 Okla. 53 , 200 Pac. 858 ; Teter v. Board of Education, 85 Okla. 16 , 204 Pac. 129 ; Drummond v. City of Ada, 86 Okla. 32 , 206 Pac. 200 ; Atkins v. Page, 86 Okla. 308 , 208 Pac. 824 . … Teter v. Board of Education; Drummond v. City of Ada, supra.” That rule has been followed by this court, and in Simms v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. North

    191 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1942

    The bondholder relies on Schuman v. Board of County Commissioners, 184 Okla. 339 , 87 P. 2d 151 , which holds that a valid resale to the county extinguishes the ad valorem tax lien. … S. 1941 §1; State v. Passmore, above.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Funderburk v. Oklahoma State & Education Employees Group Insurance Board

    268 P.3d 556 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 2011

    City of Tulsa v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Board, 1998 OK 92, ¶ 12 , 967 P.2d 1214, 1219 . … Hill v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

    61 O.B.A.J. 3027 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1990

    For the earlier appeal see Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … See Magnolia Pipeline Company v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, infra note 14, 167 P.2d at 888; Board of Educ., Vici Pub. Schools v. Morris, Okl., 656 P.2d 258, 261 [1983], . Magnolia Pipeline Company v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Estate of King v. Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners

    146 P.3d 833 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 2006

    In State Board of Public Affairs v. … Stephenson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Atlas Life Ins. v. Board of Education of City of Tulsa

    83 Okla. 12 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1921

    In Davidson v. … In French v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • School Dist. No. 7 v. Board of Com'rs of Creek County

    135 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1928

    S. 1921; Railway Co. v. … The contentions herein by the plaintiff have Keen recently decided against it in the case of Board of Education of City of Sapulpa v. Board of Commissioners of Creek County, 127 Okla. 132 , 260 Pac. 22 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Carter County

    164 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1933

    X, CULLISON, V. O. X, and SWINDALL, McNE'ILL, BAYLESS, BUSBY, and WELCH, JX, concur. OSBORN, J., absent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cain v. Yukon Public Schools, District I-27

    556 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1983

    Board of Education of Prince George’s County, 623 F.2d 893 (4th Cir. 1980) ; Foster v. … Section 794 constitutes an across-the-board requirement of nondiscrimination in all federally-assisted programs. New Mexico Association for Retarded Citizens v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Assessment of Tradesmen's State Bank for 1917

    82 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1921

    The identical questions involved herein have been passed upon by this court since the filing of the appeal herein in three separate and distinct cases, to wit: Board of Equalization v. … First State, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 ; Brown v. Hennessey, 78 Okla. *75 141, 189 Pac. 355 ; Board of Equalization of Kingfisher Oounty v. People’s National Bank, 79 Okla. 312 , 193 Pac. 622 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs of Carter Cty. v. Sch. Dist. No. 71

    135 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

    No. 7, Creek County, v. Board of Commissioners, Creek County, No. 18373, decided February 7, 1928, 135 Okla. 1 , 275 Pac. 292 (rehearing denied Dec. 4, 1928), is decisive of the issue herein.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Independent School District No. 53 v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 52

    413 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1975

    Austin v. State Board of Education, 497 P.2d 218 (Okl.1972). … Austin v. State Board of Education, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Ardmore ex rel. Firemen's Relief & Pension Board v. Ozment

    467 P.2d 502 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1970

    In re Ross, 201 Okl. 476 , 207 P.2d 254 , and Roberts v. Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief & Pension Fund, Okl., 292 P.2d 408 . … Malone v. Mueller, 328 Ill.App. 593 , 66 N.E.2d 516 . The cited case is distinguishable from the present case both in facts and in law.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Custer County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

    201 Okla. 528 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1949

    Reference is made to the power of county excise boards to allocate millage as distinguished from the power granted by statute to such boards to levy or approve a levy of taxes. … Tulsa County Excise Board v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. State Board of Barber Examiners v. Gill

    189 Okla. 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1941

    See the case of Bankers Union Life Insurance Co. v. … See Conner, County Treasurer, v. Battles, 184 Okla. 351 , 87 P. 2d 121 . The judgment, insofar as it pertains to the foregoing order, is reversed. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.