Opinion

Brown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.

  • 101 N.J. Super. 299
  • 244 A.2d 310
Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
Jun 11, 1968
Status
Published
On the bench
Judges Sullivan, Foley and Leonard
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.8%

The opinion

101 N.J. Super. 299 (1968)

244 A.2d 310

EVELYN G. BROWN, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PHYLLIS BROWN AND JULIE BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JACK E. MEREDITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 27, 1968.

Decided June 11, 1968.

*300 Mr. Howard H. Kestin argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Hoffmann & Humphreys, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Savage, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

We are in full agreement with the trial court's ruling, reported at 96 N.J. Super. 91 ( Law Div. 1967), that the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., does not apply to an accident occurring outside the State of New Jersey, even though the vehicle, the operation of which allegedly caused the accident, was an uninsured automobile registered in this State.

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.