Opinion

Armstrong v. Special Administrative Board

  • 525 S.W.3d 215
  • 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 808
  • 2017 WL 3597018
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
Aug 22, 2017
Status
Published
On the bench
Amburg, Dolan, Hoff
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jasmine Armstrong appeals from the trial court’s “Order and Judgment” granting summary judgment in favor of the Special Administrative Board of the Transitional School District of the City of St. Louis and the St. Louis Public Schools District. We affirm.

*216 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.