Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Birdneck Villas Condominium Ass'n Board of Directors v. Birdneck Villas, L.L.C.
73 Va. Cir. 175 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · Apr 2, 2007
For instance, in *177 Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. … In Baker v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Sturges v. Board of Directors
2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 24 · Illinois Circuit Court · Jan 17, 1878
Rice v. The Board of Trade of Chicago, 80 Ill. 134 , as authority, then it is clear that the petition for a mandamus in this case cannot be sustained and that the answer to it presents a perfect defense. … Board of Trade, filed at Ottawa, January 21, 1878 ( 86 Ill. 441 ), which case counsel had suggested brought into review the decision in Rice v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMiller v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review
60 Pa. D. & C.4th 277 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Feb 8, 2002
See generally, Miller v. Board of Property Assessment Appeals and Review of Allegheny County, 145 P.L.J. 501 (1997). … In Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedR. H. Macy & Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board
192 Misc. 697 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1948
Co. v. Labor Board, 316 U. S. 31 ; Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp., 306 U. S. 240 ). … Labor Board, 321 U. S. 678 ; J. I. Case Co. v. Labor Board, 321 U. S. 332 ; N. L. R. B. v. Elyria Telephone Co., 158 F. 2d 868 ; Pure Oil Company, 73 N. L. R. B. 1; Hudson Hosiery Co., 72 N. L. R. B. 1434.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedWestport Land Co. v. Realty Board Investors, Inc.
28 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 160 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jul 31, 1930
On or about June 3rd, 1930, the case of Brueggemann et al v. The Realty Board Investors, Inc. et al. was filed- in this court. The amended petition in that case contained four causes of action. … All of the capital stock of the Board Investors Company was held by the Realty Board Investors, Inc.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 N.H. 78 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1852
This petition was re-committed to the former board of road commissioners, to whom it was originally committed, instead of the new board who were in office at the time of the re-commitment. … Clapp v. Hanson, 3 Shepl. Rep. 345; Jenkins v. Brown, 21 Wendell’s Rep. 454; Feneley v. Mahoney, 21 Pick. Rep. 212 ; Cummings v. Fullum, 13 Vermont Rep. 459; Commonwealth v. Sackett, 22 Pick. 394 ; Cutter v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedC. W. Mitchell's Administrator v. Board of Commissioners
5 Ohio N.P. 158 · Champaign County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 15, 1898
The remarks of the same judge in Board of Education v. … Vernon, 27 Iowa, 28 ; Board of Education v. State, 51 Ohio St., 539 ; Ervine’s Appeal, 16 Pa. St., p. 257; Ponder v. Graham, 4 Fla., 23 ; Caldwell v. Board of Com’rs., 4 O. N. P. Rep., 249.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of County Commissioners v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance
30 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 163 · Hocking County Court of Common Pleas · Nov 28, 1931
It would appear, therefore, that the rule of interpretation announced by the Supreme Court in State v. Worthington, 7 O., Pt. 1, page 171, and Gardner v. … State v. Findley, 10 O., 51 ; Place v. Taylor, 22 O. S., 317; 4 R. C. L., pages 54 and 55.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education of the City School District v. City Council
59 Misc. 2d 784 · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 1969
The scheme of preserving continuity was carried out to the extent of continuing in office the members of the Board of Education (except where a board member also occupied another city office) until their current terms expired … However, Board of Education of Baltimore County v. Hartmann ( 146 Md. 307 ) presents some interesting parallels.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. McNeil v. New York State Board of Parole
87 Misc. 2d 497 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1976
Menechino v Warden, supra; Correction Law, § 212, subd 10; Matter of Hines v State Board of Parole, 293 NY 254 ). … matter with which the court should not interfere (Matter of Paulsen v Board of Parole, supra).
Reversed on other grounds by People ex rel. McNeil v. New York State Board of Parole, 57 A.D.2d 876 (1977)Cited 4 timesPublishedBurger v. Board of Trustees of Montville Township
58 Ohio Misc. 21 · Medina County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 13, 1978
Plaintiff contends that the resolution subsection in-question is contrary to law in that it does not -concern a “use” within'the regulatory power granted to the Township Board of Trustees pursuant to R. … Crist v. True, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Hudson River Regulating District v. De Long
134 Misc. 775 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1929
The provision- sought to be corrected is not in conformity with the statute (Conservation Law, § 457; Board of Hudson River Regulating Dist. v. Fonda, J. & G. R. R. Co., 249 N. … (Citing Leonard v. Columbia Steam Nav. Co., 84 N. Y. 48 ; Cagger v. Lansing, 64 id. 417; Johnson v. Carnley, 10 id. 570; Ingersoll v. Bostwick, 22 id. 425.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedStatewide Roofing, Inc. v. Eastern Suffolk Board of Cooperative Educational Services
173 Misc. 2d 514 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1997
Corp. v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 66 NY2d 144 , supra; Jered Contr. Corp. v New York City Tr. Auth., 22 NY2d 187 , supra). … Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 [1974]; Matter of Gandolfo v White, 224 AD2d 526 [1996]).
Cited 4 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Hensley v. New York State Board of Parole
83 Misc. 2d 269 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1975
In this habeas corpus proceeding, relator alleges that the Board of Parole waived his alleged violation of parole by failure to execute the parole violation warrant with due diligence and, further, that the board has failed … Grosso v Addition, 185 Misc 670 ; Simon v Moseley, 452 F2d 306; Greene v Michigan Department of Corrections, 315 F2d 546).
Cited 3 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Root v. Board of Sup'rs of Steuben Co.
30 N.Y.S. 729 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1894
If the board of supervisors of any county shall deem any town in the county to be unreasonably burdened by its expenses for the construction and repair of its bridges the board may cause a sum of money not exceeding $2,000 … Stowell, Supervisor, v. Same Defendant, as the material facts and questions involved are the same in both cases. All concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWest Park Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing Board
59 Pa. D. & C.4th 44 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Jun 27, 2002
Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550, 555 , 462 A.2d 637, 640 (1983). … Shohola Falls Trails End Property Owners Association Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Shohola Township, 679 A.2d 1335 (Pa. Commw. 1996), alloc. denied, 548 Pa. 651 , 695 A.2d 788 (1997); Hersh v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGargiolo v. City of Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment
32 Pa. D. & C.5th 44 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 8, 2013
Pennsylvania Game Commission v. Dept. of Environmental Resources, 555A.2d812(Pa. 1989); Robinson Tp. v. … or other board or commission created to regulate development within the city.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Feb 20, 2009
v. … Southwest Harbor, 2001 ME 2, 110, 763 A.2d 161, 164; Stewart v. Town of Sedgwick, 2000 ME 157, 14, 757 A.2d 773,776; and Gensheimer v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished30 Barb. 501 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1859
By the Court, Brown, J. … Lott, Emott and Brown, Justices.]
Cited 0 timesPublishedPlate v. Kincannon Place Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n Board of Directors
30 Va. Cir. 323 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 5, 1993
Blackwelder Furniture Co. v. Seilig Mfg. Co., 550 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1977); Zaki v. Oberoi, 18 Va. Cir. 209, 210 (Fairfax County 1989); Heublein, Inc. v. Dept. of A.B.C., 12 Va. … Partnership v. CFS Mgt. Co., 133 Bankr. 74, 75 (E.D. Va. 1991); Baker v. Loudoun County School Board, 17 Va. Cir. 217, 218 (1989).
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna