Case law

Hastings v. Dept. of Transp.

2011 Ohio 6933 · Ohio Court of Claims · Aug 23, 2011

[Cite as Hastings v. Dept. of Transp., 2011-Ohio-6933.] … See Sandu v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2008-02606-AD, 2008-Ohio-6858, Gerzina v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., Ct. of Cl. No. 2010-09809-AD, 2011-Ohio-1952.

Reber v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 14, 2011

. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Pulley v. Rex Hospital , 326 N.C. 701 , 392 S.E.2d 380 (1990). 5. Defendant's employees owe a duty of reasonable care to prevent reasonably foreseeable injury to inmates within its custody and control. Taylor v. N.C.

Williamson v. Department of Revenue

9 Or. Tax 166 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 25, 1982

See Price v. Dept. of Rev., 7 OTR 18 (1977). … See Widmer v. Department of Revenue, 4 OTR 361 (1971), aff’d 261 Or 371 , 494 P2d 854 (1972).

Cravens, Cathy v. Cummins Filtration, Inc.

2022 TN WC App. 25 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 23, 2022

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … In Langford v. Liberty Mutual Ins.

Ducommun v. The Ohio Statehouse

2011 Ohio 3152 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jun 7, 2011

See also  Case No. 2011-03111 -2- ENTRY Gilbert v. Summit County, 104 Ohio St.3d 660, 2004-Ohio-7108, citing Temple v. … Brown Sharon S. Ducommun Velda K.

Sutton v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2026 Ohio 1182 · Ohio Court of Claims · Mar 25, 2026

As Cintron states, a copy of the Rules Infraction Board packet is attached to his affidavit. … The packet also includes summaries of testimony before the Rules Infraction Board, the Disposition of the Rules Infraction Board affirming all the rules infractions charged by Cintron, a Notice of Disciplinary Appeal and

Gibbs, Doris v. Express Services, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 12, 2021

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015).

Limberakis, George v. Pro-Tech Security, Inc.

2017 TN WC App. 51 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 12, 2017

See Seiber v. Reeves Logging, 284 S.W.3d 294, 298 (Tenn. 2009); Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-02- 0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App Bd. LEXIS 14, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. … Kennedy v. Lakeway Auto Sales, Inc., E2010-02422- WC-R3-WC, 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 842, at *8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Aug. 30, 2011) (quoting Carter v. Shoney’s Inc., 845 S.W.2d 740, 742-44 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

People v. Farrar

120 Misc. 2d 464 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 15, 1983

(People v Reid, 95 Misc 2d 822 ; People v Brown, 81 Misc 2d 149 ; People v Williams, 93 Misc 2d 726 ; see, also, 2 NY Criminal Jury Instructions, p 968.) … (United States v Brown, 309 A2d 256, 257 [DC App]; People v Williams, supra.)

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1989

CLOUD V. … OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, 696 P. 2D 10 (OKL. APP. 1984), WHERE THE MAJORITY OPINION DEEMS THE SUPREME COURT TO HAVE MODIFIED CLOUD IN ITS LATER OPINION IN STONE V.

Wilson, Louis v. O. G. Kelley and Company

2019 TN WC App. 13 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 15, 2019

Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … Pentecost v. Anchor Wire Corp., 695 S.W.2d 183, 185 (Tenn. 1985). In Mahle, Inc. v. Rouse, No. E2005-02432-WC-R3-CV, 2006 Tenn. LEXIS 939 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 3, 1995

Ledbetter v. … See City of Duncan v.

Opinion No. 77-136 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1977

, commission or special appropriation on a percentage basis, in that ratio that the total appropriation for such department, institution, board, commission or special appropriation from each fund for that fiscal year bears … See, Boswell v. State, 181 Okl. 435 , 74 P.2d 940 (1938). This obviously would include the income tax revenue to be allocated to the special agency account of the Tax Commission.

Seagrave Establishment, Inc. v. Goldberg

130 Misc. 2d 467 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 10, 1985

(See, Lyndhurst Assoc. v Drachman, 130 Misc 2d 255 .) … Elwick Ltd. v. Howard, [ 111 AD2d 73 ]; Ziess v. Semenov, [ 126 Misc 2d 917 ]; OHA, Sec. 41, Sec. 55)” (emphasis added).

de Mello v. 79th Street Tenants Corp.

136 Misc. 2d 73 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 6, 1987

In November 1983, prior to plaintiff’s sale, the board of directors exercised its authority to continue the imposition of the fee for another three years following expiration. In Fe Bland v Two Trees Mgt. … The answer lies in a rereading of Fe Bland v Two Trees Mgt. Co. (supra).

Swenarton v. Hancock

9 Abb. N. Cas. 326 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1879

Thacher’s family in Brooklyn, where she was keeping a boarding-house, and continued to board with her until 1868,' when, she removed to Orange, N. … Delafield v. Parish, 25 N. Y. 9 .

Suggs-Jacobs v. Physicians Weight Loss Ctr. of Am., Inc.

2003 NCBC 8 · North Carolina Business Court · Jan 5, 2003

(“the Medical Board”) filed a formal complaint against Dr. … The Medical Board found that Dr. Weisner’s conduct was unethical.

Nahmens v. Copely

2 Dem. Sur. 253 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1883

For example, the beneficiary was an annuitant in Craig v. Craig ( 3 Barb. Ch., 76 ); and in Booth v. Ammerman, 4 Bradf., 129 ). Williamson v. … Obs., 179 ; Estate of Daniel Devlin, 1 Tucker, 460; Pierce v. Chamberlain, 41 How. Pr., 501 ; Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y., 136 ; Lupton v. Lupton, 2 Johns. Ch., 614 ).

Goldberg v. City of Atlantic

4 N.J. Tax 195 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 23, 1982

The firm represented taxpayers before the county board of taxation. … Bartels v.

Thorpe v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 12, 2011

. § 143-291 (a) (2007) confers upon the North Carolina Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear negligence claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions … See Isenhour v. Hutto , 350 N.C. 601 , 604 , 517 S.E.2d 121 , 124 (1999). 4.