Case law

Herman Holding Corp. v. Montvale Borough

5 N.J. Tax 199 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 7, 1983

On appeal to the county tax board the assessment made by the local taxing authority is presumed to be correct. On further appeal to the Tax Court a similar presumption attaches to the county board judgment. … Thus, in the instant appeal the taxpayer-appellant has the burden of ultimate persuasion to upset the judgments of the Bergen County Tax Board for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981. See Aetna Life Ins. Co. v.

Borough of Paramus v. County of Bergen

2 N.J. Tax 515 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 26, 1981

N.J.S.A. 54 :4—49 et seq., 52; Paramus v. Bergen Cty., supra. There is a need for the county board to know the effect of the supplemental legislation without undue delay. … See also, N.J.S.A. 54:4-6, authorizing the county board of taxation to provide by rule the method by which the rebate or remission is to be returned to the taxpayers. In Vreeland v.

Wilder, Tom v. Monroe County Government

2023 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 6, 2023

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Tom E. … In Oglesby v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 2017-08-1148, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

Am. Transp. Grp. Ins. Risk Retention Grp. v. Mvt Ins. Servs., Inc.

2021 NCBC 8 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 2, 2021

The same day, Defendants sent another email which warned against dealing with ATGI’s current management and Board of Directors (“Board”): ATGI has fraudulent board issues until you see any order … If you are dealing with a fraud board it will be your responsibility for every you deal with the fraud board.

Simpson, William v. City Auto, LLC

2018 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 13, 2018

Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. … Lee Med., Inc. v.

Bloomington Country Club v. State, Department of Revenue

543 N.E.2d 1 · Indiana Tax Court · Aug 21, 1989

In February of 1984, the Club's Board of Governors changed the above mentioned policy. … In holding for Summit Club, this court cited to Big Foot Country Club v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 18, 1990

TESTA V. KATT, 67 S.CT. 810 , 330 U.S. 386 , 91 L.ED. 967 (1947). A STATE LAW WHICH CONFLICTS WITH THE EXERCISE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S POWER MUST ALWAYS YIELD. FREE V. … IN LAWRENCE COUNTY V.

Griffin v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 6, 2010

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2.

Sullivan v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080531c (or.tax 8-26-2008)

Oregon Tax Court · Aug 26, 2008

Kaady v. Dept. of Rev. , 15 OTR 124 , 125 (2000); see also Parks Westsac L.L.C. v. … Sherman v. Dept. of Rev. , 17 OTR 322 (2004); Oden-Orr v. Multnomah County Assessor , TC-MD No 070295C, WL 1745220 *1 (2007); Frank v. Washington County Assessor , TC-MD No 050170E, WL 1432482 *1 (2005).

Lara, Israel v. Progress Rail Services, Corp.

2019 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 13, 2019

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Cutsinger, Christopher v. Bellsouth Telecommunications LLC

2022 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 19, 2022

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Davis v. N.C. N.C. Highway Patrol

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 30, 2011

Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). 2. … Huff v. Northampton County Board of Education , 259 N.C. 75 , 130 S.E.2d 26 (1963).

Opinion No. 80-122 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1980

A cardinal rule is that public officers, boards, and commissions, created by statute, "have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law." Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Okl., 468 P.2d 501 (1970); Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 (1929).

Hewlett, Angela v. SMX Staffing

2016 TN WC 155 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 1, 2016

McCord v. Advantage Human 2 Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … The Appeals Board will consider the Affidavit of Indigency and issue an Order granting or denying the request for a waiver of the filing fee as soon thereafter as is practicable.

Patton, Naomi v. Lakeshore Heartland

2019 TN WC 151 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 23, 2019

Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 647 (Tenn. 2008) (citing Ingram v. Earthman, 993 S.W.2d 611, 633; Jones v. Coal Creek Mining & Mfg. Co., 180 S.W. 179, 182 (Tenn. 1915). Here, Ms. … Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Cmty Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *11. Lay testimony alone will not suffice. See Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Earheart, John v. Central Transport, Inc.

2023 TN WC App. 6 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 14, 2023

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD John A. … Gonsewski v. Gonsewski, 350 S.W.3d 99, 105 (Tenn. 2011).

Case of De La Montanye

1 Armstrong. Election Cases 183 · New York State Assembly · Jan 9, 1847

These votes were considered by the board of county canvassers erroneously. In considering them, the board allowed to Mr. D’ L’ Montanye the two votes given for John V. L. Montanye, the two given for J. D. L. … He acknowledges no initial V. in his name. He is too much of a Frenchman to be Dutch enough for that, notwithstanding he comes from the neighborhood of Esopus. How, then, can a ballot containing the name “John V. L.

Frankel v. Standard Radio Corp.

50 Misc. 2d 492 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 7, 1966

(Bendernagle v. Cocks, 19 Wend. 207 ; cf. McCargo v. Jergens, 206 N. Y. 363 ; Matter of Pierce v. Brown Buick Co., 258 App. Div. 679 , affd. 283 N.

Moskow v. City of Newton

3 Mass. Supp. 729 · Massachusetts Land Court · Jun 14, 1982

Whittemore v. Building Inspector of Falmouth, 313 Mass. 248, 249 . See Smith v. Board of Appeals of Salem, 313 Mass. 622” (emphasis supplied). … Caires v. Building Commr. of Hingham, 323, 589, 595-596. Raymond v. Commissioner of Pub. Works of Lowell, 333 Mass. 410, 412 . Lanner v. Board of Appeal of Tewksbury, supra.”

Opinion No. 76-106 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1976

Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, 467 P.2d 502 (1970). … City of Bethany v. Hill, 509 P.2d 1364 (1973); Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 422 P.2d 840 (1966).