Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.69s
Garlock, Autumn v. O’Reilly Wooten 2000, LLC, d/b/a O’Reilly Auto Parts,
2023 TN WC 68 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 27, 2023
In Roper v. Allegis Group, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In Iboy v. Kenten Management, LLC, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublished178 Misc. 2d 496 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 14, 1998
and it is not necessary to determine the respective contentions of the parties on the issue of whether the lien would attach to the recovery even if the claimant had no right to any portion of the recovery (see, Sillato v … Accordingly, the objections to the account filed on behalf of the Crime Victims Board are sustained.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Employers' Ins. v. Jackson
265 S.W. 1027 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 19, 1924
In the case of Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 108 Tex. 109 , 185 S. … In the case of Middleton v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedIn re of the Estate of Southard
150 Misc. 248 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 22, 1934
That theory, for wMch support is sometimes supposed to be found in such authorities as Rousseau v. Rouss ( 180 N. Y. 116 ); Hamlin v. Stevens (177 id. 39); Wallace v. … (McKeon v. Van Slyck, 223 N. Y. 392 ; Ward v. New York Life lns.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 1, 2009
Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College , 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E.2d 137 (1944). … Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College , 224 N.C. at 11 , 29 S.E.2d at 137 *Page 8 7. Defendant largely controlled the time of work, frequently providing Plaintiff's transportation to job sites.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1991
. ¶ 14 The distinctions between a trust and an ordinary contractual debt were also recognized by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in McFarling v. … United Airlines, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 789 P.2d 1305 , 1311 (Okla. 1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 2004
Belle v. State, 516 P.2d 551 , 552 (Okla.Crim. 1973). See also White v. State, 702 P.2d 1058 , 1062 (Okla. … In Woolen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWright, Carla v. Cookeville Regional Medical Center
2017 TN WC App. 20 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 8, 2017
See Lee Med, Inc. v. … See State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2010 Ohio 3643 · Ohio Court of Claims · Mar 19, 2010
[Cite as Huber v. Unknown, 2010-Ohio-3643.] … HUBER Plaintiff v. Case No. 2010-02022-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBunch v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 16, 2009
Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen. … . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHernandez, Andres v. SMS, Inc., d/b/a Master Stucco
2023 TN WC App. 27 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 6, 2023
Id. at *10 (citing Masiers v. … In Lindsey v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1977
, commission or special appropriation on a percentage basis, in that ratio that the total appropriation for such department, institution, board, commission or special appropriation from each fund for that fiscal year bears … See, Boswell v. State, 181 Okl. 435 , 74 P.2d 940 (1938). This obviously would include the income tax revenue to be allocated to the special agency account of the Tax Commission.
Cited 0 timesPublished200 Misc. 624 · New York Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1951
(Cullings v. Goetz, 256 N. Y. 287 ; Dennis v. Rockefeller Center, 270 App. Div. 524 .) … (Appel v. Mutter, 262 N. Y. 278 ; Zolezzi v. Bruce-Brown, 243 N. Y. 490 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedOelbermann Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Borov
141 Misc. 2d 838 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 15, 1988
The Board of Estimate adopted that recommendation. … Board of Estimate & Apportionment, 232 NY 377, 392-393 ; Admiral Realty Co. v City of New York, 206 NY 110, 139-140 ; Matter of Church, 92 NY 1, 5 ; People v Dunn, 157 NY 528, 540 ; cf., Farrington v Pinckney, 1 NY2d 74,
Cited 2 timesPublished2011 Ohio 6933 · Ohio Court of Claims · Aug 23, 2011
[Cite as Hastings v. Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-6933.] … See Sandu v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2008-02606-AD, 2008-Ohio-6858, Gerzina v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2010-09809-AD, 2011-Ohio-1952.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliamson v. Department of Revenue
9 Or. Tax 166 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 25, 1982
See Price v. Dept. of Rev., 7 OTR 18 (1977). … See Widmer v. Department of Revenue, 4 OTR 361 (1971), aff’d 261 Or 371 , 494 P2d 854 (1972).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCravens, Cathy v. Cummins Filtration, Inc.
2022 TN WC App. 25 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 23, 2022
See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … In Langford v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDucommun v. The Ohio Statehouse
2011 Ohio 3152 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jun 7, 2011
See also Case No. 2011-03111 -2- ENTRY Gilbert v. Summit County, 104 Ohio St.3d 660, 2004-Ohio-7108, citing Temple v. … Brown Sharon S. Ducommun Velda K.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSutton v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
2026 Ohio 1182 · Ohio Court of Claims · Mar 25, 2026
As Cintron states, a copy of the Rules Infraction Board packet is attached to his affidavit. … The packet also includes summaries of testimony before the Rules Infraction Board, the Disposition of the Rules Infraction Board affirming all the rules infractions charged by Cintron, a Notice of Disciplinary Appeal and
Cited 0 timesPublishedGibbs, Doris v. Express Services, Inc.
2021 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 12, 2021
See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna