Case law

Opinion No. 75-332 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 1976

Smith v. State, Okl. Cr., 381 P.2d 900 (1963), states as follows: "The county . . . is a political subdivision of the State of Oklahoma. … Counties have only such authority as is granted by statute (Tulsa Exposition Fair Corp. v.

Stuart v. Strawn Independent School Dist.

36 S.W.2d 480 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 4, 1931

Lyford Independent School District v. Willamar Ind. School District (Tex. Com. App.) 34 S.W.(2d) 854 ; Young v. Edna Ind. School District (Tex. Com. App.) 34 S.W. (2d) 857 ; Pyote Ind. School District v. Dyer (Tex. Com. … School District v. Howard (Tex. Com. App.) 34 S.W.(2d) 840 ; and Brown v. Truscott Ind. School District (Tex. Com. App.) 34 S.W.(2d) 837 . The above cases are not yet reported [in State reports].

In re the Estate of Feldhus

165 Misc. 122 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 23, 1937

(Laurence v. Brown, 5 N. Y. 394, 401) Jewett v. Miller, 10 id. 402, 409 ; Manufacturers’ & Traders’ Bank v. Hazard, 30 id. 226, 230; Continental National Bank v. … (Fowler v. Coates, 201 N. Y. 257, 262 ; Vail v. Long Island R. R. Co., 106 id. 283, 287 ; Calvary Presbyterian Church v. Putnam, 249 id. 111, 115; Beardslee v. Beardslee, 5 Barb. 324, 330 ; Weiss v.

Sherfield v. Unknown

2010 Ohio 4962 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jun 14, 2010

[Cite as Sherfield v. Unknown, 2010-Ohio-4962.] … The entry directed the plaintiff to file an amended complaint which names a state department, board, office, commission, agency, institution, or other state instrumentality as defendant on or before April 23, 2010, or face

Herman Holding Corp. v. Montvale Borough

5 N.J. Tax 199 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 7, 1983

On appeal to the county tax board the assessment made by the local taxing authority is presumed to be correct. On further appeal to the Tax Court a similar presumption attaches to the county board judgment. … Thus, in the instant appeal the taxpayer-appellant has the burden of ultimate persuasion to upset the judgments of the Bergen County Tax Board for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981. See Aetna Life Ins. Co. v.

George v. Williamson

23 S.W.2d 675 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 5, 1930

Bringhurst v. Texas Company, 39 Tex. Civ. App. 500 , 87 S. W. 893 (writ refused); Robb v. Railway, 82 Tex. 392 , 18 S. W. 707 ; Browne Stat. of Frauds, § 115a. … League v. Davis, 53 Tex. 9 ; Pool v. Wedemeyer, 56 Tex. 287 .

Riley v. Unknown

2010 Ohio 6637 · Ohio Court of Claims · Oct 12, 2010

[Cite as Riley v. Unknown, 2010-Ohio-6637.] … RILEY Plaintiff v.

Am. Transp. Grp. Ins. Risk Retention Grp. v. Mvt Ins. Servs., Inc.

2021 NCBC 8 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 2, 2021

The same day, Defendants sent another email which warned against dealing with ATGI’s current management and Board of Directors (“Board”): ATGI has fraudulent board issues until you see any order … If you are dealing with a fraud board it will be your responsibility for every you deal with the fraud board.

Simpson, William v. City Auto, LLC

2018 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 13, 2018

Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. … Lee Med., Inc. v.

Hallock v. Teller

2 Dem. Sur. 206 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1882

(Bowen v. Bowen, 2 Bradf., 336 ; Dye v. Kerr, 15 Barb., 444 ; Robinson v. Cushman, 2 Den., 149 ; Sharp v. Cropsey, 11 Barb., 224 ; Conger v. Van Aernum, 43 Barb., 602 ; Wilcox v. … Wilcox, 48 Barb., 327 ; Matter of Teyn, 2 Redf., 306 ; Keller v. Stuck, 4 Redf., 297 ; Van Kuren v. Saxton, 3 Hun, 547 ; Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y., 312 ; Kearney v. McKeon, 85 N. Y., 139 ).

Sullivan v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 080531c (or.tax 8-26-2008)

Oregon Tax Court · Aug 26, 2008

Kaady v. Dept. of Rev. , 15 OTR 124 , 125 (2000); see also Parks Westsac L.L.C. v. … Sherman v. Dept. of Rev. , 17 OTR 322 (2004); Oden-Orr v. Multnomah County Assessor , TC-MD No 070295C, WL 1745220 *1 (2007); Frank v. Washington County Assessor , TC-MD No 050170E, WL 1432482 *1 (2005).

Lara, Israel v. Progress Rail Services, Corp.

2019 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 13, 2019

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Cutsinger, Christopher v. Bellsouth Telecommunications LLC

2022 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 19, 2022

Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Davis v. N.C. N.C. Highway Patrol

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 30, 2011

Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). 2. … Huff v. Northampton County Board of Education , 259 N.C. 75 , 130 S.E.2d 26 (1963).

Opinion No. 80-122 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1980

A cardinal rule is that public officers, boards, and commissions, created by statute, "have only such authority as is conferred upon them by law." Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Okl., 468 P.2d 501 (1970); Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 (1929).

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 18, 1990

TESTA V. KATT, 67 S.CT. 810 , 330 U.S. 386 , 91 L.ED. 967 (1947). A STATE LAW WHICH CONFLICTS WITH THE EXERCISE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S POWER MUST ALWAYS YIELD. FREE V. … IN LAWRENCE COUNTY V.

In re Sellersville Borough

62 Pa. D. & C.2d 284 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Jul 31, 1973

See also Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., 339 U.S. 594 (1950); R. A. Holman *294 & Co., Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 112 U.S. App. D.C. 43, 47 , 299 F.2d 127, 131 , cert. den. 370 U.S. 911 (1962). … Alessandroni v. Coudersport Borough, 85 Dauph. 82 (1966); Commonwealth ex rel. Alessandroni v. Confluence Borough et al., 87 Dauph. 214 (1967); affirmed 427 Pa. 540 , 234 A. 2d 852 (1967).

Case of De La Montanye

1 Armstrong. Election Cases 183 · New York State Assembly · Jan 9, 1847

These votes were considered by the board of county canvassers erroneously. In considering them, the board allowed to Mr. D’ L’ Montanye the two votes given for John V. L. Montanye, the two given for J. D. L. … He acknowledges no initial V. in his name. He is too much of a Frenchman to be Dutch enough for that, notwithstanding he comes from the neighborhood of Esopus. How, then, can a ballot containing the name “John V. L.

Frankel v. Standard Radio Corp.

50 Misc. 2d 492 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 7, 1966

(Bendernagle v. Cocks, 19 Wend. 207 ; cf. McCargo v. Jergens, 206 N. Y. 363 ; Matter of Pierce v. Brown Buick Co., 258 App. Div. 679 , affd. 283 N.

Opinion No. 76-106 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1976

Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, 467 P.2d 502 (1970). … City of Bethany v. Hill, 509 P.2d 1364 (1973); Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 422 P.2d 840 (1966).