Case law

Commissioner of Social Services v. Otilio O.

70 Misc. 2d 581 · New York Family Court · Feb 7, 1972

B. v. Lonnie J. … Even more in point is the decision in Green v. Brown ( 65 Misc 2d 226 ) where the County Attorney also appeared for the petitioner.

Eastland County v. Chapman

276 S.W. 654 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 28, 1925

In Middlekauff v. State Banking Board, 111 Tex. 561 , 242 S. W. 442 , the Supreme Court, through Mr. … The case of State Banking Board v. Pilcher, 270 S. W. 1004 , by the Commission of Appeals, Section A; is even more helpful in determining the question before us.

Holley, Medaris v. Southwest Airlines Co.

2024 TN WC 21 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 14, 2024

Int’l Playing Card and Label Co., Inc. v. Broyles, 381 S.W.2d 888, 892 (Tenn. 1964). But the second interaction did provide Southwest with actual knowledge. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Brown

1 Mills Surr. 143 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1899

See, also, Ross v. Roberts, 2 Hun, 90 ; affirmed, 63 N. … Carr v. Smith, 25 App. Div. 214 .

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Eyett

124 Misc. 523 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 2, 1925

Y. 615, 617 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 id. 369; Matter of Pepoon, 91 id. 255; Matter of Cottrell, 95 id. 329; Everitt v. Everitt, 41 Barb. 385 ; Rider v. Legg, 51 id. 260.) … Div. 7 , and cases therein cited; Everitt v. Everitt, 41 Barb. 385 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 .) This rule is very old. (Losee v. Losee, 2 Hill, 612 .)

In re the Estate of Brown

143 Misc. 688 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 10, 1932

(Cudney v. Cudney, 68 N. Y. 148 ; Dobie v. Armstrong, 160 id. 584.) … The paper propounded, which bears date the 28th day of December, 1931, will be admitted to probate as the last will and testament of Andrew Brown and a decree may be entered accordingly.

Edwards v. Edwards

1 Dem. Sur. 132 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1882

S., part. 2, ch. 6, tit. 3, § 65, *135 3 Banks, 6th ed., 102; Brown v. Brown, 53 Barb., 217 ; Stiles v. Burch, 5 Paige, 132 ; Gill v. Brouwer, 37 N. Y., 543 ). … While this claim is not free from doubt, I have decided to uphold it (Smith v. Lawrence, 11 Paige, 806 ). Ordered accordingly.

People v. Ricchio

135 Misc. 2d 108 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Apr 15, 1987

The section further grants the Loft Board the power to punish violations of any rule or regulations it has promulgated by a civil penalty to be determined by the Loft Board not to exceed $1,000. … (Enki Props. v Loft Bd., 128 Misc 2d 485 [Sup Ct, NY County 1985].) Owner failure to meet those obligations is punishable by the Loft Board. Tenant violations of this kind are not within its purview.

Culler v. Administrative Office of the Courts

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 22, 2007

. § 143-291 (a) confers jurisdiction on the Industrial Commission to hear tort claims founded in negligence against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Stat. § 1A-1 , Rule 12(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure; Lane v. City of Kinston , 142 N.C. App. 622 , 544 S.E.2d 810 (2000). 4.

Santiago, Manuel v. Wayne Johnson dba Omega Home Improvements

2016 TN WC 184 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 9, 2016

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015). … Buchanan v. Car/ex Glass Co., No. 2015-01-0012, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Sept. 29, 2015).

In re Beddia

201 Misc. 486 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 28, 1951

Pursuant to this commitment and in October, 1940, the Home boarded out the infant to the general guardian who is unrelated to the infant. … Letters of guardianship were duly issued to the boarding mother on May 22, 1946.

Opinion No. 71-438 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972

In the case of Cummings v. … (Emphasis added) The above quoted language from the case of Cummings v. Board of Education, supra, would seem to be determinative of your question.

Valladares, Lazaro v. Transco Products, Inc., et al. & Williams Specialty Services, LLC., et al.

2016 TN WC App. 34 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 27, 2016

Snyder v. … Doe v.

Johnson v. Johnson

14 Wend. 637 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1835

Worely v. Worely, 1 Haggard, 734. … Vide Durant v. Durant, 1 Hagg. Ecc. R. 733, 761, 762; Bramwell v. Bramwell, 3 id. 635; 5 Eng. Ecc. Rep. 241.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1996

Baker, 718 P.2d 351 (court citing Board of Trustees v. Burns, 348 P.2d 1067 (Okla. 1959); and Board of Trustees v. … Taylor, 897 P.2d at 279 [Court citing Betts v. Board of Administration, supra, and Allen v.

Tennyson v. Saver's Painting and Wallcovering, LLC.

2019 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 16, 2019

Doe 1 v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Nashville, 154 S.W.3d 22, 42 (Tenn. 2005); Benton v. Snyder, 825 S.W.2d 409, 416 (Tenn. 1992); Loveall v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 694 S.W.2d 937, 939 (Tenn. 1985). … Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 249 S.W.3d 346, 358 (Tenn. 2008). “Whether a court applied an incorrect legal standard is a question of law that is reviewed de novo.” Funk v.

Hinceman v. Food Lion

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 14, 2009

Robert Yapundich, a board certified neurologist at Neurology Associates, for complaints of headaches. Dr. … See Mangum v. Brown , 200 N.C. 296 , 156 S.E. 535 (1931); Cox v. Jefferson-Pilot Fire Casualty Co. , 80 N.C. App. 122 , 341 S.E.2d 608 (1986). 2.

Wilson v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 15, 2008

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions, and agencies of the State … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3. The terms of the Tort Claims Act must be strictly construed. Northwestern Distributors, Inc. v. N.C.

Bullard, Kimberly v. Facilities Performance Group

2018 TN WC App. 37 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 7, 2018

See Orman v. … See Carter v.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2005

Leasing, Inc. v. State ex rel. State Bd. of Pub. Affairs, 737 P.2d 1191 , 1195 (Okla. 1987)) (emphasis added). … Nat'l Bank v. State ex rel.