Case law

In re the Estate of Blumenkrantz

14 Misc. 3d 462 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 22, 2006

It is within the jurisdiction of this court to determine whether the New York statute is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (see, Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., … Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. Y. 513, 518 ; see, e.g., Bonham v. Coe, 276 N. Y. 540 ; Matter of Straut, 126 N. Y. 201, 212 , *467 Brooklyn Free Kindergarten Soc. v. Elbran Realty Corp., 255 App. Div. 852 ; Robinson v.

Wheat v. Ward County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2

279 S.W. 1116 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 10, 1926

This land was not rendered for taxes for the year 1920, but was appraised and assessed by the board of equalization of the district. … In assessing the real property in. the district, the board gave no consideration to the value of improvements and location of the land. The 'question here presented is the same as that in the ease of J. W. Ogburn v.

Revnew, Deborah v. Amazon.com, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 51 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 3, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Deborah Revnew ) Docket No. 2016-06-0320 ) v. … Norton v. McCaskill, 12 S.W.3d 789, 795 (Tenn. 2000) (Issues raised for the first time on appeal will usually be deemed waived.); Lawrence v.

Opinion No. 71-183 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 21, 1971

In Atlas Life Insurance Co. v. … Bd of Educ., 83 Okl. 12 , 200 P. 171 (1921), the legal question involved was whether or not a certain lease for 99 years, executed by the Board of Education of the City of Tulsa to a private party, was valid and proper.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Ryan Walters, State Superintendent of Public Instruction

2024 OK AG 11 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 2024

Board of Commissioners of Okla. County v. Ryan , 1924 OK 1075, 232 P. 834; In re Thomas' Estate , 1943 OK 115, 136 P.2d 929; Herndon v. Anderson , 1933 OK 490, 25 P.2d 326. … OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION Discussed 1924 OK 652, 228 P. 472, 102 Okla. 158, EDWARDS v. CHILDERS Discussed 1924 OK 1075, 232 P. 834, 107 Okla. 278, BOARD OF COM'RS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY v.

Callahan, Michael v. Amazon.com, Inc.

2015 TN WC 91 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 31, 2015

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board considered a similar issue in McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, supra. … In Crew v.

In re the Estate of Villalonga

6 Misc. 2d 587 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 11, 1957

It is well established that where two interpretations of the word “ children ” are possible the courts have been much disposed to adopt that one which will not serve to disinherit the heirs of the testator (Scott v. … Div. 285, 289 ; Matter of Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 ). By paragraph “ Sixth ” of the will testatrix divided the bulk of her jewelry equally between her two granddaughters, naming them.

In re the Estate of Hawley

32 Misc. 2d 624 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 5, 1961

Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494.) … Inst. v. Peep, 34 N. J. 494, supra).

Global Textile All., Inc. v. Tdi Worldwide, LLC

2017 NCBC 106 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 21, 2017

Tack is a member of GTA’s Board of Directors. 2. … Timothy remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about September 22, 2016, and Steven remained on GTA’s Board of Directors until on or about August 11, 2017. 18.

Hayes, Anthony v. Elmington Property Management

2020 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 16, 2020

Runyon v. Runyon, No. W2013-02651-COA-T10B-CV, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 184, at *20 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2014). … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010)).

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 12, 2008

Helm v. Childers , 75 P.2d 398 , 399 (1938). "Such a determination should be reversed only upon a clear showing that it was manifestly arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable." State ex rel. Brown v. … See, e.g. , Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. Childers , 171 P.2d 600 , 603 (Okla. 1946). In Sharp v.

Galveston Electric Co. v. Marangola

283 S.W. 777 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 26, 1926

As was said by the court in the case of Calhoun v. G. C. & S. F. Ry. Co., 84 Tex. 226 , 19 S. … Co. v. Lee, 70 Tex. 501 , 7 S. W. 857 ; T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Murphy, 46 Tex. 356 , 26 Am. Rep. 272 . We recommend that both judgments be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court. OURETON, C.

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 1996

In the case of a city-beneficiary hospital trust, the board of trustees of which is appointed by the city council, is it a violation of conflict of interest laws for the hospital trust to contract with an ambulance service … Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam Authority, 720 P.2d 713 , 717-18 (Okla. 1986). ¶ 12 It is, therefore, the official Opinion of the Attorney General that: 1.

Holloway, Patricia v. Herbalife International, Inc.

2024 TN WC 14 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 1, 2024

However, the Appeals Board held that this employer-directed provider does not replace a panel or relieve that employer of its obligation to provide a panel of physicians. Hawes v. McLane Co., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … (citing Young v. Young. Elec. Co., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *16 (May 25, 2016).

Masterson v. Ginners Mut. Underwriters' Ass'n

235 S.W. 1081 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 4, 1922

Reel v. Wilson, 64 Iowa, 13 ; Leonard v. Bay Co., 28 N. J. Eq. 192; Woods v. Love, 27 Mich. 308 ; Aldrich v. Stephens, 49 Cal. 676 ; Kipp v. Brandt, 49 How. Prac. (N. Y.) 358. in the case of Reel v. … Barnes v. Jamison, 24 Tex. 362 ; Baldwin v. Root, 90 Tex. 552 .”

Timmons v. Scott

900 N.E.2d 88 · Indiana Tax Court · Dec 23, 2008

900 N.E.2d 88 (2008) TIMMONS v. SCOTT. No. 45T10-0706-TA-36. Tax Court of Indiana. December 23, 2008. Disposition of case by unpublished memorandum decision. The final determination of the Indiana Board is Affirmed.

In re the Estate of James

22 Misc. 2d 1062 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 16, 1953

Joseph’s Hosp. v. Bennett, supra; Matter of Durbrow, 245 N. Y. 469, 477 ; Associate Alumni v. General Theol. Seminary, 163 N. Y. 417, 422 ; Matter of Lachat, 184 Misc. 486 ; Balluffi v. … (See Balluffi v. Montross, supra.).

Primm, Chad v. Central Sales & Service, Inc.

2026 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 24, 2026

Further, as Central Sales argued, the Appeals Board reduced an award of costs “incurred in the pursuit of permanent total disability benefits,” which claim was unsuccessful. Oldham v. Freeman Webb Co. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 71-156 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 23, 1971

State aid is permissible pursuant to the State Board of Education's approval as a supplement to any transfer authorized by law pursuant to the applicable provisions of the 1970 School Code where the transferring district … Co. v.

Corrado v. Township of Montclair

18 N.J. Tax 200 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 22, 1999

The 1997 appeals were timely filed at the county board and the Tax Court. … Under Brill v.