Opinion

Silkman v. Board of Water Commissioners of Yonkers

  • 24 N.Y.S. 806
  • 78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 37
  • 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 81
  • 71 Hun 37
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 28, 1893
Status
Published
Author
Barnard
On the bench
Barnard
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.0%

The opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

The water rates are not taxes. The act under which the defendant was incorporated (chapter 36, Laws 1873) directs the commissioners to establish a scale of rents payable in advance or upon a stated term of credit, to be called “water rents.” The hoard was authorized to cut off the supply of water if these rents were not paid. There is no basis for terming these water rents a “tax.” Provident Inst, for Saving v. Jersey City, 113 U. S. 506 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 612; Treadwell v. Van Schaick, 30 Barb. 444 . The commissioners did fix the rates, and it was supplied and paid for, but under a protest on account of his receiving no notice of the levying of a tax on the land. There is no lien on the land for water furnished and not paid for. There will be a tax on land for a deficiency to meet the purpose of the act, and, when this tax is laid, it will be upon notice. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.