Opinion

Reston Inn & Conference Center Venture v. Board of Zoning Appeals

  • 23 Va. Cir. 33
  • 1990 Va. Cir. LEXIS 422
Court
Virginia Circuit Court
Filed
Nov 26, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Kenny
On the bench
Kenny
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

By JUDGE THOMAS S. KENNY

I have not entered the writ of certiorari in this case because it appears that it may not be timely. The petition was filed November 16, but the action complained of was taken on October 9, 1990. Section 15.1-497 provides that such a petition must be filed within thirty days "after the filing of the decision in the office of the board."

If the "filing of the decision" was subsequent to the October 9 decision, [the] petition [should be revised] to reflect that fact.

Also, I believe the proposed writ is overbroad in the documentation it requires the board to produce. The purpose of the writ is to procure before this court the record on which the Board based its decision; it is not a substitute for discovery. I would not include items 7 through 11 mentioned in [the] proposed writ, nor would I include staff memoranda, drafts or supplements from item 6.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.