Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.40s
Hamm v. Philadelphia Board of Education
9 Pa. D. & C.3d 388 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 31, 1979
Gault v. Garrison, 569 F. 2d 993 (7th Cir. 1977), and Palmer v. … See e.g., Keyes v. School District, No. 1, Denver, Colo., 413 U.S. 189, 207-08 (1973). See also Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo, 425 F. Supp. 987 (E.D. Pa. 1976), and Zichy v. City of Phila., 392 F. Supp. 338 (E.D.
Cited 0 timesPublished2025 NY Slip Op 31501(U) · New York Supreme Court, Saratoga County · Apr 29, 2025
Matter of Brown v Mahan 2025 NY Slip Op 31501(U) April 29, 2025 Supreme Court, Saratoga County Docket Number: Index No. … As an aggrieved candidate, Petitioner Brown "was not required to file objections and specifications to the petition prior to commencin g [the invalidation] proceeding." Matter of Magee v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedGaudenzia, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board
30 Pa. D. & C.3d 42 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Apr 13, 1983
Whether the present zoning hearing board would agree with that interpretation is not relevant to our inquiry. It was made and became a vested right which inures to the benefit of subsequent owners of the land. Swartz v. … The Harrisburg Zoning Hearing Board itself confirmed as much in its findings on Gaudenzia’s application for a special exception.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTax Review Board v. Reynolds & Co.
68 Pa. D. & C.2d 233 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Sep 19, 1974
The second issue is whether the decision in Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. … Justice Roberts stated in Philadelphia Tax Review Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMager v. Bedminster Township Zoning Board
39 Pa. D. & C.2d 368 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Feb 14, 1966
Pursuant to the remand order, the zoning board of adjustment held a further hearing, at which it was stipulated by counsel that appellant’s property constitutes a “farm”, and not a subdivision; whereupon, the zoning board … See also Cleaver v. Board of Adjustment, 414 Pa. 367 (1964), and the cases there cited at page 374.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLower Allen Township v. Zoning Board
23 Pa. D. & C.3d 694 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Aug 10, 1981
v. … The case of Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 396 Pa. 82 , 151 A. 2d 474 (1959) can be distinguished for the same reasons.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
123 Misc. 2d 47 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1984
Co., 57 NY 161 ; People v Lowe, 117 NY 175 ; People v O'Brien, 111 NY 1 ; People v Singer, 193 Misc 976 ). … Accordingly the petition of the Attorney-General is denied and the respondent New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board shall have judgment dismissing the proceeding. .
Cited 1 timesPublishedLombardo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
56 Pa. D. & C.2d 307 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 26, 1970
It is not necessary or useful at this time to indicate the scope of this evidence, since our decision is not based on abuse of discretion on the part of the board in making its determination of facts (Polizzi v. … Furthermore, in Jacobi v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGoldsand v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
28 Pa. D. & C.2d 223 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 17, 1962
allowable where facts and conditions detailed in the ordinance as those upon which an exception is permitted exist: Appeal of Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, 379 Pa. 516 , 109 A. 2d 537 ; Lukens v. … In Gibson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 13 D. & C. 2d 203, 44 Del.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTenox Corp. v. Tax Review Board
24 Pa. D. & C.2d 426 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 20, 1961
Brown, Jr., P. J., This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board of the City of Philadelphia. … Reliance is placed by appellant on Girard Trust Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBlythe Township v. Board of Elections
14 Pa. D. & C.4th 432 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County · Oct 24, 1991
DISCUSSION In Hempfield School District v. Election Board of Lancaster County, 133 Pa. … Therefore, the Election Board of Lancaster County was enjoined from including the non-binding referendum on the election ballot.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcGlinchey v. State Tax Equalization Board
23 Pa. D. & C.2d 594 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Aug 22, 1960
See also Falgiatore v. Falgiatore, 378 Pa. 586 (1954), and Fountain v. Bigham, 235 Pa. 35 (1912). … In the case of McSorley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPenz v. Stowe Township School Board
39 Pa. D. & C.2d 562 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Dec 31, 1965
See Jermyn v. City of Scranton, 186 Pa. 595 . In Commonwealth ex rel. v. … Franek v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSeitchik v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
13 Pa. D. & C.2d 43 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 10, 1957
This language alone appears to support appellant’s position; but Darling v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Philadelphia, 357 Pa. 428 , is to the contrary. … The board erred as a matter of law in failing to find unnecessary hardship. Pincus v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 376 Pa. 175 , relied upon by the board is inapposite.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrookhaven Borough v. Brookhaven Zoning Hearing Board
17 Pa. D. & C.3d 312 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Apr 16, 1980
In DePaul Realty Company v. Borough of *315 Quakertown, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 16, 22 , 324 A. 2d 832, 835 (1974), the court noted: “. . . … McGovern, Jr. in Borough of Brookhaven v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Brookhaven and Luz, 67 Del.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarrie v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
5 Pa. D. & C.4th 174 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Mar 13, 1990
Section 4-493(1) provides in pertinent part that it shall be unlawful: “For any licensee or the board, or any employee, servant or agent of such licensee or of the board, or any other person, to sell, furnish or give any … See e.g., Fischer v. Anderson, 173 Pa. Super. 175 , 96 A.2d 168 (1953); Commonwealth v. Johnson, 457 Pa. 554 , 327 A.2d 632 (1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNester v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
42 Pa. D. & C. 53 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Feb 19, 1941
(Powers v. Board of Public Works, supra; Rodgers v. Board of Public Works, supra.) … (Matter of Lazenby v. Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of Elmira, 116 App. Div. 135 ; affd., 188 N. Y. 588 .) ” In the case of Kassarich v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 139 Pa.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLloyd v. Lackawanna County Retirement Board
6 Pa. D. & C.2d 705 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Jan 11, 1956
Where the language and meaning are clear the intention of the legislature is to be found only in the unambiguous language of the statute: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. … See Baker v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 374 Pa. 165 . And, too, it must be noted that no contributions have been made to the fund on this score.
Cited 0 timesPublishedShore v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
3 Pa. D. & C.2d 14 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 19, 1955
The zoning board of adjustment should have recognized the right of petitioner to expand the nonconforming use of her building. … The order of the zoning board is accordingly reversed. No variance under the Housing and Sanitation Act is required for the reasons aforementioned.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNewby v. Newtown Township Board of Supervisors
53 Pa. D. & C.2d 627 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Mar 30, 1971
deFURIA, J., This action is an appeal by plaintiff, lodged on October 14, 1970, from the order of the Board of Supervisors of the Township of Newtown, Pa., affirming plaintiff’s honorable discharge as a township police officer … Appeal under the Act of 1951 is provided in section 5 thereof: “The suspended or dismissed employe shall have the right to appeal to the court of common pleas of the county in which he was employed.”: McCandless Twp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna