Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.28s

  • In re the Estate of Brown

    143 Misc. 688 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 10, 1932

    (Cudney v. Cudney, 68 N. Y. 148 ; Dobie v. Armstrong, 160 id. 584.) … The paper propounded, which bears date the 28th day of December, 1931, will be admitted to probate as the last will and testament of Andrew Brown and a decree may be entered accordingly.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. Edwards

    1 Dem. Sur. 132 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1882

    S., part. 2, ch. 6, tit. 3, § 65, *135 3 Banks, 6th ed., 102; Brown v. Brown, 53 Barb., 217 ; Stiles v. Burch, 5 Paige, 132 ; Gill v. Brouwer, 37 N. Y., 543 ). … While this claim is not free from doubt, I have decided to uphold it (Smith v. Lawrence, 11 Paige, 806 ). Ordered accordingly.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herman Holding Corp. v. Montvale Borough

    5 N.J. Tax 199 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 7, 1983

    On appeal to the county tax board the assessment made by the local taxing authority is presumed to be correct. On further appeal to the Tax Court a similar presumption attaches to the county board judgment. … Thus, in the instant appeal the taxpayer-appellant has the burden of ultimate persuasion to upset the judgments of the Bergen County Tax Board for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981. See Aetna Life Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Holley, Medaris v. Southwest Airlines Co.

    2024 TN WC 21 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 14, 2024

    Int’l Playing Card and Label Co., Inc. v. Broyles, 381 S.W.2d 888, 892 (Tenn. 1964). But the second interaction did provide Southwest with actual knowledge. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Valladares, Lazaro v. Transco Products, Inc., et al. & Williams Specialty Services, LLC., et al.

    2016 TN WC App. 34 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 27, 2016

    Snyder v. … Doe v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hampton-Bey v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 26, 2011

    . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Brown

    1 Mills Surr. 143 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1899

    See, also, Ross v. Roberts, 2 Hun, 90 ; affirmed, 63 N. … Carr v. Smith, 25 App. Div. 214 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lee, Courtney v. Federal Express Corporation

    2022 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 5, 2022

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1989

    proposed by a resolution of the governing body, the notice required under 11 O.S. 13 -11 (2) is spelled out in 11 O.S. 13 -106 which provides as follows: Within twenty (20) days after receipt of the proposed charter from the board … Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County, 698 P.2d 930 (Okla. 1985). Where the meaning of the statute is clear and unambiguous there is no room for further construction to determine legislative intent Fuller v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Johnson

    14 Wend. 637 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1835

    Worely v. Worely, 1 Haggard, 734. … Vide Durant v. Durant, 1 Hagg. Ecc. R. 733, 761, 762; Bramwell v. Bramwell, 3 id. 635; 5 Eng. Ecc. Rep. 241.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Davis v. N.C. N.C. Highway Patrol

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 30, 2011

    Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). 2. … Huff v. Northampton County Board of Education , 259 N.C. 75 , 130 S.E.2d 26 (1963).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mayor of Hoboken v. Bauer

    26 N.J. Misc. 1 · Hoboken City Recorder's Court. · Oct 16, 1947

    See Lipkin v. Duffy, 119 N. J. L. 366; 196 Atl. Rep. 434 ; South Orange v. Heller, 92 N. J. Eq. 505; 113 Atl. Rep. 697 .” In the case of Phillips v. The Town of Belleville, 135 N. J. L. 271; 52 Atl. … As enacted, the Board of Commissioners may at will authorize or deny a request for the erection of gasoline stations. Such arbitrary exercise of the police power cannot be upheld.” In the case of Keavey v. Randall, 1 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Karamanos Holdings Inc. II v. Dept. of Rev.

    21 Or. Tax 204 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 20, 2013

    II v. Dept. of Rev. requirements of ORS 305.288. … II v. Dept. of Rev. as referring only to accounts R278439 and P623373.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2005

    Leasing, Inc. v. State ex rel. State Bd. of Pub. Affairs, 737 P.2d 1191 , 1195 (Okla. 1987)) (emphasis added). … Nat'l Bank v. State ex rel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith, William Edward, Jr. v. The Newman Group, LLC

    2015 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 21, 2015

    See, e.g., Childress v. … WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD William Edward Smith, Jr. ) Docket No. 2015-08-0075 )' v. )

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Simpson, William v. City Auto, LLC

    2018 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 13, 2018

    Conner delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. … Lee Med., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-438 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1972

    In the case of Cummings v. … (Emphasis added) The above quoted language from the case of Cummings v. Board of Education, supra, would seem to be determinative of your question.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Wade

    186 Misc. 857 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 16, 1945

    (Greene v. Greene, 125 N. Y. 506 ; Woodbridge v. Boches, 170 N. Y. 596 ; Weeks v. Frankel, 197 N. Y. 304 ; Matter of Connolly, 158 Misc. 93 ; Matter of Riggs, 158 Misc. 95 .) … (Matter of Hayden, supra; Matter of Littman, 165 Misc. 285 ; Ireland v. Ireland, 84 N. Y. 321 ; Hamilton v. Drogo, 241 N. Y. 401, 404 ; Bloodgood v. Lewis, 209 N. Y. 95 ; Matter of Sand v. Beach, 270 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Perry, Bryant C. v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water

    2016 TN WC 120 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 17, 2016

    Tindall v. Waring Park Ass 'n, 725 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tenn. 1987); 2 Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hasemeier v. City of Cincinnati

    1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 61 · Hamilton County Court of Insolvency · May 2, 1903

    The ordinance to improve Pink alley passed by the board of legislation October 8, 1900, provides that the costs and expenses of said improvement, including-the damages, etc., shall be assessed upon the lots and lands hereinafter … John V. Campbell, contra. A valid assessment can only be made in the methods provided by the statutes.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.