Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.12s
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 2, 2002
Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co ., 305 N.C. 593 , 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982), Watkins v. Central Motor Lines , 279 N.C. 132 , 181 S.E.2d 588 (1971). 3. … Stat. § 97-25 ; Hyler v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTownsend v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor
2019 Ohio 5105 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 6, 2019
of county commissioners, board of elections, all other county officers and boards, and all tax-supported public libraries and requiring the prosecuting attorney to prosecute and defend all suits and actions that any such … Barb v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Cited 0 timesPublished171 A.3d 367 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016
OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BARTON Respondent Kenneth Miller (Respondent Miller), a former Senior Magisterial District Judge, appears before this Court in response to a Complaint filed by the Judicial Conduct Board. … Article V, § 18(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants to the Judicial Conduct Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause to File formal charges against a judicial officer, in this Court, and thereafter
Cited 0 timesPublished171 A.3d 367 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016
OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BARTON Respondent Kenneth Miller (Respondent Miller), a former Senior Magisterial District Judge, appears before this Court in response to a Complaint filed by the Judicial Conduct Board. … Article V, § 18(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants to the Judicial Conduct Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause to File formal charges against a judicial officer, in this Court, and thereafter
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Application for Probate of the Will of Lockwood
2 Connoly 118 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1889
Schouler, Wills, §§ 159, 161; Morse v. Scott, 4 Dem. 507 ; Matter of Doorman, 5 Dem. 112 . … Matter of McCue’s Will, 17 W’kly Dig. 502; Society v. Hopper, 33 N. Y. 624 , 625; Clapp v. Fullerton, 34 N. Y. 190 ; Keeler’s Will, 12 St. Rep. 155 -157; Matter of Weil, 1 N. Y. Supp. 91 .
Cited 3 timesPublished194 Misc. 492 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1949
(Hayden v. Pierce, 144 N. Y. 512, 516 .) … Y. 233, 238 ; citing Sexauer & Lemke v. Burke & Sons Co., 228 N. Y. 341, 345 . See, also, Matter of Moore v. Board of Education, Canandaigua, 274 App. Div. 403, 410 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.
2021 TN WC App. 66 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 21, 2021
Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., 4 Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1980
Tulsa Exposition and Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, 468 P.2d 501 , 507 , 508 (Okl. 1970), held: "Counties have only such authority as is granted by statute. Citing cases . . . … The Board of County Commissioners in exercising corporate powers is limited to those fields expressly assigned to such subdivisions of the state by the legislature. Citing cases . . .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 1979
The State Motorpool is created under the direction of the State Board of Public Affairs by the provisions of 47 O.S. 159 .1 (1971). … See Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal CIT Credit Corp. 301 P.2d 212 (Okla. 1956).
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Misc. 310 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1920
See Garr v. Bright, 1 Barb. Ch. 157 ; Kiersted v. People, 1 Abb. Pr. 392 ; Coster v. City of Albany, 43 N. Y. 399 ; People v. Dennison, 84 id. 272; Rexford v. State of New York, 105 id. 229; Locke v. … State of New York, *316 140 id. 480; Smith v. State of New York, 227 id. 405; Cunningham v. Macon & Brunswick R. R. Co., 109 U. S. 446 ; Board of Liquidation v. McComb, 92 id. 351; Briscoe v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBorough of Grove City v. Commonwealth
68 Pa. D. & C.2d 768 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Apr 10, 1975
See Commonwealth v. Niemeyer Oldsmobile, Inc., 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 388 , 316 A.2d 152 (1974); Iannotta v. Phila. Transportation Co., 11 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 156 , 312 A.2d 475 (1973); General v. E. … See DiFrancis v. Commonwealth, Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev., 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 514 , 333 A.2d 202 (1975).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPool, Ronald v. Jarmon D&Q Transport
2016 TN WC App. 8 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Feb 18, 2016
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Ronald Pool ) Docket No. 2015-06-0510 ) v. … See Crane Enamelware Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1979
Dear Director Edmison, The Attorney General is in receipt of your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: May the Pollution Control Coordinating Board adopt a rule or regulation which redefines … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1980
Ponca City v. Edwards, Okl., 460 P.2d 418 (1969). … The Legislature has left to the municipal governing board the discretion as to which form of financial institution may be utilized.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 Mills Surr. 542 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 15, 1910
Brown, S. This is an appeal from an order made in the above-entitled matter upon the report of Hon. Robert Averill,. appraiser, which order was entered on D'ecember 4, 1909. … Ford v. Knapp, 102 N. Y. 142 ; Jones v. Duerk, 25 App. Div. 551 ; Satterlee v. Kobbe, 173 N. Y. 91 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1971
In our opinion, these provisions in effect restate the judicial interpretation of Article V , Section 23 , of the Oklahoma Constitution. … The 1963 Attorney General's opinion was considered by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in State of Oklahoma ex rel Settles v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBaccallao, Amalia v. Javier H. Sanabria DBA Cleaning Service
2020 TN WC 105 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 14, 2020
.: 2019-04-0203A Employee, ) 2019-04-0203B v. ) 2019-04-0203C Javier H. … The Workers ' Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKent State University v. University Coffee House, Inc.
120 Ohio Misc. 2d 9 · Ohio Court of Claims · Sep 10, 2002
. {¶ 22} Freshmen and sophomores were required to purchase a board plan. Students on the board plan could make purchases using board cards, comparable to debit cards, that deducted payment from a prepaid board plan. … Kelly v. Med. Life Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublished2017 NCBC 58 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 12, 2017
Even after WW formed a board of directors in February 2011, Plaintiffs allege that the board’s actions continued to reflect decisions that advanced Ms. Whitworth’s personal interests over the interests of WW. … F, K), (iii) the re- instatement of a board of directors, (Roland TAC ¶ 209; Lomax TAC ¶ 308), and (iv) board minutes suggesting collective decision making, (Roland TAC Exs. R, O; Lomax TAC Exs.
Cited 2 timesPublished60 Misc. 2d 1073 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 11, 1969
S. 50 ; Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 ; Conner v. City of Hammond, 389 U. S. 48 .) (United States v. 4,400 Copies of Magazines, 276 F. Supp. 902 .) … (People v. G. I. Distrs., 20 N Y 2d 104, 107; see Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463 , n. 3 dissent by Stewart, J.; cf. People v. Brown, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 19, 1968, p. 20, col. 4.)
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna