Opinion

Brown v. Penrod

Court
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Filed
Oct 19, 2021
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

GEORGE E. BROWN, JR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 1:17-CV-00026-AGF

)

BOBBY PENROD and JANE DOE, )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment

under Rule 60(b). Doc. 68. Rule 60(b) provides for extraordinary relief only upon an

adequate showing of exceptional circumstances. U.S. Xpress Enters., Inc. v. J.B. Hunt

Transp., Inc., 320 F.3d 809, 815 (8th Cir. 2003). It is not intended to be a vehicle for

seeking reconsideration of merit arguments that were previously considered by the court.

Broadway v. Norris, 193 F.3d 987, 990 (8th Cir. 1999).

Upon review of the record and Plaintiff’s present motion, the Court declines to

alter or amend the judgment. Plaintiff’s arguments as to the relative reliability of

particular individuals’ statements in this case were previously examined by the Court at

length, not only in its ruling on summary judgment (Doc. 57) but also again on Plaintiff’s

motion for reconsideration (Doc. 58). Plaintiff does not point to any mistake, newly

discovered evidence, fraud, or other exceptional circumstance justifying relief from

judgment.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment is

DENIED. Doc. 68.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue.

AUDREY G; LEIesIG C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 19th day of October 2021.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.