Case law

Tiggerman v. State

132 Misc. 45 · New York Court of Claims · May 1, 1928

charged during the day, and at this time the fair and the grounds were under the control of the State Fair Commission which was appointed by the Governor, and said State Fair Commission was the agent of the State (.Arnold v. … which this action was brought, but before this enabling act was passed, a claim had been filed by the claimant setting forth the facts thereof, and under the decision of the Court of Appeals in Williamsburgh Savings Bank v.

Sanders, Billie v. Robinson Manufacturing Co., Inc.

2018 TN WC 59 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 1, 2018

Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 647 (Tenn. 2008). A party is not required to establish a claim or defense by a preponderance of the evidence at an Expedited Hearing. McCord v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Thompson v. Fedex ground/rps

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 27, 2011

Holley v. ACTS, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 , 581 S.E.2d. 750 (2003). … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers , 300 N.C. 164 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980)); Holly v. ACTS, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 , 581 S.E.2d 750 (2003). 4.

Raul v. Burke

2016 NCBC 8 · North Carolina Business Court · Jan 28, 2016

Raul v. Burke, 2016 NCBC 8. … Fund v. Sanchez, 124 A.3d 1017, 1022 (Del. 2015)). Thus, “[e]valuating a board’s ability to consider a demand impartially . . . requires a ‘contextual inquiry.’” Id. (quoting Beam v.

Borough of Alpine v. Alpine Hills, Inc.

1 N.J. Tax 136 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 25, 1980

The following schedule shows the original land assessments, County Board judgment and claimed true values of the parties for the taxable year 1978: *138 County Board Defendant Assessment Judgment Plaintiff (Taxpayer) Block … See New Brunswick v. State of N. J.

Claim of the First Methodist Episcopal Church v. Estate of Howard

133 Misc. 723 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 21, 1929

The completed plans were accepted by the board of trustees of the church and on December 28, 1922, $1,000 was paid from the collected pledges to the architect on account of his services. … Y. 18 ; Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 id. 517; Keuka College v. Ray, 167 id. 96; Cohen & Sons v. Lurie Woolen Co., 232 id. 112, 114; Locke v. Taylor, 161 App. Div. 44 ; Russian Symphony Society, Inc., v.

Rosemary Aneglo v. Southerness Maintenance Corp

Delaware Court of Common Pleas · Jan 13, 2021

He was Board President for a year and a half. 3 to Southerness to collect those that have been unpaid.” … ° In Linden Green Condominium Ass’n v.

Skinner, John Matthew v. Marion Environmental, Inc.

2017 TN WC 193 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 16, 2017

Christopher v. Consol. Coal Co., 440 S.W.2d 281, 286 (Tenn. 1969). … Adams v. Am. Zinc Co., 326 S.W.2d 425, 427 (Tenn. 1959). In Pool, the Appeals Board considered the notice requirement in a similar mold exposure case resulting in illness.

Schwartz v. State

162 Misc. 2d 313 · New York Court of Claims · Aug 26, 1994

He stated that in 1985 he was Director of the agency’s Medical Review Bureau, the staff serving the agency’s Medical Review Board (MRB). … Persons responsible for an unauthorized autopsy being performed may also be liable for money damages in a civil action brought by the decedent’s next of kin (Brown v Broome County, 8 NY2d 330 ; Torres v State of New York,

Opinion No. 71-138 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 1971

Supreme Court, Kramer v. … Finally, in City of Phoenix v. Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 , 90 S.

Dobson v. the Salvation Army

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 28, 2008

The value of the room and board did not comprise a portion of plaintiff's wages, nor was room and board provided in lieu of wages or compensation. 30. … Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc. , 143 N.C. App. 259 , 545 S.E.2d 485 (2001); Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution , supra .

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 30, 1986

See also, Baskin v. State ex rel. Short , 232 P.388 (Okla. 1925); Mackey v. Crump , 153 P.1128 (Okla. 1915). Without question a bank receives a profit from loaning out money and collecting interest. … The Wisconsin Supreme Court defined this term in Lewandowski v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co ., 146 N.W.2d 505 (Wis. 1966).

Roxborough Apartment Corp. v. Becker

176 Misc. 2d 503 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 17, 1998

v Mills, NYLJ, July 9, 1979, at 5, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept]; Connecticut Investors Corp. v Strasser, 14 Misc 2d 1061 [App Term, 1st Dept 1958]; Guy v Furman, 4 Misc 2d 564 [App Term, 1st Dept 1956].) … As Judge Wendt explained in Associated Realties v Brown ( 146 Misc 2d 1069, 1070-1071 [Civ Ct, NY County 1990]), the predicate notice is vitiated under these circumstances because: “[t]he acceptance of rent for a period after

Klos Constr., Inc. v. Premier Homes & Props., LLC

2020 NCBC 53 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 21, 2020

Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co., 326 N.C. 387, 393, 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990) (citation and quotation marks omitted). … Brown v. Roth, 133 N.C. App. 52, 54, 514 S.E.2d 294, 296 (1999) (citation and quotation marks omitted); Carver v.

Wilson, Louis v. O. G. Kelley and Co.

2018 TN WC 202 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 12, 2018

Hosford v. Red Rover Preschool, 2014 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at * 15 (Oct. 2, 2014 ). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Dautel Builders v. Borough of Franklin

11 N.J. Tax 353 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 18, 1990

Callaghan 1975), § 1034 at 361; Campbell v. Heller, 36 N.J.Super. 361 , 115 A.2d 644 (Ch.Div.1955). … Finally, the deed of June 5, 1986 was not recorded until December 15, 1987, a few weeks after the Franklin Zoning Board of Adjustment approved the subdivision.

Smith, Timeka v. Chattanooga Area Regional Transit Authority

2016 TN WC 4 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 5, 2016

Additionally, the Court cited the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's decision in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, *7 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. … V. of Dr. Jayant Eldurkar; 7. Ms. Ware's December 3, 2015 email to Mr. Batson; and 8. Dr. Terry Smith's July 8, 2015 letter. 7. December 7, 2015 email from Ms.

Lachica v. State

139 Misc. 2d 772 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 31, 1988

(See, e.g., Matter of Sofair v State Univ., 44 NY2d 475 ; Matter of Olsson v Board of Higher Educ., 49 NY2d 408 ; Matter of McIntosh v Borough of Manhattan Community Coll., 78 AD2d 839 , affd 55 NY2d 913 ; Shields v School … Indeed, the court is of the opinion that claimant should have first sought review in the context of an article 78 proceeding (see, e.g., Austin v Board of Higher Educ., 5 NY2d 430 ; cf., Matter of Hunter v Murray, 130 AD2d

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 17, 1996

Oklahoma Journal Publishing Company v. City of Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okla.Ct.App. 1979). It is presumed the Legislature, in the statute, said what it meant and meant what it said. Darnell v. … , state commission or by any employee of either of such officers, boards, or commissions by virtue or under color of office. 2 70 O.S. 1991 , § 3902[ 70-3902 ] provides: As provided in Sections 7.1 through 7.5 and Section

Cincinnati, Lebanon & Northern Railway Co. v. City of Cincinnati

6 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 325 · Hamilton County Court of Insolvency · Jan 15, 1908

Fourteen years later the board of city affairs unanimously passed the following resolution : “Be it Resolved, That this board hereby declares that all the lots 'remaining unsold in the Eden Park subdivision lying west of … In Railway Co. v. Elyria, 69 O.