Case law

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1995

Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v. Grimes, 182 P. 897 (Okla. 1919). … Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v. Grimes, 182 P. 897 , 75 Okl. 219 (Okla. 1919).

Potts v. Kel, LLC

2019 NCBC 29 · North Carolina Business Court · May 9, 2019

Potts v. KEL, LLC, 2019 NCBC 29. … The “inquiry focuses on actual control over the board of directors,” and the undisputed evidence shows that Rives did not possess or exercise control over Steel Tube’s board, which consisted only of Rives and Potts.

WIlliams, Michael v. PMC Biogenex, Inc.

2016 TN WC 88 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 19, 2016

.: 2016-08-0177 Employee, v. … Serious Incident Review Board Reports. Technical record: 1. Petition for Benefit Determination; 2. Dispute Certification Notice; 3.

Opinion No. 69-157 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1969

Section 421, supra, provides for a bank to have, upon approval by the State Banking Board and military installation commander, a detached facility on any military installation located in Oklahoma. … A general definition of credit cards was expressed in Williams v. U.S., 19 F. Supp. 97 (S.D.

Opinion No. 70-136 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 26, 1970

Such audit or audits shall be made as of the end of the fiscal year; provided, however, the local board of education may require that audits be made at more frequent intervals." … In the case of Smith v. Neb.

Anderson v. Anderson Cook Co.

6 Fla. Supp. 164 · Florida Industrial Commission · Oct 19, 1954

Jackson, an attorney representing Griffin’s interests, was the third and remaining member of the board. … See Sweat v. Allen, 200 So. 348 .

Finnegan v. City of Jersey City

20 N.J. Misc. 155 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 21, 1942

As stated by Judge *157 J ess, as president of the State Board of Equalization of Taxes, in an identical situation in the case of Nucoa Butter Co. v. City of Bayonne, 36 N. J. L. … While the statute is not clear, and on its face is susceptible of the contrary conclusion, we are moved by the fact that in the experience of the members of the board, realty mortgage debts have never been claimed or allowed

Dove v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2023 Ohio 1840 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 17, 2023

Eckles v. Conrail, 94 F.3d 1041, 1051 (7th Cir.1996); see also Davis v. … See Lanning v.

Jackson, Brian v. Praxis Industries, Inc.

2018 TN WC 191 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 28, 2018

Bass v. The Home Depot, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 36, at *9 (May 26, 2017). … - ~~L JtmGE ROBERT V.

In Re Rose

144 S.W.3d 661 · United States Special Tribunal of Texas · Jun 10, 2004

Wallace believed that Brown was "grossly incompetent." ( Id.; see V R.R. at 878, 879-80, 883.) Judge Rose took no action with regard to Brown. (IV C.R. No. 58, at 5, Find. 18.) … Wallace still believed Brown to be "grossly incompetent." ( See id.; V R.R. at 878, 879-80.)

Mortgage v. City of Newark

18 N.J. Misc. 34 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 19, 1939

The Essex County Board of Taxation affirmed the assessment on appeal. Under Fidelity Trust Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes of New Jersey (Supreme Court, 1908), 77 N. J. L. 128; 71 Atl. … The judgment of the Essex County Board is reversed, and the assessment ordered vacated.

Parks v. Webb

2018 Ohio 1716 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 17, 2018

[Cite as Parks v. Webb, 2018-Ohio-1716.] MICHAEL R. PARKS Case No. 2017-00995PQ Requester Judge Patrick M. … McGrath v.

Talarico v. Deschutes County Assessor

17 Or. Tax 37 · Oregon Tax Court · Nov 23, 2001

The Oregon Supreme Court held in Lewis v. … The order states that “[t]he Board * * * finds the values on the tax roll of the hereinafter described property.” (Emphasis added.)

In re the Estate of Baffa

139 Misc. 298 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 20, 1931

A like result was attained in the recent case of Armondi v. Dunham ( 221 App. … (Miner v. Brown, 133 N. Y. 308, 311 .) The estate which vests is peculiarly the result or product of the marriage relation. (Jooss v. Fey, 129 N. Y. 17, 19 .) It vests in both as an entirety. (Matter of Lyon, supra.)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1978

OPINION — AG — THE OKLAHOMA STATE BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS IS AUTHORIZED TO EMPLOY PERSONNEL TO ASSIST THE BOARD IN INVESTIGATING AND PROSECUTING ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE OKLAHOMA VETERINARY PRACTICE ACT. … Hammond v. Maxfield, 132 P.2d 660 (1942).

Cheikin v. Jones Beach State Parkway Authority

20 Misc. 2d 811 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1960

In Matter of De Noyer v. Cavanaugh ( 221 N. … (Williams v. State of New York, 308 N. Y. 548 .)

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Proceedings of Dorland

100 Misc. 236 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1917

It also appears that the. decedent paid board during the time he lived in the home of the claimant and that after his death the executors paid a small balance which was still due for board. … Kearney v. McKeon, 85 N. Y. 136 ; Van Slooten v. Wheeler, 140 id. 624; Holt v. Tuite, 188 id. 17; Roberge v. Bonner, 94 App. Div. 342 ; affd., 185 N. Y. 265 .

Newport, Carolyn Sue v. BSH Home Appliance Corp.

2015 TN WC 84 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 16, 2015

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … The Judge must approve the statement of the evidence before the Court Clerk may submit the record to the Clerk of the Appeals Board. 6.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 29, 1957

NON GERMANE DUTIES IMPOSED BY THIS ACT; PAYABLE FROM THE COURT FUND), IT WILL THEREUPON BECOME HIS DUTY TO WRITE ANY OPINION COMING WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF SECT. 2 THAT HE MAY BE THEREAFTER DULY REQUESTED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD … (WRITTEN OPINIONS, COMPOSE OPINIONS) CITE: 19 O.S. 179 .7 [ 19-179.7 ], ARTICLE V, SECTION 32, ARTICLE V, SECTION 46, ARTICLE V, SECTION 59 (FRED HANSEN)

Presbyterian Home at Pennington, Inc. v. Pennington Borough

23 N.J. Tax 473 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 14, 2007

PHP and PHS have the identical board of trustees. The members of the board of PHP are appointed annually by the *488 board of PHS. According to Mr. … Ctr. v.