Opinion

Jarvis v. State Board of Barber Examiners

183 Okla. 527
83 P.2d 560
1938 OK 525
1938 Okla. LEXIS 335

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed: Oct 18, 1938
Status: Published
Author: Gibson
On the bench: Gibson, Osborn, Riley, Hurst, Davison, Weloi-I, Corn, Baxless, Phelps
Cited by: 5 cases
Authority: More cited than 71.7%

The opinion

GIBSON, J.

The parties to this cause have stipulated that the point at issue here is the same as that decided in Herrin et al. v. Arnold, Judge, No. 28307 (decided July 26, 1938, 183 Okla. 392 , 82 P.2d 977 ), and they have further stipulated that the decision in that case may control the decision in this case. Accordingly the judgment of the district court is affirmed, and the syllabus in cause No. 28307, Herrin et al. v. Arnold, Judge, is adopted as the syllabus in this cause.

Judgment affirmed.

OSBORN, C. J„ - and RILEY, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. WELOI-I and CORN, JJ., dissent. BAXLESS, V. C. J., and PHELPS, J., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.