Case law

Hayes, Anthony v. Elmington Property Management

2022 TN WC App. 2 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 13, 2022

Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Hessmer v. Hessmer, 138 S.W.3d 901, 903-04 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (citations omitted).

Cotton, Alan v. HUMACare, Inc.

2016 TN WC 72 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 24, 2016

See Marron v. Scarbrough, 314 S. W.2d 165, 181 (Tenn. Ct. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review.

Johnson, Landon v Loomis Armored

2018 TN WC 205 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 17, 2018

It cited Beecher v. McKesson Corp., 2017 Tenn. Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 41 (July 21, 2017), and Payne v. D and D Elec., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

Duquesne v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 31, 2010

Under the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … See Stone v. N.C. Dep't of Labor , 347 N.C. 473 , 479 , 495 S.E.2d 711 , 714-15 (1998) and Wirth v. Bracey , 258 N.C. 505 , 507-08 , 128 S.E.2d 810 , 813 (1963). 2.

Boutros, Nesreen v. Amazon

2018 TN WC 157 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 2, 2018

See Baker v. Electrolux, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Appeals Board Order 5. Scheduling Hearing Order 6. Request for Expedited Hearing 7. Employer's Prehearing Brief 8.

Bunch v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 23, 2007

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Lee v. Roses , 16 2 N.C. App. 129 , 132 , 590 S.E.2d 404 , 407 (2004) [quoting Wilder v. Wilder , 14 6 N.C. App. 574 , 578 , 553 S.E.2d 425 , 428 (2001)].

Polk, Ricky v. Delta Faucet

2018 TN WC App. 43 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 29, 2018

As the Appeals Board has previously stated, it is not our role to address an issue in the first instance. See Buckner v. Eaton Corp., No. 2016-01-0303, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 84, at *12 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. … Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co., 833 S.W.2d 896, 901 n.3 (Tenn. 1992).

Williams, Cornelius v. People Ready, Inc.

2022 TN WC 27 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 18, 2022

In Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co. Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Of Wausau v. Carter, 522 S.W.2d 174, 176 (Tenn. 1975).

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 2002

The Act defines "State Governmental Entity" as "the State of Oklahoma or any agency, board, commission, authority, department, public trust of which the state is the beneficiary or other instrumentality of state government … of County Commissioners v.

DANIELS, DONNIE v. WEST KNOXVILLE PAINTERS, LLC, d/b/a FRESH COAT KNOXVILLE

2026 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 16, 2026

Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. W2016- 02594-SC-R3-WC, 2018 Tenn. LEXIS 8, at *8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Jan. 18, 2018). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Bunch v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 23, 2007

. § 143-291 (a) confers upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Lee v. Roses , 16 2 N.C. App. 129 , 132 , 590 S.E.2d 404 , 407 (2004) [quoting Wilder v. Wilder , 14 6 N.C. App. 574 , 578 , 553 S.E.2d 425 , 428 (2001)].

Martino v. New York State Thruway Authority

154 Misc. 2d 905 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 26, 1992

Defendant relies on Public Authorities Law § 352, which provides that the Thruway Authority is a "board”, and CPLR 312, which articulates the manner of personal service upon a board. … The only support for this contention is in the characterization of the Thruway Authority as a "board” (Public Authorities Law § 352) and the statutory instruction as to how to effect "personal service” upon a board (CPLR

In re the Construction of the Will of Greenberg

198 Misc. 1079 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 22, 1951

He asserts that the mere division of the residue without a specific provision for the distribution thereof is insuEcient to create a bequest and to support his assertion, cites the leading case of Brown v. … guardian’s ward. “ To uphold a legacy by implication, the inference from the will of the intention must be such as to leave no hesitation in the mind of the court and to permit of no other reasonable inference ” (Bradhurst v.

Rex v. Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine

2013 Ohio 3637 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jan 25, 2013

[Cite as Rex v. Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 2013-Ohio-3637.] … Stinson v. England, 69 Ohio St.3d 451, 1994-Ohio-35, paragraph one of the syllabus. {¶ 7} Dr.

In re the Construction of the Will of Dillon

200 Misc. 147 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 21, 1951

Such a gift should not be cut down by subsequent language unless an intent to do so is unmistakably indicated (Tillman v. Ogren, 227 N. Y. 495 ; Banzer v. Banzer, 156 N. … been fixed by the testator for the ascertainment of those constituting it, in the absence of a contrary intent, the beneficiaries are those persons who constitute the class at the date of the testator’s death (Matter of Brown

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1992

WOODY V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 141 OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY, 661 P.2D 892 (OKLA. 1983). WORDS USED IN THE STATUTE, UNLESS OTHERWISE DEFINED, ARE TO BE INTERPRETED IN THEIR ORDINARY SENSE. 25 O.S. 1991 , 1. … BOUTWELL V. STATE, 659 P.2D 322 (OKL. CR. 1983).

Malik v. Hillside Clearview Apartments Realty, LLC

192 Misc. 2d 181 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 18, 2002

Jackman-Brown, J. … (See, Gill v Central Queens Props.

Hardin, Gregory v. W.A. Kendall & Co., Inc.

2019 TN WC 26 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 14, 2019

In Andrews v. Yates Serv., LLC, 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22 (May 8, 20 18), the Appeals Board held that, although the amended definition does not directly apply to injuries prior to its enactment, like Mr. … Criminal Plea, Brandon Moore 10 The Court reserved ruling on the admissibility of this document until it had an opportunity to review the Appeals Board's decision in Kizer v. Express Servs. Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp.

Zhou, Qiao v. Yums Subs

2018 TN WC 200 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 10, 2018

McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Town of New Lebanon v. State

14 Misc. 310 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1920

See Garr v. Bright, 1 Barb. Ch. 157 ; Kiersted v. People, 1 Abb. Pr. 392 ; Coster v. City of Albany, 43 N. Y. 399 ; People v. Dennison, 84 id. 272; Rexford v. State of New York, 105 id. 229; Locke v. … State of New York, *316 140 id. 480; Smith v. State of New York, 227 id. 405; Cunningham v. Macon & Brunswick R. R. Co., 109 U. S. 446 ; Board of Liquidation v. McComb, 92 id. 351; Briscoe v.