Case law

Liberty National Bank v. County Excise Board

175 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1935

In the case of Hume v. … A writ of mandamus will not lie v here its issuance would work injustice or introduce confusion and disorder. Webster v. Morris, 129 Okla. 145 , 264 P. 190 ; Board of Ed. of Guthrie v.

Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board v. Herren

341 P.2d 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1959

Herren, hereinafter called claimant, filed his claim for compensation against Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board and its insurance carrier, the State Insurance Fund, and under date of July 24, 1957, claimant was awarded … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., dissents.

Stockton v. Excise Board of Payne County

155 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1932

Board of Education v. Excise Board of Payne County, No. 23153, decided Jan. 26, 1932, 155 Okla. 227, 7 (2d) 473, and School Dist. No. 4, Garfield Co., v. Independent School Dist. … This question has been decided adversely to them in the case of Excise Board of Creek Co. v. State ex rel. Kissick, 105 Okla. 102 , 231 P. 862 .

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Naifeh

388 P.2d 855 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1964

Such action by defendant was in direct violation of 37 O.S.1961 § 536, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board. In the case of Lightle v. … J., HALLEY, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, JACKSON and IRWIN, JJ., concur.

Barnsdall Oil Co. v. State Board

171 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, cause No. 24271, decided Feb. 12, 1935, 170 Okla. 516 , 41 P. (2d) 453 , having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

Lowden v. Seminole County Excise Board

185 Okla. 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1939

Branch v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County, 171 Okla. 585 , 43 P.2d 90 . In connection with the case of Branch v. … Greer County Excise Board v. Lowden et al. 177 Okla. 7 , 57 P.2d 612 . The judgment of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest is sustained. *431 BAYLESS, O. J., WELCH, V. C.

Cleveland Nat. Bank v. Board of Education

72 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1919

This action was brought by the hank for money had and received by the board of education. … Helm v. Mickleson, 66 Okla. 299 , *145 170 Pac. 704 ; Anderson v. Anderson, 65 Okla. 149 , 165 Pac. 150 ; Joiner v. Ardmore L. & Tr. Co., 33 Okla. 266 , 124 Pac. 1073 ; Brooks t. Hinton St.

Null v. Board of Com'rs., Latimer Co.

98 Okla. 16 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1924

Stat. 1921, provides as follows: “Any survey made by the county surveyor, under the order of the board of county commissioners, in laying out any road or highway along any section or subdivision line of a section, if not … Tholl v. Koles, 65 Kan. 802 , 70 Pac. 881 ; Mills v. Glasscock, 26 Okla. 123 , 110 Pac. 377 . 4.

Board of Com'rs v. State Industrial Commission

184 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1938

Brown testified on both hearings. On the first hearing his statement was made of record by agreement. … Barnes Drilling Co. v. West, supra; Texas Co. v. Roberts, 146 Okla. 140 , 294 P. 180 ; Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 ; Fain Drilling Co. v. Deatherage, 179 Okla. 409 , 65 P.2d 1212 .

Roper v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 19, 2024

See Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1162 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). 2 The Court takes judicial notice of the state-court docket. See Mitchell v. Dowling, 672 F. … Kailey v. Ritter, 500 F. App’x 766, 768 (10th Cir. 2012) (concluding Heck barred plaintiff’s § 1983 overdetention claim); Brown v. Cline, 319 F. App’x 704, 705 (10th Cir. 2009) (same).

Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners

183 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1938

The parties to this cause have stipulated that the point at issue here is the same as that decided in Herrin et al. v. … BAXLESS, V. C. J., and PHELPS, J., absent.

Board of Comrs. Grant Co. v. McKinley

8 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

In Van Trees v. Territory, 7 Okla. 353, 54 Pac. 495 , Mr. … (Story, Const. 1768; Edwards v. Elliott, 21 Wall, 532; Light v. Bank, 2 Okla. 543, 37 Pac. 1075 .”)

McMaster Construction, Inc. v. Board of Regents

68 O.B.A.J. 790 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1997

Brown, 422 N.E.2d 1254 (Ind.Ct.App.1981); Attlin Construction, Inc. v. Muncie Community Schools, 413 N.E.2d 281 (Ind.Ct.App.1980); Krohnberg v. Pass, 187 Minn. 73 , 244 N.W. 329 (1932); Malloy v. … Boyertown Area School Board, 540 Pa. 308 , 657 A.2d 915 (1995); Mongiovi v. Doemer, 24 Or.App. 639 , 546 P.2d 1110 (1976); Gulf Bitulithic Co. v. Nueces County, 11 S.W.2d 305 (Tex.Ct.App.1928); City of Houston v.

Pippen v. Board of Com'rs, Okmulgee Co.

87 Okla. 177 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1922

This court, in the case of Arthur v. … Duncan et al. v. Deming Investment Co., 54 Okla. 680 . 154 Pac. 651 .

Carroll, Brough Robinson v. Board of Commissioners

64 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1917

of said board, before the taxes were paid. … In re Appeal of Eranklin Hickman, 63 Okla. 14 , 162 Pac. 176 ; Weatherly v. Cloworth Development Company, 63 Okla. 397 , 166 Pac. 156 ; Weatherly v. Sawyer, 63 Okla. 155 , 163 Pac. 717 .

Sibel v. State Board of Public Affairs

206 Okla. 433 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1952

HALLEY, V. C. J. … Murray v.

Brasier v. State Board of Barber Examiners

193 Okla. 74 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1943

On December 3, 1940, we held this rule to be valid in Schwarze v. Clark, 188 Okla. 217 , 107 P. 2d 1018 . … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. OSBORN, WELCH, and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

Edelmann v. Board of Com'rs, Leflore Co.

110 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1925

Held, the contract is null and void,” —following the cases of the Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Co-Operative Publishing Co., 104 Okla. 262 , 231 Pac. 251 ; Board of County Com’rs of Tulsa County v. … . & Audit Company, 104 Okla. 260 , 231 Pac. 250 ; Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 . 228 Pac. 1103 .

Board Cty. Com'rs Okmulgee Cty. v. Jenness

178 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1936

Jenness, the defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought this action against the -board of county commissioners of Okmulgee county, plaintiff in error, defendant below. … We are of the opinion that the rule expressed in State ex rel. v. Stanfield, 34 Okla. 524 , 126 P. 239 , is the rule to be followed in this case, wherein chapter 80, S. L. 1910-11, is construed.

Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of Miami

40 F.2d 508 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 2, 1930

Spitzer v. City of El Reno, 41 Okl. 430 , 138 P. 797 . … Peake v. City of New Orleans, 139 U. S. 342 , 11 S. Ct. 541 , 35 L. Ed. 131 ; City of New Orleans v. Warner, 175 U. S. 120 , 20 S. Ct. 44 , 44 L. Ed. 96 .