Case law

Brown v. Penrod

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 19, 2021

BROWN, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) … Broadway v. Norris, 193 F.3d 987, 990 (8th Cir. 1999). Upon review of the record and Plaintiff’s present motion, the Court declines to alter or amend the judgment.

Famous v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

433 S.W.3d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2014

ORDER PER CURIAM: Ray Famous appeals the circuit court’s granting summary judgment for the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole in a declaratory judgment action. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Fedra Ekres v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2022

The Division of Employment Security ("Division") advances the same argument on appeal, relying on Board of Education of City of St. Louis v. Labor and Industrial Relations, 633 S.W.2d 126 (Mo. App. … See Lentz v. Home Sec. of Am., 380 S.W.3d 1, 6 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012) ("Unlike in Board of Education, . . .

Gordon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

342 S.W.3d 926 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2011

Drury Displays, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

832 S.W.2d 330 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1992

Board of Adjustment, 768 S.W.2d 624, 627 (Mo.App.1989). We review the decision of the Board, not the judgment of the circuit court. Sandbothe v. City of Olivette, 599 S.W.2d 38, 39 (Mo.App.1980). … Const. of Missouri, Art V, § 2.

Egan v. Missouri State Board of Registration

437 S.W.3d 351 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2014

Robert Egan appeals from the circuit court’s judgment affirming the discipline imposed by the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (“Board”) after a finding by the Administrative Hearing Commission (“AHC”) of

Citizens State Bank v. State Banking Board

602 S.W.2d 895 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1980

See Marshfield Community Bank v. State Banking Board, 496 S.W.2d 17, 28 (Mo.App.1973). It is not required for the validity of administrative findings that they go into eviden-tiary detail. Glasnapp v. … The Commissioner and the Board are charged under the holding of Central Bank of Clayton v.

Bledsoe v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

448 S.W.3d 352 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2014

ORDER Per curiam: Michael Bledsoe appeals pro se the grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole on his petition for declaratory judgment. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Mays v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

454 S.W.3d 909 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 2015

ORDER PER CURIAM: Dallas Mays appeals the summary judgment of the trial court in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole in his declaratory judgment action.

Fults v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

857 S.W.2d 388 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1993

Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 429 , 107 S.Ct. 2446, 2450 , 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987), (quoting Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. (Dall.) 386 , 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798)). … Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 377-78 , 107 S.Ct. 2415, 2420-21 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987). Here, Fults’ due process claim lacks merit.

Langston v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

391 S.W.3d 473 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2012

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Parole Board. This appeal by Langston followed. Appellate review of the grant of summary judgment is de novo. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. … See McDermott v.

Minion v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

411 S.W.3d 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2013

Hawkes v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

410 S.W.3d 267 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2013

ORDER PER CURIAM: Walter Hawkes appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Cole County granting the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in his declaratory judgment action against the Missouri Board

Garr v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

211 S.W.3d 191 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2007

Craig v. Missouri Department of Health, 80 S.W.3d 457, 459 (Mo. banc 2002). … Armstrong v. Cape Girardeau Physician Associates, 49 S.W.3d 821, 824 (Mo.App.2001), McGuire v. Director of Revenue, 174 S.W.3d 87, 89 (Mo.App.2005).

Lawrence v. Board of Police Com'rs

604 F. Supp. 1229 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1985

Louis Board of Police Commissioners can only be obtained by suing its individual members. Sparks v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, No. 84-384C(3) (E.D.Mo., Apr. 25, 1984); Best v. … Defendants also argue for the dismissal of the Board members from the state law claim in Count I on the theory that respondeat superior is inapplicable. Reenie v.

Slate v. Boone County Board of Adjustment

810 S.W.2d 361 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 1991

Co. v. Board of Zoning Adj., 771 S.W.2d at 951 . “Practical difficulty” is a slightly less rigorous standard than “unnecessary hardship.” Matthew v. … See; e.g. 165 Augusta St. v. Collins, 9 N.J. 259 , 87 A.2d 889 (1952); Celentano, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 149 Conn. 671 , 184 A.2d 49 (1962).

Kaczynski v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

349 S.W.3d 354 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2011

Lute v. … Point V: “Seriousness of the Offense” In Point V, Kaczynski asserts that the trial court erred in granting the *363 Board’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in that the Board’s denial of parole based upon the “seriousness

HOLLINSWORTH v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

365 S.W.3d 265 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2012

a declaration that he had the right to appeal the Board’s decision not to place him on parole. … Having reviewed the record, we conclude that there is no genuine issue as to the material facts and that the Board was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ridinger v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

189 S.W.3d 658 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2006

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Board. Mr. Ridinger filed this appeal. Standard of Review Appellate review of a summary judgment is de novo. Boersig v. Mo. … In Irvin v. Kempker, 152 S.W.3d 358, 362 (Mo.App.

Charron v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

403 S.W.3d 692 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2013

Char-ron’s current suit alleges that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole has violated his rights in connection with its determinations as to his eligibility for parole and/or conditional release.