Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.28s
143 Misc. 688 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 10, 1932
(Cudney v. Cudney, 68 N. Y. 148 ; Dobie v. Armstrong, 160 id. 584.) … The paper propounded, which bears date the 28th day of December, 1931, will be admitted to probate as the last will and testament of Andrew Brown and a decree may be entered accordingly.
Cited 2 timesPublished1 Dem. Sur. 132 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1882
S., part. 2, ch. 6, tit. 3, § 65, *135 3 Banks, 6th ed., 102; Brown v. Brown, 53 Barb., 217 ; Stiles v. Burch, 5 Paige, 132 ; Gill v. Brouwer, 37 N. Y., 543 ). … While this claim is not free from doubt, I have decided to uphold it (Smith v. Lawrence, 11 Paige, 806 ). Ordered accordingly.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHerman Holding Corp. v. Montvale Borough
5 N.J. Tax 199 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 7, 1983
On appeal to the county tax board the assessment made by the local taxing authority is presumed to be correct. On further appeal to the Tax Court a similar presumption attaches to the county board judgment. … Thus, in the instant appeal the taxpayer-appellant has the burden of ultimate persuasion to upset the judgments of the Bergen County Tax Board for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981. See Aetna Life Ins. Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHolley, Medaris v. Southwest Airlines Co.
2024 TN WC 21 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 14, 2024
Int’l Playing Card and Label Co., Inc. v. Broyles, 381 S.W.2d 888, 892 (Tenn. 1964). But the second interaction did provide Southwest with actual knowledge. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedValladares, Lazaro v. Transco Products, Inc., et al. & Williams Specialty Services, LLC., et al.
2016 TN WC App. 34 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 27, 2016
Snyder v. … Doe v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHampton-Bey v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 26, 2011
. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 4.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Brown
1 Mills Surr. 143 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1899
See, also, Ross v. Roberts, 2 Hun, 90 ; affirmed, 63 N. … Carr v. Smith, 25 App. Div. 214 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedLee, Courtney v. Federal Express Corporation
2022 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 5, 2022
Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1989
proposed by a resolution of the governing body, the notice required under 11 O.S. 13 -11 (2) is spelled out in 11 O.S. 13 -106 which provides as follows: Within twenty (20) days after receipt of the proposed charter from the board … Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County, 698 P.2d 930 (Okla. 1985). Where the meaning of the statute is clear and unambiguous there is no room for further construction to determine legislative intent Fuller v.
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Wend. 637 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1835
Worely v. Worely, 1 Haggard, 734. … Vide Durant v. Durant, 1 Hagg. Ecc. R. 733, 761, 762; Bramwell v. Bramwell, 3 id. 635; 5 Eng. Ecc. Rep. 241.
Cited 34 timesPublishedDavis v. N.C. N.C. Highway Patrol
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 30, 2011
Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). 2. … Huff v. Northampton County Board of Education , 259 N.C. 75 , 130 S.E.2d 26 (1963).
Cited 0 timesPublished26 N.J. Misc. 1 · Hoboken City Recorder's Court. · Oct 16, 1947
See Lipkin v. Duffy, 119 N. J. L. 366; 196 Atl. Rep. 434 ; South Orange v. Heller, 92 N. J. Eq. 505; 113 Atl. Rep. 697 .” In the case of Phillips v. The Town of Belleville, 135 N. J. L. 271; 52 Atl. … As enacted, the Board of Commissioners may at will authorize or deny a request for the erection of gasoline stations. Such arbitrary exercise of the police power cannot be upheld.” In the case of Keavey v. Randall, 1 N.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKaramanos Holdings Inc. II v. Dept. of Rev.
21 Or. Tax 204 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 20, 2013
II v. Dept. of Rev. requirements of ORS 305.288. … II v. Dept. of Rev. as referring only to accounts R278439 and P623373.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2005
Leasing, Inc. v. State ex rel. State Bd. of Pub. Affairs, 737 P.2d 1191 , 1195 (Okla. 1987)) (emphasis added). … Nat'l Bank v. State ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith, William Edward, Jr. v. The Newman Group, LLC
2015 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 21, 2015
See, e.g., Childress v. … WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD William Edward Smith, Jr. ) Docket No. 2015-08-0075 )' v. )
Cited 0 timesPublishedSimpson, William v. City Auto, LLC
2018 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 13, 2018
Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. … Lee Med., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972
In the case of Cummings v. … (Emphasis added) The above quoted language from the case of Cummings v. Board of Education, supra, would seem to be determinative of your question.
Cited 0 timesPublished186 Misc. 857 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 16, 1945
(Greene v. Greene, 125 N. Y. 506 ; Woodbridge v. Boches, 170 N. Y. 596 ; Weeks v. Frankel, 197 N. Y. 304 ; Matter of Connolly, 158 Misc. 93 ; Matter of Riggs, 158 Misc. 95 .) … (Matter of Hayden, supra; Matter of Littman, 165 Misc. 285 ; Ireland v. Ireland, 84 N. Y. 321 ; Hamilton v. Drogo, 241 N. Y. 401, 404 ; Bloodgood v. Lewis, 209 N. Y. 95 ; Matter of Sand v. Beach, 270 N.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPerry, Bryant C. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water
2016 TN WC 120 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 17, 2016
Tindall v. Waring Park Ass 'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987); 2 Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review
Cited 0 timesPublishedHasemeier v. City of Cincinnati
1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 61 · Hamilton County Court of Insolvency · May 2, 1903
The ordinance to improve Pink alley passed by the board of legislation October 8, 1900, provides that the costs and expenses of said improvement, including-the damages, etc., shall be assessed upon the lots and lands hereinafter … John V. Campbell, contra. A valid assessment can only be made in the methods provided by the statutes.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna