Opinion

People ex rel. Krieger v. Board of Excise

  • 18 N.Y.S. 959
  • 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 937
Court
New York City Court
Filed
Feb 23, 1892
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator applied to the board of excise for a saloon license. Upon mandamus proceedings had before the special term of this court,, under Laws 1886, c. 496, the trial judge decided on the proofs that the application was made to the board in due form, and that the board arbitrarily, and without good cause, reason, or excuse, refused and still refuses to grant such license. After careful examination of the case, we see no reason to disturb* these findings of facts. Order must be affirmed, with costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.