Opinion

Brown v. CoreCivic Cimarron Corrections

Court
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 9, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 33.2%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

QUINCY D. BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) No. CIV-23-650-HE

)

CORECIVIC CIMARRON )

CORRECTIONS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Plaintiff Quincy D. Brown brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking

relief for alleged constitutional violations during his incarceration at the Cimarron

Correctional Facility. On October 31, 2024, U.S. Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell

issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the court grant defendants’ motion

to dismiss, dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety without prejudice, and decline to

exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state claims, to the extent that he has

raised any. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation

by November 22, 2024. No objection has been filed. Plaintiff has therefore waived his

right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the report. Cassanova

v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #48],

GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. #43], DECLINES to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state law claims, and DISMISSES plaintiff’s

complaint in its entirety without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 9th day of December, 2024.

lhe cote

JO ATON

~D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.