Case law

In re the Estate of Dickman

142 Misc. 207 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 16, 1931

Y. 158 ; Matter of Akin, 248 id. 202 ; Matter of Raymond v. Davis, Id. 67; Matter of Cook, 244 id. 63; Matter of Winter, 231 App. Div. 519 ; Matter of Ashner, Id. 127; Heavner v. Clarke, 229 id. 786; McLean v. … Div. 831 ; Matter of Seaman, 205 id. 681; Matter of Van Buren v.

Love, Sarah v. Delta Faucet, Co.

2016 TN WC App. 45 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 19, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Sarah Love ) Docket No. 2015-07-0195 ) v. … Tryon v. Saturn Corp., 254 S.W.3d 321, 327 (Tenn. 2008).

Borough of Paramus v. Etaner Enterprises

14 N.J. Tax 208 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 26, 1994

The error complained of arose from the transmission of assess *197 ment data from the revaluation firm’s computer to the Bergen County Board’s computer. … Board of Assessors of Nassau County, 41 N.Y. 2d 512 , 393 N.Y.S. 2d 965 , 362 N.E.2d 597 (N.Y.1977) and Penn Central Transportation Company v.

Brumit, Patsy v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

2016 TN WC 230 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 4, 2016

Thornton v. RCA Serv. Co., 221 S.W.2d 954, 955 (Tenn. 1949). The Court had an opportunity to observe Ms. … Nonetheless, our Appeals Board held that an employee's lay testimony, without corroborative expert testimony, does not constitute adequate evidence of medical causation. Scott v.

In re the Accounting of Franklin National Bank

12 Misc. 2d 1001 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 1, 1958

Div. 894 ; Brown v. Cohan, 254 App. Div. 20 ; see, also, 23 Carmody-Wait Cyclopedia *1003 of New York Practice, p. 128). … This applies equally as well to costs on appeal in the absence of a direction to the contrary by the appellate court (Fulton Bank v. Beach, 2 Paige ch. 185; 23 Carmody-Wait Cyclopedia of New York Practice, p. 369).

In re the Estate of Patenotre

16 Misc. 2d 64 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1956

Matter of Howley, 133 Misc. 34 ); moneys given by decedent to respondent to be held for decedent’s account (Matter of Gruen, 1 Misc 2d 41 ); a sum equal to the graft paid by a vendor to an agent of the estate (Matter of Browning … (White v. Brown, 5 Lans. 78 ; Treat v. Hathorn, 3 Hun 646 ; Moran v. Abbott, 26 App. Div. 570 ; Delahunty v. Hake, 10 App. Div. 230 ; 7 Carmody’s New York Practice, § 665.)

Girt v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

4 Or. Tax 92 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 15, 1970

No. 4 v. … Co. v.

Hathaway, Terika v. Davidson Transit Organization

2020 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 11, 2020

Cutler-Hammer v. Crabtree, 54 S.W.3d 748, 754 (Tenn. 2001). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Aronson v. Markulin

39 Misc. 2d 273 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Feb 25, 1963

Brown, 19 Misc 2d 957 [App. Term, 1st. Dept.]; South Carolina Leasing Co. v. Allen, 32 Misc 2d 659 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Joffe v. Drake Business School, 35 Misc 2d 442 [App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Fordham Hill Associates v. … Fiebach, 21 Misc 2d 277 ; Best Realty Corp. v. Luftig, supra; Farrell v. Woodward, 101 Misc. 560 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; Giordano v. Loperfide, 203 App. Div. 164 [1st Dept.]; Commercial Cable Bldg. Co. v.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 16, 2003

State v. State Board of Equalization, 630 P.2d 1264 , 1267 (Okla. 1981), a special fund was defined as "all funds which receive funds from taxes, charges, costs, grants, or other revenue." … Board of Commissioners v. Lawrence, 78 P.2d 669 (Okla. 1938) is like Riley , except the plaintiff was a county judge.

Gillum, Mary v. Dollar General Corporation

2020 TN WC App. 25 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 12, 2020

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1989

Cherry v. … Bohart v. Anderson, 103 P. 742 (Okla. 1909).

Amos, Karen v. Chattanooga Goodwill Industries, Inc.

2015 TN WC 156 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 5, 2015

Tindall v. Waring Park Ass'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987); 2 Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 2015). … In Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N Am.

Silva, Jose v. Toni Shouse/R & R Masonry

2015 TN WC 138 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 9, 2015

Reeser v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 938 S.W.2d 690, 692 (Tenn. 1997); Hosford v. Red Rover Preschool, No. 2014-05-0002, 2014 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *20 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Oct. 2, 2014 ). … Fritts v. Safety Nat'! Cas. Corp., 163 S.W.3d 673, 678 (Tenn. 2005). Put another way, the element of causation is satisfied when the "injury has a rational, causal connection to the work." Braden v.

Garassino, Louis v. Western Express, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 59 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 7, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Louis Garassino ) Docket No. 2014-07-0013 ) v. … See Keen v.

Levy v. Appleby

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 258 · New York Marine Court · Oct 15, 1880

The law will not allow that to be done indirectly which.it forbids to be done directly (see Brown v. Treat, 1 Hill, 225 ; Campbell v. Perkins, 8 N. Y. 430 ; People Willett, 6 Abb. Pr. 37 ).

Edmonson v. State

132 Misc. 2d 452 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 23, 1986

Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130 .) … It appears that the Departmental Review Board *455 construes this provision to include the date of confinement. (Cf. General Construction Law § 20.)

In re the Estate of Burr

11 Mills Surr. 317 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1913

In Soper v. … In other cases it has been held that the term “ home ” included board. Harteau v. Harteau, 14 Pick. 186 ; Robinson v. Cushman, 2 Den. 152 . In Willett v.

Uvalde Rock Asphalt Co. v. Asphalt Belt Ry. Co.

262 S.W. 736 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 12, 1924

This question was before the Court of Civil Appeals of the First District in the case of International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Anderson County et al., 150 S. … Lee et al. v. Broocks, 54 Tex. Civ. App. 220 , 118 S. W. 164 ; City of Dallas et al. v. Armour & Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 216 S. W. 222 ; Brown v. Fleming (Tex. Civ App.) 178 S. W. 964 .

Rolla v. Wright

2 Dem. Sur. 482 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1884

Moore v. … In Brown v. Clark (77 N. Y., 369—1879), in Rugg v. Rugg (83 N. Y., 592—1881), and in Matter of Pepoon (91 N.