Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.51s

  • Bauknecht, Bauknecht, v Five Star Quality Care, Inc., d/b/a Morningside Assisted Living

    2019 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 7, 2019

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Five Star argued that the proposed surgery is not reasonably necessary. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barker, John v. LOUDON COUNTY RENTALS & MINI STORAGE, INC.

    2024 TN WC 85 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 6, 2024

    Frye v. Vincent Printing Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34, at *16 (Aug. 2, 2016). … Braden v. Mohawk Ind., Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. App. Bd. LEXIS 11, at *21-22 (Mar. 1, 2022) (internal citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plouff v. Winston-Salem State University

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 8, 2011

    . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). 9.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Lancaster v. Department of Environmental Resources

    6 Pa. D. & C.3d 159 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Apr 10, 1978

    Supreme Court in Water and Power Resources Board v. … Construction Co. v. DER, 6 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 75-182 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1975

    Considering the last sentence of Paragraph B of 70 O.S. 6 -105 [ 70-6-105 ] may a School District, through board policy or other method, deduct more than the actual amount necessary to pay the substitute teacher provided … As stated in McVicker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1987

    SAN FRANCISCO MINING EXCHANGE V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 378 F.2d 162 (9TH CIR. 1967). … TERMINAL FREIGHT HANDLING V. SOLIEN, 444 F.2d 699 (8TH CIR. 1971). (SUSAN BRIMER LOVING)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montgomery, Anthony v. Mitchell Industrial Tire Co., Inc.

    2019 TN WC App. 31 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 17, 2019

    Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tynan v. State

    157 Misc. 184 · New York Court of Claims · Oct 31, 1935

    Brown, claim No. 22045. … The facts herein are also distinguishable from those in Kirchner v. State ( 223 App. Div. 543 ) and Sporborg v. State (226 id. 113).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Halsted

    172 Misc. 632 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 1, 1939

    (Albany Hospital v. Albany Guardian Society, 214 N. Y. 435 ; Brown v. Feek, 204 id. 238.) The widow of deceased cannot again litigate her status as a person interested in the estate of deceased.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Waterview Village-Community Realty Management v. Ventnor City

    4 N.J. Tax 262 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 24, 1982

    In 9W Contractors, Inc. v. Englewood Cliffs, 1 N.J. … South Plainfield v. Kentile Floors, Inc., 186 N.J.Super. 399 , 453 A.2d 182 (App.Div.1982), cert. granted 91 N.J. 182 , 450 A.2d 521 (1982).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • U.S. Life Realty Corp. v. Jackson Township

    9 N.J. Tax 66 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 1, 1987

    [Tax Court] there is a presumption in favor of the correctness of the county board judgment, Riverview Gardens v. North Arlington, 9 N.J. 167 [ 87 A.2d 425 ] (1952).” Spiotta Brothers v. … See also Almax Builders, Inc. v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-306 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 15, 1974

    Tulsa Boiler and Manufacturing Company v. Shaffer, 72 Okl. 235 , 180 P. 379 ; American Gas Company v. Town of Shattuck, Okl., D.C., 228 F. Supp. 834 . … The opinion further held that the contract submitted by the State Board of Affairs to the Attorney General for approval could not be approved until an appropriate bond had been executed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Henderson v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 13, 2011

    Under the Tort Claims Act, the General Assembly has conferred upon the Industrial Commission jurisdiction over tort claims filed "against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments … The Act is in partial derogation of sovereign immunity, see Stone v. N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-202 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1972

    The intent of the Legislature in passing the act was expressed by the court in Reddell v. State, 170 P. 273 , 14 Okl. Cr. 199 : ". . . … by which the bus driver is employed could not legally be re-employed for the school year of 1952-53, if, at the time of his re-employment, his wife's uncle was still a member of said board of education, but said bus driver

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Township of Landis v. Borough of Vineland

    25 N.J. Misc. 73 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 26, 1946

    A. 54:4-1] $ $ * » The petitioner relies on the case of The Essex County Park Commission v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court), 129 N. J. L. 336; 29 Atl. … See, also, Jersey Central Power and Light Co. v. City of Asbury Park (State Board of Tax Appeals), 21 N. J. Mis. R. 372: 32 Atl.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1989

    SEE, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY V. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION I, CASE NO. 68,405. SEE ALSO, E.G. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 OF TULSA COUNTY V. … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF COUNTY OF TULSA, 674 P.2D 547 (OKLA. 1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-155 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1972

    The State Board of Education and not the Oklahoma Education Association, is the certifying authority as to all Oklahoma public school teachers. Further, the State Board certifies only "teachers" and not "tutors." … In Shepherd v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 2000

    V , § 26 . … City of Ardmore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Brooks' Will

    120 N.Y.S. 596 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 31, 1909

    In Tyler v. Gardiner, 35 N. … Forman v. Smith, 7 Lans. 443, 449 . In Swenarton v. Hancock, 9 Abb. N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson, Landon v Loomis Armored

    2018 TN WC 205 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 17, 2018

    It cited Beecher v. McKesson Corp., 2017 Tenn. Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 41 (July 21, 2017), and Payne v. D and D Elec., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.