Case law

Williams v. Westchester County Board of Elections

25 Misc. 3d 787 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 2009

(Matter of Powers v Coughlin, 268 NY 623 [1935]; Matter of Finnegan v Cohen, 177 Misc 142 [1941]; Matter of Elgin v Smith, 10 AD3d 483 [4th Dept 2004].) … The instant petition was submitted and returnable simultaneously with a companion petition, Matter of Detres, Plummer, Justino, Sampson, Stern and Edwers v Westchester County Board of Elections and Apuzzo, Watts, Munro, Edwards

Temporary State Charter Revision Commission v. Board of Elections

83 Misc. 2d 1029 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1975

as to ensure that corresponding parts of the existing charter remain in effect if one or more of such parts are not adopted; (ii) a revised charter in one or more parts; (iii) alternative charters, (iv) amendments and (v) … The case of Matter of McCabe v Voorhis ( 243 NY 401 ) relied on by respondent is inapposite.

Mahrt v. First Church of Christ

75 Ohio Law. Abs. 5 · Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · May 19, 1955

Kiley v. Hall, 96 Oh St 374; Snow v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co., 46 Abs 317 ; Hayslett v. Shell Petroleum Corp., 38 Oh Ap 164; Grant v. Hickok Oil Co., 40 O. O. 9; 84 Oh Ap 509; Blum v. Hodapp, 55 Abs 203 ; Sopartkovich v. … O. 167; Edwards v. Ohio State Students Trailer Park Coop. Inc., 84 Oh Ap 518; 40 O. O. 13; Smith v. Volk, 85 Oh Ap 347; 40 O. O. 213; Baptist Ass’n v. Scovil, 107 Oh St 67.

Teleprompter Manhattan City Corp. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

60 Misc. 2d 518 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1969

City of New York v. Chapman, 193 Misc. 27 .) The Tax Law gives to municipalities the right to complain but denies to them the right to review. … Co. v. Priest ( 95 App. Div. 44 ; 101 App. Div. 223 , revd. 181 N. Y. 300 ).

People ex rel. Mutual Life Insurance v. Board of Supervisors

20 Barb. 81 · New York Supreme Court · May 7, 1855

But the tax commissioners, on reviewing the assessment roll, added $900,000, making the amount one million instead of one hundred thousand; and the board of supervisors subsequently, on the application of the company, refused

People ex rel. McGowan v. Board of Estimate

3 Thomp. & Cook 151 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1874

If that had been the purpose of the demands, they would simply have required the respondents to include the unallowed salaries in the estimates which should be made by the board for the year 1874. … Clark v. Norton, 49 N. Y. 243 .

Silkman v. Board of Water Commissioners of Yonkers

24 N.Y.S. 806 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1893

Provident Inst, for Saving v. Jersey City, 113 U. S. 506 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 612; Treadwell v. Van Schaick, 30 Barb. 444 .

People ex rel. Muckle v. Board of Excise

35 N.Y.S. 659 · New York County Courts · Jul 15, 1895

People v. Board of Com’rs of Excise, 4 Misc. Rep. 336 , 25 N. Y. Supp. 322 ; Martin v. Symonds, 4 Misc. Rep. 8 , 23 N. Y. Supp. 689 . … McNaughton v. Board, 5 Misc. Rep. 457 , 26 N. Y. Supp. 229 .

St. Matthew Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ, Inc. v. Creech

196 Misc. 2d 843 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2003

Washington and sister-in-law Ethel Brown. Consequently, Bishop Creech did not accept Phair’s authority as the pastor of St. Matthew. In response, Bishop Creech called a meeting of NEDA’s Board of Elders at St. … NEDA’s Constitution, article V, § 7, however, relegates the authority of the “Council/Elders Board” to religious matters “pertaining to the hearings and disciplinary [sic] of ministers” (see also NEDA bylaws § 13).

