Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

8.47s

  • Allied Mutual Insurance Co. v. Brown

    105 S.W.3d 543 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 13, 2003

    On April 21, 1991, Kimberly Brown (hereinafter, “Brown”) was attacked by a pack of dogs while riding her mule down a gravel country road. … In support of its motion, Insurer filed depositions of Brown, Sheila Hoaglin, and an affidavit by Brandi Ray.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fortenberry v. Board of Education

    495 S.W.3d 177 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2016

    Fortenberry appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of her employer, the Board of Education of Hazelwood, on her racial discrimination lawsuit. We affirm.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Regents v. Palmer

    356 Mo. 946 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1947

    Co. v. Fowler, 113 Mo. 458 , 20 S.W. 1069 ; Galloway v. … Kendall v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. Special Administrative Board

    525 S.W.3d 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM Jasmine Armstrong appeals from the trial court’s “Order and Judgment” granting summary judgment in favor of the Special Administrative Board of the Transitional School District of the City of St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

    85 Mo. 123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

    Smith v. Railroad Co., 53 Mo. 338 , is a case precisely similar to this. Kinser v. Shands, 52 Mo. 326 ; Garnett v. Rodgers, 52 Mo. 145 ; Laughlin v. January, 59 Mo. 383 . All concur, except Henry, C. J., absent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Wilson

    216 Mo. 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1909

    This is one of the cases referred to and tried with the case of this plaintiff v. A. C. Wilson, ante, page 215. … [State ex rel. v. Hurt, 113 Mo. 1 . c. 96; State ex rel. v. Bank, 144 Mo. 1 . c. 384; Thomas v. Chapin, 116 Mo. 1 . c. 399; State ex rel. v. Bank, 120 Mo. 161 ; State ex rel. v. Harper, 83 Mo. 670 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Dickerson

    136 S.W.3d 539 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2004

    Brown (Brown) seeks a writ of prohibition against the Honorable Mary Dickerson (Respondent) to prevent enforcement of Respondent’s order that Brown answer certain interrogatories. … McNutt [v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Van Brown v. Shepherd

    74 Mo. 310 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

    We have been cited to the case of the City of Kansas v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kammeyer v. Board of Education

    393 S.W.2d 122 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1965

    Greene High School, 208 Iowa 1037 , 226 N.W. 71 ; Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside T. P. … The cases of Mann v. Board of Education of Detroit, 266 Mich. 271 , 253 N.W. 294 ; Scrivner v. Franklin School District No. 2 of Canyon County, 50 Idaho 77 , 293 P. 666 ; Wahlig v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Cape

    266 S.W.2d 45 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1954

    Martin v. … Brown, also a witness for relators.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Commisioners v. Peter

    253 Mo. 520 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 24, 1913

    [Brooks v. Schultz, 178 Mo. l. c. 228.] … [Farrar v. St. Louis, 80 Mo. l. c. 387 et seq., and cases cited and reviewed; Kansas City v. Bacon, 147 Mo. l. c. 282.]

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Beall v. Board of Trade

    164 Mo. App. 186 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1912

    [Connor v. Black, 119 Mo. 126 ; Deierling v. Sloop, 67 Mo. App. 446 ; Lane v. Logan Grain Co., 105 Mo. App. 215 .]. … [Cross v. Richardson, 96 N. Y. 641 ; 29 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law, 912.] It is true, as we said in Farmer v. Board of Trade, 78 Mo.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Woods

    332 Mo. 1123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1933

    Reynolds v. Rickenbrode et al., 319 Mo. 468 , 4 S. W. (2d) 436 . That case was ruled on different facts and under a different statute. The judgment should be reversed. It is so ordered. All concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vollmann v. Board of Trustees

    503 S.W.3d 304 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 2016

    ORDER PER CURIAM John Vollmann appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the Board of Trustees of the Police Retirement System of St. Louis on his application for service-connected disability benefits.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. St. Louis Transit Co.

    108 Mo. App. 310 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1904

    Klockenbrink v. Railroad, 172 Mo. 69 , 72 S. W. 900 . … Parman v. Kansas City, 78 S. W. 1046 .; Feary v. O’Neil, 149 Mo. 467 , 50 S. W. 918 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schierding v. Missouri Dental Board

    705 S.W.2d 484 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1986

    Schierding relies chiefly upon Weinberger v. … We find Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Holt v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

    186 Mo. App. 83 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1914

    [See Shamp v. Lambert, 142 Mo. App. 567 , 121 S. W. 770 .] … [See Dutzi v. Geisel, *93 23 Mo. App. 676 .]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment

    672 S.W.2d 147 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1984

    Louis Public Service Co. v. Public Service Commission, Mo., 291 S.W.2d 95 ; Dunbar v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, Mo.App., 387 S.W.2d 164 . … Bartholomew v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 307 S.W.2d 730, 732 (Mo.App.1957).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Glasnapp v. State Banking Board

    545 S.W.2d 382 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1976

    State Banking Board of Missouri, supra; and Blue Ridge Bank v. State Banking Board, 509 S.W.2d 763 (Mo.App.1974). … Century State Bank v. State Banking Board of Missouri, supra; Blue Ridge Bank v. State Banking Board, supra; Central Bank of Clayton v. State Banking Board of Missouri, supra; Suburban Bank of Kansas City v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Gregory v. Kijakazi

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 17, 2021

    See Brace v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2009) (“If an impairment can be controlled by treatment or medication, it cannot be considered disabling.” (citing Brown v. … (quoting Brown, 390 F.3d at 540)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.