Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.70s
Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees
77 N.J. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 5, 1978
J. 54, 55 (1970); General Public Loan Corp. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 13 N. J. 393, 401 (1953); Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. Board of Review of N. J. Unemployment Compensation Commission, 1 N. J. 545, 554 (1949). … Co. v. Board of Review, supra, 1 N. J. at 553] If Peper was not promoted because she was a woman, she was denied the same right to acquire property that is guaranteed males under Art. I, para. 1.
Cited 334 timesPublishedSteinberg v. Board of Adjustment, C.
106 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929
Having procured his plans and specifications of the building to be prepared, he submitted them to the board of tenement house supervision, and that board approved them. … This statute validated pre-existing zoning ordinances passed by the various municipalities of the state; and it was held by the Supreme Court in Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 489; 142 Atl.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBirkfield Realty Co. v. Board of Commissioners
8 N.J. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1951
Cited 2 timesPublishedNo opinion textWilliams v. New Jersey State Parole Board
336 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 2000
WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 9, 2000. Decided June 6, 2000. *748 J. … Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 154 N.J. 19, 25 , 711 A. 2d 260 (1998).
Cited 39 timesPublishedState v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
37 N.J.L. 254 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1874
The certiorari in this case brings up a bill presented by one of the coroners of the county of Hudson,, against the board of chosen freeholders of that county, and. the resolution of the board ordering the bill paid. … In my opinion, such a rule would restrict the power of the board within too narrow limits.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBrown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.
101 N.J. Super. 299 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1968
BROWN, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PHYLLIS BROWN AND JULIE BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JACK E. MEREDITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … Savage, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney). Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHeaden v. Jersey City Board of Education
212 N.J. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 2012
Plaintiff is employed by the defendant Jersey City Board of Education (Board) 1 as a food service worker on a full-time ten-month basis. … See State Troopers Fraternal Ass’n of N.J. v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Englewood Teachers Ass'n
64 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1973
We cer.tilled before argument there and heard the matters along ■with Dunellen Board of Education v. Dunellen Education Association, 64 N. J. 17 (1973) which was decided today. Pursuant to N. J. S. … Clifton v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 28 N. J. 411, 421 (1958). In any event it is to be anticipated that the burdens will be minimal after a number of guideline opinions are handed down. Reversed.
Cited 57 timesPublished214 N.J. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 2013
See Vas v. … Co. v. Borough of S.
Cited 172 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. O'Hern
161 N.J. Super. 274 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1978
Briefly stated, the contentions are as follows: The County of Essex, through its board of freeholders and the Essex County Improvement Authority (hereinafter, plaintiffs), have asked this court to enjoin the Department *278
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew Jersey State Parole Board v. Byrne
93 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 11, 1983
The Parole Board complied. Both defendants appealed to the Appellate Division. That court disposed of Byrne first. New Jersey State Parole Board v. *199 Byrne, 182 N.J.Super. 540 (1982). … In Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 7, 11 , 99 S.Ct. at 2103-2104, 2105-2106 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 675, 677 , the Supreme Court relied on Board of Regents v.
Cited 87 timesPublishedPalmyra Board of Education v. Hansen
56 N.J. Super. 567 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 1959
Super. 567 (1959) 153 A.2d 393 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF PALMYRA IN THE COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. … See Hering v. State Board of Education, supra . For the reasons stated, the motion is denied.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMcDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
99 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1923
L., pp. 371, 378), it became the duty of the .board to make an appropriation; holding that the words “may * * * make appropriations therefor” are mandatory. … Seiple v. Elizabeth, 27 N. J. L. 407; Hugg v. Camden, 39 Id. 620, 622; Central Land Co. v. Bayonne, 56 Id. 297, 300; Fagen v Hoboken, 85 Id. 297.
Cited 6 timesPublishedState v. Board of License & Excise
48 N.J.L. 438 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1886
This writ brings up the proceeding of the board of license and excise of the city of Trenton, in granting a license to one James "V.' … Tiger v. Morris Common Pleas, 13 Vroom 631 . That this legislation is of a character regulating the internal affairs of cities has been repeatedly decided. The action of the board in granting the license is reversed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSchwartz v. Essex County Board of Taxation
130 N.J.L. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1943
The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on certiorari is not so limited. ' Chief Justice Brogan said in Dulce Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation, 124 N. J. … Camden, 95 Id. 190; Breen Iron Works v. Richardson, 115 Id. 305; Degenring v. Kimble, 115 Id. 379; Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 125 Id. 37; Licker v. Martin Box Co., 127 Id. 136. The judgment is affirmed.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
38 N.J. 33 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1962
See Becker v. Adams, 37 N. J. 337, 340 (1962); Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N. J. L. 353, 361 (E. & A. 1941). … Com. v. Jersey City, 93 N. J. Eq. 550, 553 (Ch. 1922). The Board refers to N. J. S. A. 27:16-31 which states that it may adopt regulations for the protection of roads under its control, and to B.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Corn Exchange National Bank, C., Co.
136 N.J. Eq. 430 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 5, 1945
Brown, deceased, and a declaration of complainant's rights thereunder. … Snyder v. Warbasse ( Court of Chancery ), 11 N.J. Eq. 463 , 473 .
Modified by Brown v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. of Philadelphia, 137 N.J. Eq. 507 (1946)Cited 4 timesPublishedMonks v. New Jersey State Parole Board
58 N.J. 238 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1971
Puchalski v. N. J. State Parole Board, supra, 55 N. J. 113; see Menechino v. Oswald, 430 P. 2d 403 (2 Cir. 1970); Schawartzberg v. United States Board of Parole, 399 F. 2d 297 (10 Cir. 1968); Briguglio v. N. Y. … Assn. v. Howell, 24 N. J. 488, 499 (1957). In White v. Parole Board of State of N. J., 17 N. J. Super. 580 (App.
Cited 39 timesPublishedCAROL CRISPINO VS. TOWNSHIP OF SPARTA (L-0500-16, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 6, 2019
N.J.R.E. 101(a)(3) ("proceedings before administrative agencies shall not be governed by the [R]ules"); N.J.S.A. 50:55D-10(e) (providing planning boards are not subject to the Rules); Baghdikian v. … Div. 1991) (stating that a zoning board "cannot be equated with courts" and "procedural safeguards employed in judicial proceedings" should not be "imported wholesale" into proceedings before a land use board (quoting
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSportsman 300 v. Board of Commissioners
42 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 1956
Caruso v. Jersey City, Bulletin 694, Item 1; Re Butera, Bulletin 606, Item 4; Roey v. Hock, Bulletin 758, Item 2. … Hudson Bergen County Retail Liquor Stores Ass’n v. Board of Com’rs of City of Hoboken, 135 N. J. L. 502 (E. & A. 1947); In re Schneider, 12 N. J. Super. 449, 456 (App. Div. 1951); Mazza v. Cavicchia, 15 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna