Case law

Mitchell Mountain, L.L.C. v. Madison County Board of Supervisors

70 Va. Cir. 294 · Madison County Circuit Court · Mar 17, 2006

Moreover, while both attorneys make reference to the case of Parker v. County of Madison, 244 Va. 39 , 418 S.E.2d 855 (1992), and the case of Shilling v. … Hudson v. Jarrett, 269 Va. 24 , 606 S.E.2d 827 (2005). Here, Ms. Johnson has an interest in the outcome of the case and she is understandably concerned about the impact that the litigation might have on her property.

Millersville University v. Millersville Borough Zoning Hearing Board

82 Pa. D. & C.4th 297 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Aug 18, 2006

(citing Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550, 555 , 462 A.2d 637, 640 (1983)). … Macioce v. Zoning Hearing Board, 850 A.2d 882 , 887 n.9 (Pa. Commw. 2004). 1.

Lamar Advertising Co. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

54 Va. Cir. 209 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Dec 6, 2000

See Masterson v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 233 Va. 37, 44 , 353 S.E.2d 727, 732 (1987). Petitioners’ first argument is that the Zoning Administrator incorrectly measured the height of the billboard. … Certiorari is overruled and the Board of Zoning Appeals decision is affirmed.

People ex rel. Peck v. Canal Board

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 159 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1883

(People v. Dennison., 84 N. Y., 272, 281 .) It has provided that the class of claims, of which relator’s is one, may be presented to and passed upon by the board of canal appraisers. … Seymour v. Canal Board, 7 Lans., 220 ; People ex rel. Benedict v. Dennison, 28 Hun, 328 .)

Appraisal & Realty Service, Inc. v. West Virginia Board of Regents

9 Ct. Cl. 26 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Sep 13, 1971

DUCKER, JUDGE: The Claimant, Appraisal and Realty Service, Inc., was employed by the West Virginia Board of Education to appraise sixteen lots in Blocks 9 and 11 of Institute City, Kanawha County, West Virginia, in connection … Brown Tract, in Institute, for the same purpose for a fee of $750.00.

Adams Express Co. v. Board of Police

65 How. Pr. 72 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1883

The Board of Police.

Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 247 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Feb 19, 1980

This Court in the case of the City of Carbondale v.

Tracey Tower Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

132 Misc. 2d 174 · New York Supreme Court · May 30, 1986

There must be a duty imposed by law (Matter of Lisa v Board of Elections, 83 AD2d 949 [2d Dept 1981]; Matter of Morgenthau v Gold, 126 Misc 2d 856 [Sup Ct, NY County 1985]) and the action requested must be of a ministerial … The internal allocation of agency resources is necessarily discretionary and consequently mandamus to compel is unavailable (Matter of Brown v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., supra; Matter of City of New York v New

State ex rel. Schwartz v. O. & M. R. R.

6 Ohio C.C. 415 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

Brown, Shipley & Co. … But if this be not so, and the contract by its terms is not revocable, and is on this account illegal, we would hold on the authority of Griffith v.

X-tra Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

1 Pa. D. & C.5th 110 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 25, 2006

Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Cantina Gloria’s Lounge Inc., 536 Pa. 254 , 639 A.2d 14 (1994). … Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Kelly’s Bar Inc., 536 Pa. 310 , 639 A.2d 440 (1994).

Hornstein v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.

22 Misc. 2d 996 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1942

Browne was president of that union and William Bioff was on its payroll at a substantial salary and was variously designated as “Personal representative” of Browne, international representative and organizer. … Particular inquiry as to whether that single director and executive officer thereby exceeded the powers conferred upon him by the board is here unnecessary, however for when the board was advised of the matter it elected

In re the Arbitration between Brown-Turner, Inc. & Complete Machinery & Equipment Co.

4 Misc. 2d 786 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1955

performance under the contract shall continue”, Brown-Turner itself has breached the contract, and is therefore not entitled to demand arbitration. … In response, Brown-Turner, while admitting nonpayment as such, claims that poor and delayed work on Complete Machinery’s part in violation of the terms of the contract has given rise to a counterclaim in Brown-Turner’s favor

Spotsylvania County School Board v. R. E. Lee & Son, Inc.

5 Va. Cir. 48 · Spotsylvania County Circuit Court · Apr 8, 1982

There is no question in my mind that the Board has the inherent power to settle and adjust disputed claims, and must frequently do so during the course of construction contracts of this sort. … Such Boards are separate corporate entities. I feel that for several of the reasons discussed at length in the briefs of the Defendant that the arbitration provision of the contract is valid.

Reston Inn & Conference Center Venture v. Board of Zoning Appeals

23 Va. Cir. 33 · Virginia Circuit Court · Nov 26, 1990

Section 15.1-497 provides that such a petition must be filed within thirty days "after the filing of the decision in the office of the board." … Also, I believe the proposed writ is overbroad in the documentation it requires the board to produce.

Brookside Ltd. Partnership v. Big Beaver Falls Area School Board

27 Pa. D. & C.3d 73 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County · Jan 14, 1982

S. § 6-677.1, it did not need to appeal first to the local board of assessment appeals. … the order of the board to the court of common pleas of the county . . .

Trustees of the Presbytery v. Board of Revision of Taxes

5 Pa. D. & C.2d 226 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 17, 1955

The appellee board on January 25, 1955, granted exemption of $10,900 of the assessment for taxes for 1955 but made $3,000 taxable because a portion of the dwelling is used for residential purposes. … The appeal is hereby sustained and the board of revision of taxes is hereby ordered to grant exemption from taxation to premises no. 705 Pine Street, Philadelphia, for the taxable year 1955, and hereafter, so long as said

Broad Run Village, L.C. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

59 Va. Cir. 96 · Virginia Circuit Court · May 8, 2002

The argument of Broad Run suggests that the Board has imposed illegal restrictions upon access to public water and sewer utilities to be extended into the Transition Policy Area. … Riverview Farm Associates Virginia, General Partnership v. Board of Supervisors of Charles City County, 259 Va. 419 (2000); City of Fairfax v. Shanklin, 205 Va. 227 (1964).

Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

15 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236 · Licking Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1912

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

184 Misc. 512 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1944

It is not disputed that Conservation Order L. 41 issued by the War Production Board on April 9, 1942 ( 7 Fed. … , the date of the withdrawal of the respondents ’ appeal, as well as on August 4, 1942, the date of the approval of the petitioner’s application and plans for the erection of its theatre, the order of the War Production Board

People ex rel. McCombs v. Board Auditors of Deer Park

20 N.Y.S. 268 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892