Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

8.00s

  • Brown v. Brown

    26 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    65 A.D.2d 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    331 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1992

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    12 Ohio Law. Abs. 698 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1932

    Brown had left him does not present, we think, a strong case on the part of the plaintiff in error. The deposit, according to the testimony of Mrs. … Brown and that she received the sum above stated from said estate. While this affidavit tends to detract from the testimony of Mrs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    23 N.Y.S. 1155 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 26, 1893

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    230 A.D. 716 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1930

    Order denying motion of defendants Brown and Swasey for leave to serve a conditional cross complaint affirmed, without costs. … the denials contained in their answer, facts showing that tho trustee misappropriated and used in the purchase of the property in question the funds of the trust created for the appellants’ benefit by the will of Augusta Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    237 A.D. 881 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1933

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    148 N.Y.S. 1107 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    163 A.D. 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    277 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 1950

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 418 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    216 A.D. 725 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    5 Thomp. & Cook 691 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    104 N.Y.S. 1123 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 26, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    3 Shan. Cas. 86 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

    This canse of Simeon Cornick and wife v. Mary Brown et al. is referred *87 to in- this bill, and asked to be made exhibits and parts thereof. … See [Beeler v. Dunn], 3 Head, 90 , 91. In Roseborough v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    34 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1854

    . *435 This action in debt for $1167 86 was instituted in the circuit court of Davidson, by Brown & McCullough, against "Win. L. Brown, the defendant below.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    480 So. 2d 527 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    32 S.D. 216 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1913

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    12 S.D. 21 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1899

    defendants kept and retained said wheat, and failed, refused, and neglected to deliver said wheat to plaintiff, or to pay her the market price therefor. ” After the summons had been served in Hutchinson county on the defendant Brown … As the service upon the defendant Brown was confessedly good, appellant’s motion to dismiss the action would not be entertainable in the absence of the following statute, within *23 which, the case clearly comes: ‘ ‘The summons

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    20 S.C. Eq. 363 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Feb 15, 1847

    Brown,” and in his answer to the complainant’s former bill, he not only admits the trust, but indignantly repels the insinuation that he had, at any time, disavowed his fiduciary relation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.