Mastroianni v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Glen Cove

36 Misc. 2d 343 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1962

It does not appear that the Planning Board in approving the subdivision map prior to 1952 modified or was authorized to modify the then existing zoning regulations (see Matter of Johnson v. Moore, 13 A D 2d 984). … In Matter of Ferryman v. Weisser (3 A D 2d 674) the record showed a similar situation but the determination of the Board of Appeals denying the variance Avas approved.

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Marlene Transportation Co.

207 Misc. 677 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1955

Matter of Holland v. Edwards, 307 N. Y. 38, 45 ). The finding of unfair labor practices made by the State board is amply supported by substantial evidence and is conclusive upon this court (Matter of Stork Restaurant v. … Y. 256 , 267 ; Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board, 324 U. S. 793 ).

People v. Kern

56 Misc. 2d 557 · New York County Courts · Mar 29, 1968

Cox v. Louisiana ( 379 U. S. 536 ); Henry v. City of Rock Hill ( 376 U. S. 776 ); Edwards v. South Carolina ( 372 U. S. 229 ) and Garner v. Louisiana ( 368 U. … The People rely on People v. Martin (43 Mise 2d 355, affd. 15 N Y 2d 933). There, the defendants attended a meeting of the Board of Education of the Málveme School District.

People ex rel. Rumph v. Board of Sup'rs

34 N.Y.S. 1128 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1895

BROWN, P. J. The material facts set forth in the petition in this proceeding are as follows: In the spring of 1894, William V. B. … People v. Board of Apportionment, 64 N. Y. 627 ; People v. Brush, supra. We must assume, therefore, in this case, notwithstanding the allegations of the petition, that Mr.

People ex rel. McSpedon v. Board of Supervisors

21 How. Pr. 288 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1861

People ex rel. Keene v. Board of Sup'rs

36 N.Y.S. 1131 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895

It was said by the court of appeals in this case that the duty imposed by the statute upon the boards of supervisors of the two counties is plainly demonstrative and mandatory, and not discretionary. … People v. Board of Sup’rs of Queens Co., 142 N. Y. 277 , 36 N. E. 1062 ; People v. Board of Sup’rs of Otsego Co., 51 N. Y. 401 .

People ex rel. Foley v. Board of Education

32 N.Y.S. 377 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

People v. Robb, 126 N. Y. 180 , 27 N. E. 267 ; People v. Lathrop, 142 N. Y. 113 , 36 N. E. 805 . The sufficiency of the reasons for the exercise of the power of removal must be determined primarily by the board. … In the case of People v. Lathrop it was said that the court had nothing to do with the reason or justice of the removal.

J.R.D. Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

117 Misc. 2d 459 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1983

Corp. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. Y. … Tenants Assn. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., NYLJ, Oct. 30, 1978, p 7, col 5.)

People ex rel. Keene v. Board of Supervisors

24 N.Y.S. 563 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1893

Hill v. Supervisors, 12 N. Y. 52 . … Under this last provision of the constitution, the legislature may invest the boards of supervisors in this state with power to lay out and open highways. People v. Board of Sup’rs of Queens County, 112 N.

People ex rel. McGrath v. Board of Supervisors

6 N.Y.S. 153 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1889

committed; (2) where the proceedings are for felonies; and (3) ‘ where the proceedings or trial for the offense shall be had before any court of oyer and terminer, or general sessions of the peace.’ ” The case of People v. … The case of People v. Supervisors, 67 N. Y. 330 , bears no analogy, and has no application to this case. That was the case of a sheriff’s bill for receiving, boarding, and discharging prisoners.

People ex rel. White v. Board of Sup'rs

19 N.Y.S. 642 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1892

The return made by the board of supervisors must be taken -by us ás a true statement of'the facts of the case. People v. Board of Fire Com'rs, 73 N.Y. 437 ; People v. French, 25 Hun, 112 . … McMaster v. State, 108 N. Y. 557, 558 , 15 N. E. Rep. 417. It was not error for the supervisors to reject the charges in relator’s account for arraignments.