Case law

State ex rel. Schnee v. Board of Education

3 Ohio N.P. 236 · Summit County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 30, 1896

Robertson v. The Board of Education of Perry township, reported in the 27th Ohio St. 96 is clearly in point in this case, and ro the same effect is the case of Case v. Geo. … Wresler, Treasurer of Scott township, Brown county, 4th Ohio St. 561.

State ex rel. Kuehnert v. Board of Education

2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 438 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1889

(dissenting): I think the action of the board of education upon the allowance of the peremptory writ issued against them was a substantial compliance with the order of the court, and that they should be dismissed. … But from the return of the board and the evidence taken thereunder, I am convinced that it was their intention to so allow him, and that it was a fair compensation, and so understood by the parties and that the subsequent

State ex rel. Gibson v. Board of Education

2 Ohio C.C. 557 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1887

The legislature, as to the conduct and management of such schools, and the powers of the board of education, is su *564 preme. … Smith, for board of education. We are of the opinion, then, that the relator is entitled to a peremptory writ as prayed for.

State ex rel. Gibson v. Board of Education

1 Ohio Cir. Dec. 640 · Butler Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1887

Smith, for board of education. … It is hardly possible in a matter involving so much feeling and so many prejudices, that this interpretation would have been so generally put upon the action of the legislature, if it v/as not the one which appeared plain

State ex rel. Ferry v. Board of Education

21 Ohio C.C. 785 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

That on the 9th of September, 1889, the board, by resolution of that date, assumed to reduce the compensation of the relator and the other members of the board of examiners to $120 per annum, and from the 1st of September … The claim of counsel for the relator is that the board of education, having, in pursuance of the requirement of the statute, fixed the compensation or salary of the members of the board of examiners,that it had no right during

State ex rel. Ferry v. Board of Education

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 333 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

That on September 9, 1889, the board, by resolution of that date, assumed to reduce the compensation of the relator and the other members of the board of examiners to $120 per annum, and from September 1, *334 1889, till … The claim of counsel for the relator is that the board of education, having, in pursuance of the requirement ol the statute, fixed the compensation or salary of the members of the board of examiners, that it had no right

American Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education

55 Misc. 2d 1059 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1967

The plaintiff, American Federation of Teachers at Buffalo (AFT), seeks a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendant Board of Education of the City of Buffalo (hereinafter referred to as the “ Board ”, from recognizing … The plaintiff has not shown to the Board or to the court that it now represents a majority of the employees of the Board.

Cravener v. New York State Board of Parole

48 Misc. 2d 1004 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1966

Rainone v. … However, it begins to run again when he is apprehended and returned to the custody of the Parole Board.

People ex rel. Krieger v. Board of Excise

18 N.Y.S. 959 · New York City Court · Feb 23, 1892

The relator applied to the board of excise for a saloon license. … Upon mandamus proceedings had before the special term of this court,, under Laws 1886, c. 496, the trial judge decided on the proofs that the application was made to the board in due form, and that the board arbitrarily,

People ex rel. Weeks v. Board of Supervisors

25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1879

Among other powers granted such boards of supervisors was the power to authorize towns to borrow money to build and repair roads and bridges. … We think that action by the boards of trustees was not required by this amendment. The words are, “majority óf the trustees” of the village.

People ex rel. Fitzpatrick v. Board of Supervisors

67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1891

People ex rel. Sisco v. Board of Commissioners

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 603 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

Butler in the careful and judicious opinion furnished by him to the board prior to the commencement of the present proceedings. Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Barrett, JJ", Judgment affirmed, with costs.

People ex rel. Kingsford v. Board of Supervisors

47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 635 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1886

People ex rel. Nichols v. Board of Supervisors

69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 619 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1891

People ex rel. Curtin v. Board of Education

69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1891

People ex rel. Sutliff v. Board of Supervisors

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 375 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

.: The relator presented to the Board of Supervisors of Fulton two verified claims for audit and allowance. … After investigation the board rejected the greater portion of such claims; the relator subsequently commenced proceedings to review the action of the defendant, the board of supervisors, and a writ of certiorari was granted

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Supervisors

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1892

People ex rel. Graham v. Board of Supervisors

4 N.Y.S. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1888

People ex rel. Smith v. Board of Assessors

56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1888

People ex rel. McMackin v. Board of Police

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 296 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1887

This was considered in Springfield v. … In King v.